Update Topiary dependencies to handle (.) in nickel format
#1753
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The curried version of the field access operator `(.)` wasn't handled properly by the Nickel tree-sitter grammar, and thus Topiary, and thus `nickel format`. This commit simply updates to the latest version of Topiary. We also switch from using tree-sitter-nickel from crates.io to using the same version as Topiary (from the repository).
vkleen
approved these changes
Jan 9, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The curried version of the field access operator
(.)wasn't handled properly by the Nickel tree-sitter grammar, and thus Topiary, and thusnickel format.This commit simply updates to the latest version of Topiary. We also switch from using tree-sitter-nickel from crates.io to match the same version as Topiary (from the git repository).