-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 721
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
server: skip the engine key when match store label #8486
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #8486 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 77.30% 77.41% +0.11%
==========================================
Files 472 472
Lines 61789 61782 -7
==========================================
+ Hits 47766 47831 +65
+ Misses 10448 10381 -67
+ Partials 3575 3570 -5
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
/check-issue-triage-complete |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, But LocationLabels
seems to have been designed to be equivalent to Labels
(if not, ignore it), but now there are other concepts for Labels
, such as engine
. So it's not clear if there are other places where this gap exists
valid: true, | ||
expectError: "placement rules is disabled", | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it unnecessary?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think yes, cuz we cannot add a TiFlash store when the placement rule is set to disable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is no guarantee that LocationLabels should be equivalent to Labels.
@okJiang: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: JmPotato, nolouch, okJiang The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
close tikv#8480 Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
close tikv#8480 Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
close tikv#8480 Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
close tikv#8480 Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
close tikv#8480 Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
close #8480 Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>
close #8480 Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ti-chi-bot[bot] <108142056+ti-chi-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
close #8480 Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>
close #8480 Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>
close #8480 Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>
close #8480 Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Purelind <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ti-chi-bot[bot] <108142056+ti-chi-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: Close #8480.
What is changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Release note