-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 721
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pdctl: support show keyspace group primary #6747
Conversation
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]>
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #6747 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 74.18% 74.22% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 411 411
Lines 43126 43057 -69
==========================================
- Hits 31992 31957 -35
+ Misses 8265 8224 -41
- Partials 2869 2876 +7
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]>
pkg/keyspace/tso_keyspace_group.go
Outdated
path := fmt.Sprintf("/ms/%d/tso/00000/primary", m.clusterID) | ||
if id != utils.DefaultKeyspaceGroupID { | ||
path = fmt.Sprintf("/ms/%d/tso/keyspace_groups/election/%05d/primary", m.clusterID, id) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This code is duplicated in many places
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will move them to mcsutil
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]>
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ func showKeyspaceGroupPrimaryCommandFunc(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) { | |||
cmd.Printf("Failed to parse the keyspace group ID: %s\n", err) | |||
return | |||
} | |||
r, err := doRequest(cmd, fmt.Sprintf("%s/%s/primary", keyspaceGroupsPrefix, args[0]), http.MethodGet, http.Header{}) | |||
r, err := doRequest(cmd, fmt.Sprintf("%s/%s?get_param=primary", keyspaceGroupsPrefix, args[0]), http.MethodGet, http.Header{}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it should be a bool, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"%s/%s?only_primary_member=" so?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe you can google it to find the best practice?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe it is better, "%s/%s?fields=primary" and return { id:0, primary:""}
ref:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18235546/way-to-specify-resources-fields-list-in-restful-api-request
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68979696/restful-api-including-additional-fields
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]>
ref #6747, ref #6748, ref #6749 Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>
/merge |
@lhy1024: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 6f12b4c
|
) ref tikv#6747, ref tikv#6748, ref tikv#6749 Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>
close tikv#6746 Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ti-chi-bot[bot] <108142056+ti-chi-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
close tikv#6746 Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ti-chi-bot[bot] <108142056+ti-chi-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
) ref tikv#6747, ref tikv#6748, ref tikv#6749 Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>
close tikv#6746 Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ti-chi-bot[bot] <108142056+ti-chi-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: Close #6746
What is changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Release note