Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(duplicated_node_checker): add duplicate nodes to ignore (#1070) #488

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2024

Conversation

tkimura4
Copy link
Collaborator

@tkimura4 tkimura4 commented Jul 11, 2024

Description

( autowarefoundation/autoware.universe#7959 )
autowarefoundation#1070
Hotfix to beta/v0.29.0

Tests performed

Not applicable.

Effects on system behavior

Not applicable.

Interface changes

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

  • There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

…efoundation#1070)

* feat(duplicated_node_checker): add duplicate nodes to ignore

Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Koldaev <[email protected]>

* pre-commit

Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Koldaev <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Koldaev <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Dmitrii Koldaev <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Tomoya Kimura <[email protected]>
@tkimura4 tkimura4 requested review from shmpwk and removed request for isamu-takagi and ito-san July 11, 2024 05:43
@shmpwk shmpwk merged commit d837296 into beta/v0.29.0 Jul 11, 2024
14 checks passed
@shmpwk shmpwk deleted the fix/add_duplicate_nodes_to_ignore-v0.29.0 branch July 11, 2024 06:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants