Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Disable scaladoc during packaging for scala 2.10" #1006

Merged

Conversation

kailuowang
Copy link
Contributor

@kailuowang kailuowang commented Apr 27, 2016

Disabling docs for scala 2.10 can't be achieved by this change alone. Sonatype release requires javadoc jars, this is now blocking the 0.5.0 release. My proposal is that we revert this for now and find a more comprehensive solution for #898 later. I know it's kicking the can down the road, but this PR itself does not bring any value to 0.5.0, so I think it is sensible to not having it blocking the release.

Update: #898 is not included in the 0.5.0 release.

@ceedubs
Copy link
Contributor

ceedubs commented Apr 27, 2016

👍

@travisbrown
Copy link
Contributor

👍

@non
Copy link
Contributor

non commented Apr 27, 2016

👍 Thanks!

@non non merged commit b2ad9f2 into typelevel:master Apr 27, 2016
@mikejcurry
Copy link
Contributor

Hey folks - sorry about that. Thanks for reverting.

@ceedubs
Copy link
Contributor

ceedubs commented May 21, 2016

@kailuowang This has come up again in #1041. I noticed that circe is doing this to omit sources in the doc. Did you ever try anything like that without changing publishArtifact in (Compile, packageDoc)? It seems to make coreJVM/compile:doc no longer fail. And it seems like it must satisfy sonatype, because circe is publishing there.

@kailuowang
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ceedubs yeah, that might work, let me give it a try (i wonder if it still creates the java-doc jar and thus pass the sonatype test)

@kailuowang
Copy link
Contributor Author

seems working, PR #1051

@kailuowang kailuowang deleted the revert-959-disable-scaladoc-2.10-publish branch May 21, 2016 01:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants