Revert "vote: gozssky as TiKV reviwer"

[tisonkun]

Reverts #141

violate governance rule

[ti-chi-bot]

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

• BusyJay

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

[JaySon-Huang]

(not important) I think it should be "violate" instead of "violet"?👀

[tisonkun]

@JaySon-Huang yes. Updated.

[skyzh]

This seems to be the first time that our rules are violated. After this accident has happened, I believe for now all of the community members should have been acknowledged the promotion rules.

So as for this PR, to simplify the process, I suggest that we simply wait for 3 days. If there are no vetoes and this promotion meets the requirements, we may close this PR and assume #141 valid.

After all, thanks for @gozssky 's contribution!

+1 (binding)

[tisonkun]

@skyzh thanks for your suggestion. I highly respect @gozssky's contribution, but hesitated to make a special case that

close this PR and assume #141 valid.

or something. If we allow this time, what about the next time we continue "assume an invalid vote passed". We should create as less exceptions as possible.

It's fine to the nominator proposes once more. We don't have to rush things or chasing just in place convenience, but keep the rules we wrote down.

[skyzh]

Looks good to me. We could go over the process again.