Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define Apply.product in term of ap and map #793

Conversation

OlivierBlanvillain
Copy link
Contributor

Following my comment on #740, I tried to define Monoidal's product directly on Apply.

- Remove all equivalent definition of `product` introduced by typelevel#555
- Changes `cats.syntax.all._` to `import cats.syntax.monoidal._` in doc
- Minor type argument spacing
@julienrf
Copy link
Contributor

julienrf commented Jan 9, 2016

Hi Olivier,

Did you run some benchmarks on this?

@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 88.37%

Merging #793 into master will increase coverage by +0.07% as of 7cf41b3

@@            master    #793   diff @@
======================================
  Files          166     166       
  Stmts         2291    2279    -12
  Branches        75      75       
  Methods          0       0       
======================================
- Hit           2023    2014     -9
  Partial          0       0       
+ Missed         268     265     -3

Review entire Coverage Diff as of 7cf41b3

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

@OlivierBlanvillain OlivierBlanvillain deleted the apply-defines-product branch January 9, 2016 16:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants