Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BaseTools/Source/C/GNUmakefile: Added a condition for handling invalid A... #2

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mjwade
Copy link

@mjwade mjwade commented Mar 1, 2014

BaseTools/Source/C/GNUmakefile: Added a condition for handling invalid ARCH values.

If a user has ARCH already set to x86_64, then the makefile would fail. In the new code, a check is inserted to ensure that ARCH is set to X64 or IA32. If it's not, then notify the user of the problem detected and exit.

Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Mike Wade [email protected]

…d ARCH values.

If a user has ARCH already set to x86_64, then the makefile would fail.  In the new code, a check is inserted to ensure that ARCH is set to X64 or IA32.  If it's not, then notify the user of the problem detected and exit.

Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Mike Wade <[email protected]>
jljusten pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2014
… issues came up related to vs2013 build and caused the build to fail.

Vs2013 issue #1:  warning message about uninitialized variables or pointers like this:
s:\incbld\ia32\intelframeworkmodulepkg\bus\isa\isabusdxe\isabus.c(395) : warning C4701: potentially uninitialized local variable 'DevicePathData' used
s:\incbld\ia32\intelframeworkmodulepkg\bus\isa\isabusdxe\isabus.c(395) : warning C4703: potentially uninitialized local pointer variable 'DevicePathData' used
LINK : fatal error LNK1257: code generation failed
The following online messages shows discussions related to this vs2013 issue and how Microsoft engineer responded.  They suggest a work around by adding the initialization for the variables.
https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/816730/bogus-warning-from-vs-2013

Vs2013 issue #2:
C:\Program Files\Windows Kits\8.1\include\um\winnt.h(5105) : error C2220: warning treated as error - no 'object' file generated
C:\Program Files\Windows Kits\8.1\include\um\winnt.h(5105) : warning C4005: 'InterlockedCompareExchange64' : macro redefinition
This happened for Nt32Pkg.

Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Wang, Yu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gao, Liming <[email protected]>


git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@15722 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
vchong pushed a commit to linaro-swg/edk2 that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2015
jljusten pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2015
PeiCore hang when loads a PEIM whose section alignment requirement is 0x40
but the actual base address is 0x20 aligned.

The issue is caused by the following facts, in order:

1. GCC49 requires the section alignment of .data to be 0x40. So a new link
   script gcc4.9-ld-script was added for GCC49 to specify the 0x40
   alignment.

2. GenFw tool was enhanced to sync ELF's section alignment to PE header.
   Before the enhancement, the section alignment of converted PE image
   always equals to 0x20.

If only with #1 change, GCC49 build image won't hang in PeiCore because
the converted PE image still claims 0x20 section alignment which is
aligned to the align setting set in FDF file. But later with #2 change,
the converted PE image starts to claims 0x40 section alignment, while
build tool still puts the PEIM in 0x20 aligned address, resulting the
PeCoffLoaderLoadImage() reports IMAGE_ERROR_INVALID_SECTION_ALIGNMENT
error.

Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>

git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17902 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
@jljusten
Copy link
Member

I think if ARCH is set to x86_64 or amd64, we can re-export it as X64 for the BaseTools build.

The lines on your commit message are too long:
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/Commit-Message-Format

Can you review BaseTools/Contributions.txt and post your patch to edk2-devel? (We can't use pull requests at this time.)

@jljusten jljusten closed this Jul 26, 2015
lersek added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2016
Before the merger of the authenticated and non-authenticated variable
drivers (commit fa0737a), we had to match the varstore header GUID in
"OvmfPkg/VarStore.fdf.inc" to SECURE_BOOT_ENABLE, because the opposite
GUID would cause either driver to fail an assertion. The header structures
for individual variables residing in the varstore were different
(VARIABLE_HEADER vs. AUTHENTICATED_VARIABLE_HEADER), and each driver could
only handle its own, so this GUID enforcement was necessary.

Since the unification of the variable driver however, it treats (a)
variable store format, and (b) AuthVariableLib instance as independent
characteristics; it can always manipulate variable stores with both header
types. All variations boot now; the difference is whether authenticated
variables, and special variables computed from them (like SecureBoot) are
supported at runtime:

    variable store                                  non-auth   auth and SB
    header GUID            AuthVariableLib          variables  variables
--  ---------------------  -------------------  ->  ---------  -----------
 1  Variable               SecurityPkg/...          supported  unsupported
 2  Variable               AuthVariableLibNull      supported  unsupported
 3  AuthenticatedVariable  SecurityPkg/...          supported  supported
 4  AuthenticatedVariable  AuthVariableLibNull      supported  unsupported

At the moment, SECURE_BOOT_ENABLE selects between cases #2 (FALSE) and #3
(TRUE). That is, it controls both the varstore header GUID in
"OvmfPkg/VarStore.fdf.inc", and the AuthVariableLib resolution in the DSC
files.

Exploiting the unified driver's flexibility, we can simplify
"OvmfPkg/VarStore.fdf.inc" by picking the AuthenticatedVariable GUID as a
constant, and letting SECURE_BOOT_ENABLE control only the AuthVariableLib
resolution. This amounts to SECURE_BOOT_ENABLE choosing between cases #3
(TRUE) and #4 (FALSE), with identical results as before.

Cc: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
Cc: Star Zeng <[email protected]>
Ref: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bios.edk2.devel/7319/focus=7344
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <[email protected]>
mdkinney referenced this pull request in mdkinney/edk2 Mar 8, 2016
Before the merger of the authenticated and non-authenticated variable
drivers (commit fa0737a), we had to match the varstore header GUID in
"OvmfPkg/VarStore.fdf.inc" to SECURE_BOOT_ENABLE, because the opposite
GUID would cause either driver to fail an assertion. The header structures
for individual variables residing in the varstore were different
(VARIABLE_HEADER vs. AUTHENTICATED_VARIABLE_HEADER), and each driver could
only handle its own, so this GUID enforcement was necessary.

Since the unification of the variable driver however, it treats (a)
variable store format, and (b) AuthVariableLib instance as independent
characteristics; it can always manipulate variable stores with both header
types. All variations boot now; the difference is whether authenticated
variables, and special variables computed from them (like SecureBoot) are
supported at runtime:

    variable store                                  non-auth   auth and SB
    header GUID            AuthVariableLib          variables  variables
--  ---------------------  -------------------  ->  ---------  -----------
 1  Variable               SecurityPkg/...          supported  unsupported
 2  Variable               AuthVariableLibNull      supported  unsupported
 3  AuthenticatedVariable  SecurityPkg/...          supported  supported
 4  AuthenticatedVariable  AuthVariableLibNull      supported  unsupported

At the moment, SECURE_BOOT_ENABLE selects between cases #2 (FALSE) and #3
(TRUE). That is, it controls both the varstore header GUID in
"OvmfPkg/VarStore.fdf.inc", and the AuthVariableLib resolution in the DSC
files.

Exploiting the unified driver's flexibility, we can simplify
"OvmfPkg/VarStore.fdf.inc" by picking the AuthenticatedVariable GUID as a
constant, and letting SECURE_BOOT_ENABLE control only the AuthVariableLib
resolution. This amounts to SECURE_BOOT_ENABLE choosing between cases #3
(TRUE) and #4 (FALSE), with identical results as before.

Cc: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
Cc: Star Zeng <[email protected]>
Ref: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bios.edk2.devel/7319/focus=7344
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <[email protected]>
jiaxinwu added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2016
IpSb->Reconfig should not be set to TRUE to focal the reconfiguration
during the policy changes from Static to DHCP. It's redundancy because
the default router table and default addresses have been freed ahead (
Detailed see Ip4Config2OnPolicyChanged() function). Otherwise, the
potential failure will appear if UseDefaultAddress configured. Reproduce
steps see below:

#1. Set policy to DHCP.
#2. If DHCP process is not complete yet, then run one APP to invoke UDP4
Configure with "UseDefaultAddress = TRUE" (loop to call UDP4 Configure
until Ip4Mode.IsConfigured changes to TRUE).
#3. Even DHCP succeed but Ip4Mode.IsConfigured flag never set to TRUE

Concrete analysis is as follows:
In #1, the policy will be set to DHCP, and then Ip4Config2OnPolicyChanged()
will be called. In this function, if "IpSb->Reconfig" flag is set to TRUE,
the original "IpSb->DefaultInterface" will be abandoned/freed once the
DHCP process finished.

In #2, UDP4 Configure with "UseDefaultAddress = TRUE" is called, that means
the default interface (IpSb->DefaultInterface) will be selected as current
instance's interface.

In #3, when DHCP process finished, the original DefaultInterface will be
abandoned/freed because "IpSb->Reconfig" flag is true. Meanwhile, one new
interface is assigned to "IpSb->DefaultInterface". This new interface is
different to the original one assigned to the UDP4 Configured instance. So,
even DHCP process succeed, the up caller will never have the chance to get
it's truly status.

Cc: Cohen Eugene <[email protected]>
Cc: Ye Ting <[email protected]>
Cc: Fu Siyuan <[email protected]>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Eugene Cohen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ye Ting <[email protected]>
jiaxinwu added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2016
*v2: update the commit log and refine the code comments.

There are three kinds of IKE Exchange process:
#1. Initial Exchange
#2. CREATE_CHILD_SA_Exchange
#3. Information Exchange

The IKE header "FLAG" update is incorrect in #2 and #3 exchange,
which may cause the continue session failure. This patch is used
to correct the updates of IKE header "FLAG" according the RFC4306
section 3.1.

Cc: Ye Ting <[email protected]>
Cc: Fu Siyuan <[email protected]>
Cc: Zhang Lubo <[email protected]>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ye Ting <[email protected]>
ardbiesheuvel pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2016
Fix two bugs:
- Erroneous shift of 2 in a bytes to bits conversion.
- Use reverse subtract rather than negate for value that is subsequently
  used as operand #2 in a shift operation.

Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <[email protected]>
lersek referenced this pull request in lersek/edk2 Apr 25, 2017
Commit bd3fc81 ("ShellPkg/App: Fix memory leak and save resources.",
2016-05-20) added a FreePool() call for Split->SplitStdIn, near end of the
RunSplitCommand(), right after the same shell file was closed with
CloseFile(). The argument was:

> 1) RunSplitCommand() allocates the initial SplitStdOut via
>    CreateFileInterfaceMem(). Free SplitStdIn after the swap to fix
>    the memory leak.

There is no memory leak actually, and the FreePool() call in question
constitutes a double-free:

(a) This is how the handle is established:

    ConvertEfiFileProtocolToShellHandle (
      CreateFileInterfaceMem (Unicode),
      NULL
      );

    CreateFileInterfaceMem() allocates an EFI_FILE_PROTOCOL_MEM object and
    populates it fully. ConvertEfiFileProtocolToShellHandle() allocates
    some administrative structures and links the EFI_FILE_PROTOCOL_MEM
    object into "mFileHandleList".

(b) EFI_SHELL_PROTOCOL.CloseFile() is required to close the
    SHELL_FILE_HANDLE and to release all associated data. Accordingly,
    near the end of RunSplitCommand(), we have:

    EfiShellClose()
      ShellFileHandleRemove()
        //
        // undoes the effects of ConvertEfiFileProtocolToShellHandle()
        //
      ConvertShellHandleToEfiFileProtocol()
        //
        // note that this does not adjust the pointer value; it's a pure
        // type cast
        //
      FileHandleClose()
        FileInterfaceMemClose()
          //
          // tears down EFI_FILE_PROTOCOL_MEM completely, undoing the
          // effects of CreateFileInterfaceMem ()
          //

The FreePool() call added by bd3fc81 conflicts with

  SHELL_FREE_NON_NULL(This);

in FileInterfaceMemClose(), so remove it.

This error can be reproduced for example with:

> Shell> map | more
> 'more' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable
> program, or script file.

which triggers:

> ASSERT MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c(624): CR has Bad Signature

with the following stack dump:

> #0  0x000000007f6dc094 in CpuDeadLoop () at
>     MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/CpuDeadLoop.c:37
> #1  0x000000007f6dd1b4 in DebugAssert (FileName=0x7f6ed9f0
>     "MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c", LineNumber=624,
>     Description=0x7f6ed9d8 "CR has Bad Signature") at
>     OvmfPkg/Library/PlatformDebugLibIoPort/DebugLib.c:153
> #2  0x000000007f6d075d in CoreFreePoolI (Buffer=0x7e232c98,
>     PoolType=0x7f6bc1c4) at MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c:624
> tianocore#3  0x000000007f6d060e in CoreInternalFreePool (Buffer=0x7e232c98,
>     PoolType=0x7f6bc1c4) at MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c:529
> tianocore#4  0x000000007f6d0648 in CoreFreePool (Buffer=0x7e232c98) at
>     MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c:552
> tianocore#5  0x000000007d49fbf8 in FreePool (Buffer=0x7e232c98) at
>     MdePkg/Library/UefiMemoryAllocationLib/MemoryAllocationLib.c:818
> tianocore#6  0x000000007d4875c3 in RunSplitCommand (CmdLine=0x7d898398,
>     StdIn=0x0, StdOut=0x0) at ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c:1813
> tianocore#7  0x000000007d487d59 in ProcessNewSplitCommandLine
>     (CmdLine=0x7d898398) at ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c:2121
> tianocore#8  0x000000007d488937 in RunShellCommand (CmdLine=0x7e233018,
>     CommandStatus=0x0) at ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c:2670
> tianocore#9  0x000000007d488b0b in RunCommand (CmdLine=0x7e233018) at
>     ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c:2732
> tianocore#10 0x000000007d4867c8 in DoShellPrompt () at
>     ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c:1349
> tianocore#11 0x000000007d48524d in UefiMain (ImageHandle=0x7e24c898,
>     SystemTable=0x7f5b6018) at ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c:631

Cc: Jaben Carsey <[email protected]>
Cc: Marvin Häuser <[email protected]>
Cc: Qiu Shumin <[email protected]>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <[email protected]>
Fixes: bd3fc81
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
lersek added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2017
Commit bd3fc81 ("ShellPkg/App: Fix memory leak and save resources.",
2016-05-20) added a FreePool() call for Split->SplitStdIn, near end of the
RunSplitCommand(), right after the same shell file was closed with
CloseFile(). The argument was:

> 1) RunSplitCommand() allocates the initial SplitStdOut via
>    CreateFileInterfaceMem(). Free SplitStdIn after the swap to fix
>    the memory leak.

There is no memory leak actually, and the FreePool() call in question
constitutes a double-free:

(a) This is how the handle is established:

    ConvertEfiFileProtocolToShellHandle (
      CreateFileInterfaceMem (Unicode),
      NULL
      );

    CreateFileInterfaceMem() allocates an EFI_FILE_PROTOCOL_MEM object and
    populates it fully. ConvertEfiFileProtocolToShellHandle() allocates
    some administrative structures and links the EFI_FILE_PROTOCOL_MEM
    object into "mFileHandleList".

(b) EFI_SHELL_PROTOCOL.CloseFile() is required to close the
    SHELL_FILE_HANDLE and to release all associated data. Accordingly,
    near the end of RunSplitCommand(), we have:

    EfiShellClose()
      ShellFileHandleRemove()
        //
        // undoes the effects of ConvertEfiFileProtocolToShellHandle()
        //
      ConvertShellHandleToEfiFileProtocol()
        //
        // note that this does not adjust the pointer value; it's a pure
        // type cast
        //
      FileHandleClose()
        FileInterfaceMemClose()
          //
          // tears down EFI_FILE_PROTOCOL_MEM completely, undoing the
          // effects of CreateFileInterfaceMem ()
          //

The FreePool() call added by bd3fc81 conflicts with

  SHELL_FREE_NON_NULL(This);

in FileInterfaceMemClose(), so remove it.

This error can be reproduced for example with:

> Shell> map | more
> 'more' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable
> program, or script file.

which triggers:

> ASSERT MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c(624): CR has Bad Signature

with the following stack dump:

> #0  0x000000007f6dc094 in CpuDeadLoop () at
>     MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/CpuDeadLoop.c:37
> #1  0x000000007f6dd1b4 in DebugAssert (FileName=0x7f6ed9f0
>     "MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c", LineNumber=624,
>     Description=0x7f6ed9d8 "CR has Bad Signature") at
>     OvmfPkg/Library/PlatformDebugLibIoPort/DebugLib.c:153
> #2  0x000000007f6d075d in CoreFreePoolI (Buffer=0x7e232c98,
>     PoolType=0x7f6bc1c4) at MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c:624
> #3  0x000000007f6d060e in CoreInternalFreePool (Buffer=0x7e232c98,
>     PoolType=0x7f6bc1c4) at MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c:529
> #4  0x000000007f6d0648 in CoreFreePool (Buffer=0x7e232c98) at
>     MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c:552
> #5  0x000000007d49fbf8 in FreePool (Buffer=0x7e232c98) at
>     MdePkg/Library/UefiMemoryAllocationLib/MemoryAllocationLib.c:818
> #6  0x000000007d4875c3 in RunSplitCommand (CmdLine=0x7d898398,
>     StdIn=0x0, StdOut=0x0) at ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c:1813
> #7  0x000000007d487d59 in ProcessNewSplitCommandLine
>     (CmdLine=0x7d898398) at ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c:2121
> #8  0x000000007d488937 in RunShellCommand (CmdLine=0x7e233018,
>     CommandStatus=0x0) at ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c:2670
> #9  0x000000007d488b0b in RunCommand (CmdLine=0x7e233018) at
>     ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c:2732
> #10 0x000000007d4867c8 in DoShellPrompt () at
>     ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c:1349
> #11 0x000000007d48524d in UefiMain (ImageHandle=0x7e24c898,
>     SystemTable=0x7f5b6018) at ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c:631

Cc: Jaben Carsey <[email protected]>
Cc: Marvin Häuser <[email protected]>
Cc: Qiu Shumin <[email protected]>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <[email protected]>
Fixes: bd3fc81
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Marvin Häuser <[email protected]>
niruiyu pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2017
Commit bd3fc81 ("ShellPkg/App: Fix memory leak and save resources.",
2016-05-20) added a FreePool() call for Split->SplitStdIn, near end of the
RunSplitCommand(), right after the same shell file was closed with
CloseFile(). The argument was:

> 1) RunSplitCommand() allocates the initial SplitStdOut via
>    CreateFileInterfaceMem(). Free SplitStdIn after the swap to fix
>    the memory leak.

There is no memory leak actually, and the FreePool() call in question
constitutes a double-free:

(a) This is how the handle is established:

    ConvertEfiFileProtocolToShellHandle (
      CreateFileInterfaceMem (Unicode),
      NULL
      );

    CreateFileInterfaceMem() allocates an EFI_FILE_PROTOCOL_MEM object and
    populates it fully. ConvertEfiFileProtocolToShellHandle() allocates
    some administrative structures and links the EFI_FILE_PROTOCOL_MEM
    object into "mFileHandleList".

(b) EFI_SHELL_PROTOCOL.CloseFile() is required to close the
    SHELL_FILE_HANDLE and to release all associated data. Accordingly,
    near the end of RunSplitCommand(), we have:

    EfiShellClose()
      ShellFileHandleRemove()
        //
        // undoes the effects of ConvertEfiFileProtocolToShellHandle()
        //
      ConvertShellHandleToEfiFileProtocol()
        //
        // note that this does not adjust the pointer value; it's a pure
        // type cast
        //
      FileHandleClose()
        FileInterfaceMemClose()
          //
          // tears down EFI_FILE_PROTOCOL_MEM completely, undoing the
          // effects of CreateFileInterfaceMem ()
          //

The FreePool() call added by bd3fc81 conflicts with

  SHELL_FREE_NON_NULL(This);

in FileInterfaceMemClose(), so remove it.

This error can be reproduced for example with:

> Shell> map | more
> 'more' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable
> program, or script file.

which triggers:

> ASSERT MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c(624): CR has Bad Signature

with the following stack dump:

> #0  0x000000007f6dc094 in CpuDeadLoop () at
>     MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/CpuDeadLoop.c:37
> #1  0x000000007f6dd1b4 in DebugAssert (FileName=0x7f6ed9f0
>     "MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c", LineNumber=624,
>     Description=0x7f6ed9d8 "CR has Bad Signature") at
>     OvmfPkg/Library/PlatformDebugLibIoPort/DebugLib.c:153
> #2  0x000000007f6d075d in CoreFreePoolI (Buffer=0x7e232c98,
>     PoolType=0x7f6bc1c4) at MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c:624
> #3  0x000000007f6d060e in CoreInternalFreePool (Buffer=0x7e232c98,
>     PoolType=0x7f6bc1c4) at MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c:529
> #4  0x000000007f6d0648 in CoreFreePool (Buffer=0x7e232c98) at
>     MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c:552
> #5  0x000000007d49fbf8 in FreePool (Buffer=0x7e232c98) at
>     MdePkg/Library/UefiMemoryAllocationLib/MemoryAllocationLib.c:818
> #6  0x000000007d4875c3 in RunSplitCommand (CmdLine=0x7d898398,
>     StdIn=0x0, StdOut=0x0) at ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c:1813
> #7  0x000000007d487d59 in ProcessNewSplitCommandLine
>     (CmdLine=0x7d898398) at ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c:2121
> #8  0x000000007d488937 in RunShellCommand (CmdLine=0x7e233018,
>     CommandStatus=0x0) at ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c:2670
> #9  0x000000007d488b0b in RunCommand (CmdLine=0x7e233018) at
>     ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c:2732
> #10 0x000000007d4867c8 in DoShellPrompt () at
>     ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c:1349
> #11 0x000000007d48524d in UefiMain (ImageHandle=0x7e24c898,
>     SystemTable=0x7f5b6018) at ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c:631

Cc: Jaben Carsey <[email protected]>
Cc: Marvin Häuser <[email protected]>
Cc: Qiu Shumin <[email protected]>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <[email protected]>
Fixes: bd3fc81
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Marvin Häuser <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 227fe49)
codomania added a commit to codomania/edk2 that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2017
…operation

The current implementation was making assumption that AllocateBuffer()
returns a buffer with C-bit cleared. Hence when we were asked to
Map() with BusMasterCommonBuffer, we do not change the C-bit on
host buffer.

In previous patch, we changed the AllocateBuffer() to not clear
C-bit during allocation. The patch adds support for handling the
BusMasterCommonBuffer operations when SEV is active.

A typical DMA Bus master Common Operation follows the below step:

1. Client calls AllocateBuffer() to allocate a common buffer
2. Client fill some data in common buffer (optional)
3. Client calls Map() with BusMasterCommonBuffer
4. Programs the DMA bus master with the device address returned by Map()
5. The common buffer can now be accessed equally by the processor and
   the DMA bus master.
6. Client calls Unmap()
7. Client calls FreeBuffer()

In order to handle steps tianocore#2 (in which common buffer may contain
data), we perform in-place encryption to ensure that device
address returned by the Map() contains the correct data after
we clear the C-bit during Map().

In my measurement I do not see any noticable perform degradation when
performing in-place encryption/decryption on common buffer.

Suggested-by: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
Cc: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <[email protected]>
mdkinney pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2017
As part of commit 5f82e02, ActiveRecordInDb was introduced as a copy
of RecordInDb as latter may be freed by the callback function. This
commit replaces an access of RecordInDb after the callback function
has been executed with an access to ActiveRecordInDb.

Cc: Michael D Kinney <[email protected]>
Cc: Kelly Steele <[email protected]>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Marvin Haeuser <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <[email protected]>
niruiyu added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2017
The new algorithm converts the problem calculating optimal
MTRR settings (using least MTRR registers) to the problem finding
the shortest path in a graph.
The memory required in extreme but rare case can be up to 256KB,
so using local stack buffer is impossible considering current
DxeIpl only allocates 128KB stack.

The patch changes existing MtrrSetMemoryAttributeInMtrrSettings() and
MtrrSetMemoryAttribute() to use the 4-page stack buffer for
calculation. The two APIs return BUFFER_TOO_SMALL when the buffer
is too small for calculation.

The patch adds a new API MtrrSetMemoryAttribute*s*InMtrrSettings() to
set multiple-range attributes in one function call.
Since every call to MtrrSetMemoryAttributeInMtrrSettings (without-s)
or MtrrSetMemoryAttribute() requires to calculate the MTRRs for the
whole physical memory, combining multiple calls in one API can
significantly reduce the calculation time.
In theory, if N times of call to without-s API costs N seconds,
the new API only costs 1 second.
The new API uses the buffer supplied from caller to calculate
MTRRs and returns BUFFER_TOO_SMALL when the buffer is too small for
calculation.

Test performed:
1. Random test
 a. Generate random memory settings, use the new algorithm to
    calculate the MTRRs.
 b. Read back the MTRRs and check the memory settings match
    the desired memory settings.
 c. Repeat the above #1 and #2 100000 times.
2. OVMF 32PEI + 64DXE boot to shell.

Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <[email protected]>
Cc: Eric Dong <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <[email protected]>
lgao4 added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2017
PerformancePkg contains following components:
1. TscTimerLib
2. Dp_App
3. Header files.

#1 has already been deprecated.
#2 can be removed because DpApp was added to ShellPkg.
#3 Header files are not used by DpApp and
   MdeModulePkg/PerformanceLib instances.

In summary, this package is no longer useful.

All related platforms have been updated to remove the references.

Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <[email protected]>
Cc: Jaben Carsey <[email protected]>
Cc: Daryl McDaniel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <[email protected]>
jiaxinwu added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2018
v2:
* Refine the commit log.

There are two place to close the ISCSI ExitBootServiceEvent:
#1.IScsiOnExitBootService(), which is the callback function of
   ExitBootServiceEvent.
#2.IScsiCleanDriverData(), which will be invoked by ISCSI driver
   binding stop().

So, the ExitBootServiceEvent will be closed and freed when exit boot
server is triggered. But it may be closed and freed again in ISCSI driver
binding stop(), which will result in the issue recorded at
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=742.

This patch is to resolve the issue.

Cc: Ye Ting <[email protected]>
Cc: Fu Siyuan <[email protected]>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Wu Jiaxin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Fu Siyuan <[email protected]>
jiaxinwu added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2018
v2:
* Refine the commit log.

There are two place to close the ISCSI ExitBootServiceEvent:
#1.IScsiOnExitBootService(), which is the callback function of
   ExitBootServiceEvent.
#2.IScsiCleanDriverData(), which will be invoked by ISCSI driver
   binding stop().

So, the ExitBootServiceEvent will be closed and freed when exit boot
server is triggered. But it may be closed and freed again in ISCSI driver
binding stop(), which will result in the issue recorded at
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=742.

This patch is to resolve the issue.

Cc: Ye Ting <[email protected]>
Cc: Fu Siyuan <[email protected]>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Wu Jiaxin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Fu Siyuan <[email protected]>
jiaxinwu added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2018
v2:
* Refine the commit log.

There are two place to close the ISCSI ExitBootServiceEvent:
#1.IScsiOnExitBootService(), which is the callback function of
   ExitBootServiceEvent.
#2.IScsiCleanDriverData(), which will be invoked by ISCSI driver
   binding stop().

So, the ExitBootServiceEvent will be closed and freed when exit boot
server is triggered. But it may be closed and freed again in ISCSI driver
binding stop(), which will result in the issue recorded at
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=742.

This patch is to resolve the issue.

Cc: Ye Ting <[email protected]>
Cc: Fu Siyuan <[email protected]>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Wu Jiaxin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Fu Siyuan <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit d321598)
jiaxinwu added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2018
v2:
* Refine the commit log.

There are two place to close the ISCSI ExitBootServiceEvent:
#1.IScsiOnExitBootService(), which is the callback function of
   ExitBootServiceEvent.
#2.IScsiCleanDriverData(), which will be invoked by ISCSI driver
   binding stop().

So, the ExitBootServiceEvent will be closed and freed when exit boot
server is triggered. But it may be closed and freed again in ISCSI driver
binding stop(), which will result in the issue recorded at
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=742.

This patch is to resolve the issue.

Cc: Ye Ting <[email protected]>
Cc: Fu Siyuan <[email protected]>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Wu Jiaxin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Fu Siyuan <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit a37c60b)
yzhu52 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2018
1) Add a new file Common/caching.py
    a.	Allows for automated caching of repeated class functions, class
        properties, and non-class functions
    b.	When called the first time the value is cached and if called a
        second time, the cached result is called, not the function.
    c.	When used, this saves lots of memory since the actual function
        pointers are replaced with smaller data elements.
    d.  note that not all features are used yet.
2) Fix AutoGen/GenMake and AutoGen/GetC to not call into private member
    variables of ModuleAutoGen class
    a. use the existing accessor properties for the data
3) Change AutoGen classes to remove a exception for duplicate members in
    __new__ and use ?in? testing to speed up
4)	Work on ModuleAutoGen class
    a.	Change all properties that use caching to use @caching_property
        (see #1 above)
    b.	Change all properties that do not use caching to use standard python
        decorator "@Property"
    c.	Change all cases where a dictionary/set/list/object was created
        and then immediately updated to use constructor parameters
    d.	Refactor each property function to remove the internal variable
        that is no longer needed (this helps find items like #2 above)
    e.  Refactor _ApplyBuildRule with optional parameter to work around
        circular dependency with BinaryFileList.

Note that 4e was almost certainly unintended as the functions were acting on
incomplete information since they were directly accessing private instance
variables at the same time another function on the stack was creating the same
private isntance data.

This overall changes behavior slightly, but makes the codebase smaller and
easier to read.

Cc: Liming Gao <[email protected]>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <[email protected]>
Cc: Bob Feng <[email protected]>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jaben Carsey <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <[email protected]>
jwang36 added a commit to jwang36/edk2 that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2018
> v3 changes:
> a. split from tianocore#2 patch of v2
> b. refine the commit message
> c. refine the title

Non-stop mode was introduced / explained in commit 8f26136
("MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec: add new settings for PCDs",
2018-08-30).

The macro HEAP_GUARD_NONSTOP_MODE was added to CpuDxe in commit
dcc0262 ("UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe: implement non-stop mode for uefi",
2018-08-30).

Another instance of the macro HEAP_GUARD_NONSTOP_MODE was added to
PiSmmCpuDxeSmm -- with BIT1|BIT0 replaced with BIT3|BIT2 -- in commit
09afd9a ("UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: implement non-stop mode for
SMM", 2018-08-30)

Since the freed-memory guard is for UEFI-only. This patch only updates
HEAP_GUARD_NONSTOP_MODE in "UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/CpuDxe.h" (add BIT4).

Cc: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
Cc: Star Zeng <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <[email protected]>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <[email protected]>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <[email protected]>
jwang36 added a commit to jwang36/edk2 that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2018
> v3 changes:
> a. split from tianocore#2 patch
> b. refine the commit message and title
> c. remove "else" branch

The freed-memory guard feature will cause an recursive calling
of InitializePageTablePool(). This is due to a fact that
AllocateAlignedPages() is used to allocate page table pool memory.
This function will most likely call gBS->FreePages to free unaligned
pages and then cause another round of page attributes change, like
below (freed pages will be always marked not-present if freed-memory
guard is enabled)

   FreePages() <===============|
=> CpuSetMemoryAttributes()    |
=> <if out of page table>      |
=> InitializePageTablePool()   |
=> AllocateAlignedPages()      |
=> FreePages() ================|

The solution is add a global variable as a lock in page table pool
allocation function and fail any other requests if it has not been
done.

Since this issue will only happen if free-memory guard is enabled,
it won't affect CpuSetMemoryAttributes() in default build of a BIOS.

If free-memory guard is enabled, it only affect the pages
(failed to mark them as not-present) freed in AllocateAlignedPages().

Since those freed pages haven't been used yet (their addresses not
yet exposed to code outside AllocateAlignedPages), it won't compromise
the freed-memory guard feature.

This change will just fail the CpuSetMemoryAttributes() called from
FreePages() but it won't fail the FreePages(). So the error status
won't be propagated upper layer of code.

Cc: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
Cc: Star Zeng <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <[email protected]>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <[email protected]>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <[email protected]>
niruiyu added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2019
MpInitLib sets X2ApicEnable in two places.
1. CollectProcessorCount()
   This function is called when MpInitLibInitialize() hasn't been
   called before.
   It sets X2ApicEnable and later in the same function it configures
   all CPUs to operate in X2 APIC mode.
2. MpInitLibInitialize()
   The X2ApicEnable setting happens when this function is called in
   second time. But after that setting, no code consumes that flag.

With the above analysis and with the purpose of simplifying the code,
the X2ApicEnable in #1 is changed to local variable and the #2 can be
changed to remove the setting of X2ApicEnable.

Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
pfmooney pushed a commit to pfmooney/uefi-edk2 that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2020
* Rip out hack-around for old broken behavior

This hack effectively limits the guest to one device path lookup at a time,
always returning the same address- presumably for the mentioned damage
control on older FreeBSD fixed in r285246.

Rip out now- it's quite limiting and not great behavior.

* Also remove DEBUG() mentioning that we're overriding HandleProtocol
niruiyu referenced this pull request in niruiyu/edk2 Mar 17, 2021
MpInitLib contains a function MicrocodeDetect() which is called by
all threads as an AP procedure.
Today this function contains below code:

    if (CurrentRevision != LatestRevision) {
      AcquireSpinLock(&CpuMpData->MpLock);
      DEBUG ((
        EFI_D_ERROR,
        "Updated microcode signature [0x%08x] does not match \
        loaded microcode signature [0x%08x]\n",
        CurrentRevision, LatestRevision
        ));
      ReleaseSpinLock(&CpuMpData->MpLock);
    }

When the if-check is passed, the code may call into PEI services:
1. AcquireSpinLock
   When the PcdSpinTimeout is not 0, TimerLib
   GetPerformanceCounterProperties() is called. And some of the
   TimerLib implementations would get the information cached in
   HOB. But AP procedure cannot call PEI services to retrieve the
   HOB list.

2. DEBUG
   Certain DebugLib relies on ReportStatusCode services and the
   ReportStatusCode PPI is retrieved through the PEI services.
   DebugLibSerialPort should be used.
   But when SerialPortLib is implemented to depend on PEI services,
   even using DebugLibSerialPort can still cause AP calls PEI
   services resulting hang.

It causes a lot of debugging effort on the platform side.

There are 2 options to fix the problem:
1. make sure platform DSC chooses the proper DebugLib and set the
   PcdSpinTimeout to 0. So that AcquireSpinLock and DEBUG don't call
   PEI services.
2. remove the AcquireSpinLock and DEBUG call from the procedure.

Option #2 is preferred because it's not practical to ask every
platform DSC to be written properly.

Following option #2, there are two sub-options:
2.A. Just remove the if-check.
2.B. Capture the CurrentRevision and ExpectedRevision in the memory
     for each AP and print them together from BSP.

The patch follows option 2.B.

Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <[email protected]>
kraxel added a commit to kraxel/edk2 that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2023
kuqin12 pushed a commit to kuqin12/edk2 that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2023
## Description

Ensures LIBRARY_CLASS as specified in the library override INF defines
section is the same value as the library class specified in the override
line.

## Example of mismatch
``` cmd
ERROR - EDK2 tianocore#2 from c:\src\mu_tiano_platforms\Platforms\QemuQ35Pkg\QemuQ35Pkg.dsc(...): LIBRARY_CLASS for override: [c:\src\mu_tiano_platforms\MU_BASECORE\MdePkg\Library\BasePcdLibNull\BasePcdLibNull.inf] does not match the library class being overridden: [DevicePathLib]
```

closes tianocore#314

For each item, place an "x" in between `[` and `]` if true. Example:
`[x]`.
_(you can also check items in the GitHub UI)_

- [ ] Impacts functionality?
- **Functionality** - Does the change ultimately impact how firmware
functions?
- Examples: Add a new library, publish a new PPI, update an algorithm,
...
- [ ] Impacts security?
- **Security** - Does the change have a direct security impact on an
application,
    flow, or firmware?
  - Examples: Crypto algorithm change, buffer overflow fix, parameter
    validation improvement, ...
- [] Breaking change?
- **Breaking change** - Will anyone consuming this change experience a
break
    in build or boot behavior?
- Examples: Add a new library class, move a module to a different repo,
call
    a function in a new library class in a pre-existing module, ...
- [ ] Includes tests?
  - **Tests** - Does the change include any explicit test code?
  - Examples: Unit tests, integration tests, robot tests, ...
- [ ] Includes documentation?
- **Documentation** - Does the change contain explicit documentation
additions
    outside direct code modifications (and comments)?
- Examples: Update readme file, add feature readme file, link to
documentation
    on an a separate Web page, ...

## How This Was Tested

Ensured mismatched library override was caught, and INF's with multiple
LIBRARY_CLASS definitions will not raise an error if one of the
definitions matches.

## Integration Instructions

N/A
jiaxinwu added a commit to jiaxinwu/edk2 that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2023
Root cause:
1. Before DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() is called, the return
address (tianocore#1) is pushed in shadow stack.
2. CET is disabled.
3. DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() returns to tianocore#1.
4. Page table is modified.
5. EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() is called, but the return
address (tianocore#2) is not pushed in shadow stack.
6. CET is enabled.
7. EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() returns to tianocore#2.
#CP exception happens because the actual return address (tianocore#2)
doesn't match the return address stored in shadow stack (tianocore#1).

Analysis:
Shadow stack will stop update after CET disable (DisableCet() in
DisableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect), but normal smi stack will be
continue updated with the function called and return
(DisableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect & EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect),
thus leading stack mismatch after CET re-enabled (EnableCet() in
EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect).

According SDM Vol 3, 6.15-Control Protection Exception:
Normal smi stack and shadow stack must be matched when CET enable,
otherwise CP Exception will happen, which is caused by a near RET
instruction.

CET is disabled in DisableCet(), while can be enabled in
EnableCet(). This way won't cause the problem because they are
implemented in a way that return address of DisableCet() is
poped out from shadow stack (Incsspq performs a pop to increases
the shadow stack) and EnableCet() doesn't use "RET" but "JMP" to
return to caller. So calling EnableCet() and DisableCet() doesn't
have the same issue as calling DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect()
and EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect().

With above root cause & analysis, define below 2 macros instead of
functions for WP & CET operation:
WRITE_UNPROTECT_RO_PAGES (Wp, Cet)
WRITE_PROTECT_RO_PAGES (Wp, Cet)
Because DisableCet() & EnableCet() must be in the same function
to avoid shadow stack and normal SMI stack mismatch.

Note: WRITE_UNPROTECT_RO_PAGES () must be called pair with
WRITE_PROTECT_RO_PAGES () in same function.

Change-Id: I4e126697efcd8dbfb4887da034d8691bfca969e3
Cc: Eric Dong <[email protected]>
Cc: Ray Ni <[email protected]>
Cc: Zeng Star <[email protected]>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <[email protected]>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <[email protected]>
jiaxinwu added a commit to jiaxinwu/edk2 that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2023
Root cause:
1. Before DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() is called, the return
address (tianocore#1) is pushed in shadow stack.
2. CET is disabled.
3. DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() returns to tianocore#1.
4. Page table is modified.
5. EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() is called, but the return
address (tianocore#2) is not pushed in shadow stack.
6. CET is enabled.
7. EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() returns to tianocore#2.
#CP exception happens because the actual return address (tianocore#2)
doesn't match the return address stored in shadow stack (tianocore#1).

Analysis:
Shadow stack will stop update after CET disable (DisableCet() in
DisableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect), but normal smi stack will be
continue updated with the function called and return
(DisableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect & EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect),
thus leading stack mismatch after CET re-enabled (EnableCet() in
EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect).

According SDM Vol 3, 6.15-Control Protection Exception:
Normal smi stack and shadow stack must be matched when CET enable,
otherwise CP Exception will happen, which is caused by a near RET
instruction.

CET is disabled in DisableCet(), while can be enabled in
EnableCet(). This way won't cause the problem because they are
implemented in a way that return address of DisableCet() is
poped out from shadow stack (Incsspq performs a pop to increases
the shadow stack) and EnableCet() doesn't use "RET" but "JMP" to
return to caller. So calling EnableCet() and DisableCet() doesn't
have the same issue as calling DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect()
and EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect().

With above root cause & analysis, define below 2 macros instead of
functions for WP & CET operation:
WRITE_UNPROTECT_RO_PAGES (Wp, Cet)
WRITE_PROTECT_RO_PAGES (Wp, Cet)
Because DisableCet() & EnableCet() must be in the same function
to avoid shadow stack and normal SMI stack mismatch.

Note: WRITE_UNPROTECT_RO_PAGES () must be called pair with
WRITE_PROTECT_RO_PAGES () in same function.

Change-Id: I4e126697efcd8dbfb4887da034d8691bfca969e3
Cc: Eric Dong <[email protected]>
Cc: Ray Ni <[email protected]>
Cc: Zeng Star <[email protected]>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <[email protected]>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <[email protected]>
jiaxinwu added a commit to jiaxinwu/edk2 that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2023
Root cause:
1. Before DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() is called, the return
address (tianocore#1) is pushed in shadow stack.
2. CET is disabled.
3. DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() returns to tianocore#1.
4. Page table is modified.
5. EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() is called, but the return
address (tianocore#2) is not pushed in shadow stack.
6. CET is enabled.
7. EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() returns to tianocore#2.
#CP exception happens because the actual return address (tianocore#2)
doesn't match the return address stored in shadow stack (tianocore#1).

Analysis:
Shadow stack will stop update after CET disable (DisableCet() in
DisableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect), but normal smi stack will be
continue updated with the function called and return
(DisableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect & EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect),
thus leading stack mismatch after CET re-enabled (EnableCet() in
EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect).

According SDM Vol 3, 6.15-Control Protection Exception:
Normal smi stack and shadow stack must be matched when CET enable,
otherwise CP Exception will happen, which is caused by a near RET
instruction.

CET is disabled in DisableCet(), while can be enabled in
EnableCet(). This way won't cause the problem because they are
implemented in a way that return address of DisableCet() is
poped out from shadow stack (Incsspq performs a pop to increases
the shadow stack) and EnableCet() doesn't use "RET" but "JMP" to
return to caller. So calling EnableCet() and DisableCet() doesn't
have the same issue as calling DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect()
and EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect().

With above root cause & analysis, define below 2 macros instead of
functions for WP & CET operation:
WRITE_UNPROTECT_RO_PAGES (Wp, Cet)
WRITE_PROTECT_RO_PAGES (Wp, Cet)
Because DisableCet() & EnableCet() must be in the same function
to avoid shadow stack and normal SMI stack mismatch.

Note: WRITE_UNPROTECT_RO_PAGES () must be called pair with
WRITE_PROTECT_RO_PAGES () in same function.

Change-Id: I4e126697efcd8dbfb4887da034d8691bfca969e3
Cc: Eric Dong <[email protected]>
Cc: Ray Ni <[email protected]>
Cc: Zeng Star <[email protected]>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <[email protected]>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <[email protected]>
jiaxinwu added a commit to jiaxinwu/edk2 that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2023
Root cause:
1. Before DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() is called, the return
address (tianocore#1) is pushed in shadow stack.
2. CET is disabled.
3. DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() returns to tianocore#1.
4. Page table is modified.
5. EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() is called, but the return
address (tianocore#2) is not pushed in shadow stack.
6. CET is enabled.
7. EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() returns to tianocore#2.
#CP exception happens because the actual return address (tianocore#2)
doesn't match the return address stored in shadow stack (tianocore#1).

Analysis:
Shadow stack will stop update after CET disable (DisableCet() in
DisableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect), but normal smi stack will be
continue updated with the function called and return
(DisableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect & EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect),
thus leading stack mismatch after CET re-enabled (EnableCet() in
EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect).

According SDM Vol 3, 6.15-Control Protection Exception:
Normal smi stack and shadow stack must be matched when CET enable,
otherwise CP Exception will happen, which is caused by a near RET
instruction.

CET is disabled in DisableCet(), while can be enabled in
EnableCet(). This way won't cause the problem because they are
implemented in a way that return address of DisableCet() is
poped out from shadow stack (Incsspq performs a pop to increases
the shadow stack) and EnableCet() doesn't use "RET" but "JMP" to
return to caller. So calling EnableCet() and DisableCet() doesn't
have the same issue as calling DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect()
and EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect().

With above root cause & analysis, define below 2 macros instead of
functions for WP & CET operation:
WRITE_UNPROTECT_RO_PAGES (Wp, Cet)
WRITE_PROTECT_RO_PAGES (Wp, Cet)
Because DisableCet() & EnableCet() must be in the same function
to avoid shadow stack and normal SMI stack mismatch.

Note: WRITE_UNPROTECT_RO_PAGES () must be called pair with
WRITE_PROTECT_RO_PAGES () in same function.

Change-Id: I4e126697efcd8dbfb4887da034d8691bfca969e3
Cc: Eric Dong <[email protected]>
Cc: Ray Ni <[email protected]>
Cc: Zeng Star <[email protected]>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <[email protected]>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <[email protected]>
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2023
Root cause:
1. Before DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() is called, the return
address (#1) is pushed in shadow stack.
2. CET is disabled.
3. DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() returns to #1.
4. Page table is modified.
5. EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() is called, but the return
address (#2) is not pushed in shadow stack.
6. CET is enabled.
7. EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() returns to #2.
#CP exception happens because the actual return address (#2)
doesn't match the return address stored in shadow stack (#1).

Analysis:
Shadow stack will stop update after CET disable (DisableCet() in
DisableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect), but normal smi stack will be
continue updated with the function called and return
(DisableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect & EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect),
thus leading stack mismatch after CET re-enabled (EnableCet() in
EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect).

According SDM Vol 3, 6.15-Control Protection Exception:
Normal smi stack and shadow stack must be matched when CET enable,
otherwise CP Exception will happen, which is caused by a near RET
instruction.

CET is disabled in DisableCet(), while can be enabled in
EnableCet(). This way won't cause the problem because they are
implemented in a way that return address of DisableCet() is
poped out from shadow stack (Incsspq performs a pop to increases
the shadow stack) and EnableCet() doesn't use "RET" but "JMP" to
return to caller. So calling EnableCet() and DisableCet() doesn't
have the same issue as calling DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect()
and EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect().

With above root cause & analysis, define below 2 macros instead of
functions for WP & CET operation:
WRITE_UNPROTECT_RO_PAGES (Wp, Cet)
WRITE_PROTECT_RO_PAGES (Wp, Cet)
Because DisableCet() & EnableCet() must be in the same function
to avoid shadow stack and normal SMI stack mismatch.

Note: WRITE_UNPROTECT_RO_PAGES () must be called pair with
WRITE_PROTECT_RO_PAGES () in same function.

Change-Id: I4e126697efcd8dbfb4887da034d8691bfca969e3
Cc: Eric Dong <[email protected]>
Cc: Ray Ni <[email protected]>
Cc: Zeng Star <[email protected]>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <[email protected]>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <[email protected]>
Flickdm pushed a commit to Flickdm/edk2 that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2024
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4535

Bug Details:
"PixieFail Bug tianocore#2"
CVE-2023-45230
CVSS 8.3 : CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H
CWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds
 of a Memory Buffer

Changes Overview:
> -UINT8 *
> +EFI_STATUS
>  Dhcp6AppendOption (
> -  IN OUT UINT8   *Buf,
> -  IN     UINT16  OptType,
> -  IN     UINT16  OptLen,
> -  IN     UINT8   *Data
> +  IN OUT EFI_DHCP6_PACKET  *Packet,
> +  IN OUT UINT8             **PacketCursor,
> +  IN     UINT16            OptType,
> +  IN     UINT16            OptLen,
> +  IN     UINT8             *Data
>    );

Dhcp6AppendOption() and variants can return errors now.  All callsites
are adapted accordingly.

It gets passed in EFI_DHCP6_PACKET as additional parameter ...

> +  //
> +  // Verify the PacketCursor is within the packet
> +  //
> +  if (  (*PacketCursor < Packet->Dhcp6.Option)
> +     || (*PacketCursor >= Packet->Dhcp6.Option +
 (Packet->Size - sizeof (EFI_DHCP6_HEADER))))
> +  {
> +    return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
> +  }

... so it can look at Packet->Size when checking buffer space.
Also to allow Packet->Length updates.

Lots of checks added.

Cc: Saloni Kasbekar <[email protected]>
Cc: Zachary Clark-williams <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Doug Flick [MSFT] <[email protected]>
Flickdm pushed a commit to Flickdm/edk2 that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4535

Bug Details:
PixieFail Bug tianocore#2
CVE-2023-45230
CVSS 8.3 : CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H
CWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds
 of a Memory Buffer

Changes Overview:
> -UINT8 *
> +EFI_STATUS
>  Dhcp6AppendOption (
> -  IN OUT UINT8   *Buf,
> -  IN     UINT16  OptType,
> -  IN     UINT16  OptLen,
> -  IN     UINT8   *Data
> +  IN OUT EFI_DHCP6_PACKET  *Packet,
> +  IN OUT UINT8             **PacketCursor,
> +  IN     UINT16            OptType,
> +  IN     UINT16            OptLen,
> +  IN     UINT8             *Data
>    );

Dhcp6AppendOption() and variants can return errors now.  All callsites
are adapted accordingly.

It gets passed in EFI_DHCP6_PACKET as additional parameter ...

> +  //
> +  // Verify the PacketCursor is within the packet
> +  //
> +  if (  (*PacketCursor < Packet->Dhcp6.Option)
> +     || (*PacketCursor >= Packet->Dhcp6.Option +
 (Packet->Size - sizeof (EFI_DHCP6_HEADER))))
> +  {
> +    return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
> +  }

... so it can look at Packet->Size when checking buffer space.
Also to allow Packet->Length updates.

Lots of checks added.

Cc: Saloni Kasbekar <[email protected]>
Cc: Zachary Clark-williams <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Doug Flick [MSFT] <[email protected]>
patchew-importer pushed a commit to patchew-project/edk2 that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
--_000_MN6PR11MB82443B73244CEF84481629F08C7A2MN6PR11MB8244namp_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

All,
This mail is to bring another approach to solve the stack-overflow due to n=
ested interrupts. Michael solved this problem in OVMF through NestedInterru=
ptTplLib.

I made a draft patch as attached "DxeCore.diff". The patch simply to avoid =
the interrupt in enable state when TPL is dropped to the interrupted TPL. T=
he interrupt will be enabled later through "IRET".

So, a timer driver has two ways to implement its timer interrupt handler:

1.      Do raise/restore TPL in the TimerInterruptHandler(). But call the A=
PIs in NestedInterruptTplLib.

2.      Do not raise/restore TPL in the TimerInterruptHandler(). So that on=
ly DxeCore restores the TPL. And when DxeCore restores the TPL, the interru=
pt is not enabled when TPL is dropped to the interrupted TPL (as it will be=
 enabled later by "IRET").

Implementing the logic in DxeCore does not prevent the TimerInterruptHandle=
r() from implementing the way tianocore#1.
Agree on the draft patch?

My 2nd question is can we set a rule that TimerInterruptHandler() should NO=
T restore TPL so that way tianocore#2 (changing DxeCore) is enough to solve the stac=
k overflow issue due to nested interrupts.

I was aware of the discussion between Laszlo and Michael in end of 2022 but=
 never dig deeply as today into this problem.
I really appreciate the long discussion in the bugzilla (https://bugzilla.t=
ianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D4162) and comments in NestedInterruptTplLib.=
 I learned a lot from them and they are quite interesting!

Thanks,
Ray

-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#114369): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/114369
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/103950154/1787277
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/leave/3901457/1787277/102458076=
/xyzzy [[email protected]]
-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-

<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
	{font-family:"Cambria Math";
	panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:DengXian;
	panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Calibri;
	panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Aptos;}
@font-face
	{font-family:DengXian;
	panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin:0cm;
	font-size:11.0pt;
	font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
	mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	color:#0563C1;
	text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
	{mso-style-priority:34;
	margin:0cm;
	text-indent:21.0pt;
	font-size:11.0pt;
	font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
	mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;}
span.EmailStyle17
	{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
	font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
	color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
	{mso-style-type:export-only;
	font-size:11.0pt;
	font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
/* Page Definitions */
@page WordSection1
	{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
	margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
	{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
	{mso-list-id:1439645819;
	mso-list-type:hybrid;
	mso-list-template-ids:-972123134 722654836 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715;}
@list l0:level1
	{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	margin-left:18.0pt;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l0:level2
	{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
	mso-level-text:"%2\)";
	mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	margin-left:44.0pt;
	text-indent:-22.0pt;}
@list l0:level3
	{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
	mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:right;
	margin-left:66.0pt;
	text-indent:-22.0pt;}
@list l0:level4
	{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	margin-left:88.0pt;
	text-indent:-22.0pt;}
@list l0:level5
	{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
	mso-level-text:"%5\)";
	mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	margin-left:110.0pt;
	text-indent:-22.0pt;}
@list l0:level6
	{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
	mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:right;
	margin-left:132.0pt;
	text-indent:-22.0pt;}
@list l0:level7
	{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	margin-left:154.0pt;
	text-indent:-22.0pt;}
@list l0:level8
	{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
	mso-level-text:"%8\)";
	mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	margin-left:176.0pt;
	text-indent:-22.0pt;}
@list l0:level9
	{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
	mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:right;
	margin-left:198.0pt;
	text-indent:-22.0pt;}
ol
	{margin-bottom:0cm;}
ul
	{margin-bottom:0cm;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="ZH-CN" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style="word-wrap:break-word;text-justify-trim:punctuation">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt">All,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt">This mail is to bring another approach to solve the stack-overflow due to nested interrupts. Michael solved this problem in OVMF through NestedInterruptTplLib.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt">I made a draft patch as attached &#8220;DxeCore.diff&#8221;. The patch simply to avoid the interrupt in enable state when TPL is dropped to the interrupted TPL. The interrupt will be enabled later through
 &#8220;IRET&#8221;.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt">So, a timer driver has two ways to implement its timer interrupt handler:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:18.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1">
<![if !supportLists]><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">1.<span style="font:7.0pt &quot;Times New Roman&quot;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
</span></span></span><![endif]><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt">Do raise/restore TPL in the TimerInterruptHandler(). But call the APIs in NestedInterruptTplLib.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:18.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1">
<![if !supportLists]><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">2.<span style="font:7.0pt &quot;Times New Roman&quot;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
</span></span></span><![endif]><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt">Do not raise/restore TPL in the TimerInterruptHandler(). So that only DxeCore restores the TPL. And when DxeCore restores the TPL, the interrupt is not enabled when TPL is dropped to
 the interrupted TPL (as it will be enabled later by &#8220;IRET&#8221;).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt">Implementing the logic in DxeCore does not prevent the TimerInterruptHandler() from implementing the way tianocore#1.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt">Agree on the draft patch?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt">My 2<sup>nd</sup> question is can we set a rule that TimerInterruptHandler() should NOT restore TPL so that way tianocore#2 (changing DxeCore) is enough to solve the stack overflow issue due to nested
 interrupts.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt">I was aware of the discussion between Laszlo and Michael in end of 2022 but never dig deeply as today into this problem.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt">I really appreciate the long discussion in the bugzilla (<a href="https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4162">https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4162</a>) and comments in
 NestedInterruptTplLib. I learned a lot from them and they are quite interesting!<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:&quot;Aptos&quot;,sans-serif;color:black;mso-ligatures:none"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:&quot;Aptos&quot;,sans-serif;color:black;mso-ligatures:none">Thanks,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:&quot;Aptos&quot;,sans-serif;color:black;mso-ligatures:none">Ray</span><span lang="EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>

<div width="1" style="color:white;clear:both">_._,_._,_</div>
<hr>

Groups.io Links:<p>

    You receive all messages sent to this group.

<p>
<a target="_blank" href="https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/114369">View/Reply Online (#114369)</a> |

|

  <a target="_blank" href="https://groups.io/mt/103950154/1787277">Mute This Topic</a>

| <a href="https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/post">New Topic</a>

<br>

<a href="https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/editsub/1787277">Your Subscription</a> |
<a href="mailto:[email protected]">Contact Group Owner</a> |

<a href="https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/leave/3901457/1787277/102458076/xyzzy">Unsubscribe</a>

 [[email protected]]<br>
<div width="1" style="color:white;clear:both">_._,_._,_</div>

Message-Id: <MN6PR11MB82443B73244CEF84481629F08C7A2@MN6PR11MB8244.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2024
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4535

Bug Details:
PixieFail Bug #2
CVE-2023-45230
CVSS 8.3 : CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H
CWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds
 of a Memory Buffer

Changes Overview:
> -UINT8 *
> +EFI_STATUS
>  Dhcp6AppendOption (
> -  IN OUT UINT8   *Buf,
> -  IN     UINT16  OptType,
> -  IN     UINT16  OptLen,
> -  IN     UINT8   *Data
> +  IN OUT EFI_DHCP6_PACKET  *Packet,
> +  IN OUT UINT8             **PacketCursor,
> +  IN     UINT16            OptType,
> +  IN     UINT16            OptLen,
> +  IN     UINT8             *Data
>    );

Dhcp6AppendOption() and variants can return errors now.  All callsites
are adapted accordingly.

It gets passed in EFI_DHCP6_PACKET as additional parameter ...

> +  //
> +  // Verify the PacketCursor is within the packet
> +  //
> +  if (  (*PacketCursor < Packet->Dhcp6.Option)
> +     || (*PacketCursor >= Packet->Dhcp6.Option +
 (Packet->Size - sizeof (EFI_DHCP6_HEADER))))
> +  {
> +    return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
> +  }

... so it can look at Packet->Size when checking buffer space.
Also to allow Packet->Length updates.

Lots of checks added.

Cc: Saloni Kasbekar <[email protected]>
Cc: Zachary Clark-williams <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Doug Flick [MSFT] <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Saloni Kasbekar <[email protected]>
nicklela pushed a commit to changab/edk2 that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4535

Bug Details:
PixieFail Bug tianocore#2
CVE-2023-45230
CVSS 8.3 : CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H
CWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds
 of a Memory Buffer

Changes Overview:
> -UINT8 *
> +EFI_STATUS
>  Dhcp6AppendOption (
> -  IN OUT UINT8   *Buf,
> -  IN     UINT16  OptType,
> -  IN     UINT16  OptLen,
> -  IN     UINT8   *Data
> +  IN OUT EFI_DHCP6_PACKET  *Packet,
> +  IN OUT UINT8             **PacketCursor,
> +  IN     UINT16            OptType,
> +  IN     UINT16            OptLen,
> +  IN     UINT8             *Data
>    );

Dhcp6AppendOption() and variants can return errors now.  All callsites
are adapted accordingly.

It gets passed in EFI_DHCP6_PACKET as additional parameter ...

> +  //
> +  // Verify the PacketCursor is within the packet
> +  //
> +  if (  (*PacketCursor < Packet->Dhcp6.Option)
> +     || (*PacketCursor >= Packet->Dhcp6.Option +
 (Packet->Size - sizeof (EFI_DHCP6_HEADER))))
> +  {
> +    return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
> +  }

... so it can look at Packet->Size when checking buffer space.
Also to allow Packet->Length updates.

Lots of checks added.

Bug 4457168

Cc: Saloni Kasbekar <[email protected]>
Cc: Zachary Clark-williams <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Doug Flick [MSFT] <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Saloni Kasbekar <[email protected]>
Change-Id: Icd0135ce27dabed9e426dac845d9ef9f66bb5b56
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/c/3rdparty/edk2/+/3073479
Reviewed-by: svcacv <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: svc-sw-mobile-l4t <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Brasen <[email protected]>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Jeff Brasen <[email protected]>
@kraxel kraxel mentioned this pull request Jun 13, 2024
zer0def pushed a commit to zer0def/edk2 that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2024
- working HDEC-based TimerDxe
- TB-based TimerLib
- Shell needed the unicode collation driver.
- set correct PcdShellFile to have the shell be recognised by BDS
- TB frequency set in Ipl today through the Pcr, at some point
  this should be set through a PCD by a FDT-parsing DXE.

Fixes issue tianocore#2
Closes Milestone UEFI Shell Boot

Signed-off-by: Andrei Warkentin <[email protected]>
mmisono pushed a commit to mmisono/edk2 that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2024
Root cause:
1. Before DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() is called, the return
address (tianocore#1) is pushed in shadow stack.
2. CET is disabled.
3. DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() returns to tianocore#1.
4. Page table is modified.
5. EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() is called, but the return
address (tianocore#2) is not pushed in shadow stack.
6. CET is enabled.
7. EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() returns to tianocore#2.
#CP exception happens because the actual return address (tianocore#2)
doesn't match the return address stored in shadow stack (tianocore#1).

Analysis:
Shadow stack will stop update after CET disable (DisableCet() in
DisableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect), but normal smi stack will be
continue updated with the function called and return
(DisableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect & EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect),
thus leading stack mismatch after CET re-enabled (EnableCet() in
EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect).

According SDM Vol 3, 6.15-Control Protection Exception:
Normal smi stack and shadow stack must be matched when CET enable,
otherwise CP Exception will happen, which is caused by a near RET
instruction.

CET is disabled in DisableCet(), while can be enabled in
EnableCet(). This way won't cause the problem because they are
implemented in a way that return address of DisableCet() is
poped out from shadow stack (Incsspq performs a pop to increases
the shadow stack) and EnableCet() doesn't use "RET" but "JMP" to
return to caller. So calling EnableCet() and DisableCet() doesn't
have the same issue as calling DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect()
and EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect().

With above root cause & analysis, define below 2 macros instead of
functions for WP & CET operation:
WRITE_UNPROTECT_RO_PAGES (Wp, Cet)
WRITE_PROTECT_RO_PAGES (Wp, Cet)
Because DisableCet() & EnableCet() must be in the same function
to avoid shadow stack and normal SMI stack mismatch.

Note: WRITE_UNPROTECT_RO_PAGES () must be called pair with
WRITE_PROTECT_RO_PAGES () in same function.

Change-Id: I4e126697efcd8dbfb4887da034d8691bfca969e3
Cc: Eric Dong <[email protected]>
Cc: Ray Ni <[email protected]>
Cc: Zeng Star <[email protected]>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <[email protected]>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <[email protected]>
jiaxinwu added a commit to jiaxinwu/edk2 that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2024
This patch does not impact functionality. It aims to clarify the
synchronization flow between the BSP and APs to enhance code
readability and understanding:

Steps tianocore#6 and tianocore#11 are the basic synchronization requirements for all
cases.

Steps tianocore#1 and tianocore#2 are additional requirements if the
MmCpuSyncModeTradition mode is selected.

Steps tianocore#1, tianocore#2, tianocore#3, tianocore#4, tianocore#5, tianocore#7, tianocore#8, tianocore#9, and tianocore#10 are additional
requirements if the system needs to configure the MTRR.

Steps tianocore#9 and tianocore#10 are additional requirements if the system needs to
support the mSmmDebugAgentSupport.

Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <[email protected]>
jiaxinwu added a commit to jiaxinwu/edk2 that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2024
This patch does not impact functionality. It aims to clarify the
synchronization flow between the BSP and APs to enhance code
readability and understanding:

Steps tianocore#6 and tianocore#11 are the basic synchronization requirements for all
cases.

Steps tianocore#1 and tianocore#2 are additional requirements if the
MmCpuSyncModeTradition mode is selected.

Steps tianocore#1, tianocore#2, tianocore#3, tianocore#4, tianocore#5, tianocore#7, tianocore#8, tianocore#9, and tianocore#10 are additional
requirements if the system needs to configure the MTRR.

Steps tianocore#9 and tianocore#10 are additional requirements if the system needs to
support the mSmmDebugAgentSupport.

Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <[email protected]>
jiaxinwu added a commit to jiaxinwu/edk2 that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2024
This patch does not impact functionality. It aims to clarify the
synchronization flow between the BSP and APs to enhance code
readability and understanding:

Steps tianocore#6 and tianocore#11 are the basic synchronization requirements for all
cases.

Steps tianocore#1 is additional requirements if the MmCpuSyncModeTradition
mode is selected.

Steps tianocore#1, tianocore#2, tianocore#3, tianocore#4, tianocore#5, tianocore#7, tianocore#8, tianocore#9, and tianocore#10 are additional
requirements if the system needs to configure the MTRR.

Steps tianocore#9 and tianocore#10 are additional requirements if the system needs to
support the mSmmDebugAgentSupport.

Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <[email protected]>
jiaxinwu added a commit to jiaxinwu/edk2 that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2024
… func

This patch is for PiSmmCpuDxeSmm driver to add one round wait/release sync
for BSP and AP to perform the SMM CPU Platform Hook before executing MMI
Handler: SmmCpuPlatformHookBeforeMmiHandler (). With the function, SMM CPU
driver can perform the platform specific items after one round BSP and AP
sync (to make sure all APs in SMI) and before the MMI handlers.

After the change, steps tianocore#1 and tianocore#2 are additional requirements if the
MmCpuSyncModeTradition mode is selected.

Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <[email protected]>
jiaxinwu added a commit to jiaxinwu/edk2 that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2024
This patch does not impact functionality. It aims to clarify the
synchronization flow between the BSP and APs to enhance code
readability and understanding:

Steps tianocore#6 and tianocore#11 are the basic synchronization requirements for all
cases.

Steps tianocore#1 is additional requirements if the MmCpuSyncModeTradition
mode is selected.

Steps tianocore#1, tianocore#2, tianocore#3, tianocore#4, tianocore#5, tianocore#7, tianocore#8, tianocore#9, and tianocore#10 are additional
requirements if the system needs to configure the MTRR.

Steps tianocore#9 and tianocore#10 are additional requirements if the system needs to
support the mSmmDebugAgentSupport.

Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <[email protected]>
jiaxinwu added a commit to jiaxinwu/edk2 that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2024
… func

This patch is for PiSmmCpuDxeSmm driver to add one round wait/release sync
for BSP and AP to perform the SMM CPU Platform Hook before executing MMI
Handler: SmmCpuPlatformHookBeforeMmiHandler (). With the function, SMM CPU
driver can perform the platform specific items after one round BSP and AP
sync (to make sure all APs in SMI) and before the MMI handlers.

After the change, steps tianocore#1 and tianocore#2 are additional requirements if the
MmCpuSyncModeTradition mode is selected.

Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <[email protected]>
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2024
This patch does not impact functionality. It aims to clarify the
synchronization flow between the BSP and APs to enhance code
readability and understanding:

Steps #6 and #11 are the basic synchronization requirements for all
cases.

Steps #1 is additional requirements if the MmCpuSyncModeTradition
mode is selected.

Steps #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #7, #8, #9, and #10 are additional
requirements if the system needs to configure the MTRR.

Steps #9 and #10 are additional requirements if the system needs to
support the mSmmDebugAgentSupport.

Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <[email protected]>
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2024
… func

This patch is for PiSmmCpuDxeSmm driver to add one round wait/release sync
for BSP and AP to perform the SMM CPU Platform Hook before executing MMI
Handler: SmmCpuPlatformHookBeforeMmiHandler (). With the function, SMM CPU
driver can perform the platform specific items after one round BSP and AP
sync (to make sure all APs in SMI) and before the MMI handlers.

After the change, steps #1 and #2 are additional requirements if the
MmCpuSyncModeTradition mode is selected.

Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants