-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 138
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support refined types #571
Conversation
81a96b3
to
f32f410
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #571 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 95.54% 95.13% -0.42%
==========================================
Files 63 65 +2
Lines 1101 1131 +30
Branches 8 11 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 1052 1076 +24
- Misses 49 55 +6
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
781781c
to
7194133
Compare
7194133
to
9da4122
Compare
Rebased |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚀 That is awesome! Thanks! Checked it in my project where refined types worked inside Option
monads, no regressions noticed.
I left as usual a couple of build / codestyle comments; but they are not critical.
9da4122
to
007c323
Compare
New
frameless-refined
moduleCloses #257