Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Topic/release notes 0.2.0 #503

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 1, 2015
Merged

Topic/release notes 0.2.0 #503

merged 5 commits into from
Sep 1, 2015

Conversation

non
Copy link
Contributor

@non non commented Sep 1, 2015

I reviewed the git logs since v0.1.2 to find the relevant commits,
manually checked the commit authors against our current list, and
tried to summarize the work and changes that users should expect
to see.

For reference, the command I used was git log v0.1.2..HEAD.

(This PR also includes the version tags, and a change I needed to
make for the build to succeed.)

Currently I'm unable to get through a clean cross-build for
2.10 and 2.11 with both JVM and JS. Even using additional
memory (4G) I seem to run out late in the 2.11 build/test
after building and testing 2.10.

This suggests a memory leak in SBT or scalac. If we remove
the clean, I should be able to "stage" the release by
building ahead of time. The commit also removes parallel
execution from the JS step for the same reason.
I reviewed the git logs since v0.1.2 to find the relevant commits,
manually checked the commit authors against our current list, and
tried to summarize the work and changes that users should expect
to see.

For reference, the command I used was `git log v0.1.2..HEAD`.
@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 62.90%

Merging #503 into master will not affect coverage as of de83274

@@            master   #503   diff @@
=====================================
  Files          154    154       
  Stmts         2359   2359       
  Branches        66     66       
  Methods          0      0       
=====================================
  Hit           1484   1484       
  Partial          0      0       
  Missed         875    875       

Review entire Coverage Diff as of de83274

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

* `Choice[F[_, _]]`
* `Group[A]`
* `MonadReader[F[_, _], R]`
* `Stream[A]` and `StreamT[F[_], A]`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Streaming right?

@adelbertc
Copy link
Contributor

👍 LGTM

@stew
Copy link
Contributor

stew commented Sep 1, 2015

👍 thanks!

stew added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2015
@stew stew merged commit 31671f7 into master Sep 1, 2015
@non non deleted the topic/release-notes-0.2.0 branch September 5, 2015 13:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants