Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[20438] Update error codes #164

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 19, 2021
Merged

Conversation

SergioFierro
Copy link
Collaborator

@SergioFierro SergioFierro commented Mar 15, 2021

Ticket

  • 20438

Description

  • Use new range 604XX of error codes

Commit message

  • fix: Update error codes

@SergioFierro SergioFierro self-assigned this Mar 15, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 15, 2021

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (dev@c5e04dd). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##             dev     #164   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage       ?   86.94%           
  Complexity     ?      244           
======================================
  Files          ?       44           
  Lines          ?      996           
  Branches       ?       94           
======================================
  Hits           ?      866           
  Misses         ?       80           
  Partials       ?       50           
Flag Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
unittests 86.94% <0.00%> (?) 0.00% <0.00%> (?%)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@SergioFierro SergioFierro merged commit 308d053 into dev Mar 19, 2021
@yafuquen yafuquen changed the title [ACCSEC-20438] Update error codes [20438] Update error codes Oct 12, 2021
@yafuquen yafuquen deleted the sfierro/ACCSEC-20438-Update-error-codes branch February 1, 2022 20:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants