-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proof of concept creating a cats-kernel module for Cats/Algebra. #786
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,7 +1,14 @@ | ||
package cats | ||
package std | ||
|
||
trait BigIntInstances extends algebra.std.BigIntInstances { | ||
trait BigIntInstances { | ||
implicit val bigIntAlgebra: BigIntAlgebra = | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think this is out of the scope of this PR, but just to jot it down while I'm thinking of it: is there any benefit to having this statically typed to There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. What are you proposing as an alternative? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I was just proposing There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Also, why not the |
||
new BigIntAlgebra | ||
|
||
implicit val bigIntShow: Show[BigInt] = | ||
Show.fromToString[BigInt] | ||
} | ||
|
||
class BigIntAlgebra extends Order[BigInt] { | ||
def compare(x: BigInt, y: BigInt): Int = x compare y | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the group here can be useful no? (Allows you do use some Monads that want Monoids on some values, e.g. Writer?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You mean plain
Group
rather thanCommutativeGroup
? Yes, agreed.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, sorry. I overlooked that you just removed the CommutativeGroup, but that's another issue to keep in mind with standard instances: many standard ones are commutative, but kernel won't have it, so something for algebra to keep in mind.