Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Adds additional tests for Option T #692

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 24, 2015
Merged

Adds additional tests for Option T #692

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 24, 2015

Conversation

mikejcurry
Copy link
Contributor

  • Tests consistency between flatMap and flatMapF
  • Tests consistency between Show[OptionT] instance and OptionT.show

@mikejcurry
Adds additional tests for Option T
9714421 
* Tests consistency between flatMap and flatMapF
* Tests consistency between Show[OptionT] instance and OptionT.show
@mikejcurry mikejcurry mentioned this pull request Nov 21, 2015
Closed
@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 84.12%

Merging #692 into master will increase coverage by +0.23% as of 88e4119

@@            master    #692   diff @@
======================================
  Files          162     162       
  Stmts         2217    2217       
  Branches        74      74       
  Methods          0       0       
======================================
+ Hit           1860    1865     +5
  Partial          0       0       
+ Missed         357     352     -5

Review entire Coverage Diff as of 88e4119

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

@ceedubs
Copy link
Contributor

ceedubs commented Nov 22, 2015

👍 thanks!

@non
Copy link
Contributor

non commented Nov 24, 2015

👍 great thanks!

non added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2015
@non
Merge pull request #692 from mikejcurry/option-t-tests
b50dd05 
Adds additional tests for Option T
@non non merged commit b50dd05 into typelevel:master Nov 24, 2015
@mikejcurry mikejcurry deleted the option-t-tests branch December 11, 2015 20:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@mikejcurry @codecov-io @ceedubs @non