-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rewrite transport #25
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f125f57
First pass at transport rewrite.
ceff358
Have transports share a request cache.
a6b249a
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into rewrite-transport
fd397ab
Add support for new API.
68266d6
Merge branch '42-multiple-elements-initializaiton' into rewrite-trans…
bdb56e3
Support original API.
7632109
Add request cache mock for tests.
6674bd1
Add tests.
77656a5
Work on test suite.
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why not just have '6' instead of 'maxConcurrentConnections || 6', I don't see how maxConcurrentConnections could be instantiated at this point?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maxConcurrentConnections
is a static variable shared between eachTransport
instance. So if you have the following code:The final value for
maxConcurrentConnections
should be4
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
aha, makes sense. I was considering the single transport case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One more thing we should discuss is if it makes sense to have the transports share a cache. Might make more sense to give each transport its own cache instance, reducing the coupling between the activity on the inputs.