-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 284
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add try catch to connect() #2674
Open
ygpark80
wants to merge
1
commit into
tsedio:production
Choose a base branch
from
ygpark80:production
base: production
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But adding this try catch will hide the connection error. I’m not favorable to do add that without loing the error.
Also I prefer to catch the error only if an option is enable. By default, the error must be thrown.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggestion:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not a big fan of creating lots of options since ioredis already has tons. lol. If this is used in a serverless environment, not all resources may be available on startup. However, registerConnectionProvider uses lazyConnect: true and tries to connect to Redis during component initialization. But if it fails, the whole server won't start up, which I think is a bigger problem than losing the error.
I think there is another option: do not use lazyConnect: true and leave ioredis as is. ioredis will use the auto-reconnect feature if an incident like mine happens. You don't have to wait until the connection is ready because ioredis already handles (queues) commands internally.
I think Ts.ED should not let people have too many options, as developers should just go ahead and write logic. Adding an option, in my humble opinion, is unnecessary and also confusing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok I understand your point, but lazyConnect is here to solve another issue, and it's normal to stop the bootstrap server when the redis connection isn't available, because this problem will cause other issuer later on the runtime.
We can use the lazyConnect option to address your issue and keep the existing behavior as is it.
I think this is the better option for you and me :D
See you
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good. I'll do some work sometime this week.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let me know when it's ok for you ;)