-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 247
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add mesh based cap for use by S2SW and HAFSW #1131
Add mesh based cap for use by S2SW and HAFSW #1131
Conversation
Comparing 20210322.180000.out_pnt.points .........NOT OK Comparing 20130401.060000.out_pnt.points .........NOT OK
Comparing 20210322.180000.out_pnt.points .........NOT OK Comparing 20130401.060000.out_pnt.points .........NOT OK
*builds old cap ?
Automated RT Failure Notification |
* fix rt.conf; this test is only run for weekly on jet
@DeniseWorthen Can you please make this simple change for CI? This does not affect any RT results.
|
RUN | cpld_2threads_p8 | - wcoss_cray wcoss2.intel | | | ||
RUN | cpld_decomp_p8 | - wcoss_cray wcoss2.intel jet.intel | | | ||
RUN | cpld_mpi_p8 | - wcoss_cray wcoss2.intel | | | ||
#RUN | cpld_multigrid_p8 | - wcoss_cray wcoss2.intel | | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this test for ww3 multigrid?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this runs the wave model in multi (but with a single grid). It should reproduce the shel run. But there is an issue which we found after Jessica created the new mod_def files with the flag flck=true (which it should be). We found that the shel and multi cases diverge at the third timestep (#1131 (comment)) so until the issue can be resolved, I've turned off this test.
@JessicaMeixner-NOAA @BinLiu-NOAA @MinsukJi-NOAA All the RT passed, would you please review the PR? Thanks |
@DeniseWorthen are you ready for the WW3 PR to be merged? |
@JessicaMeixner-NOAA I believe so. It should be up-to-date with the dev/ufs-weather-model branch. Let me know if you see any issues. |
@DeniseWorthen the WW3 PR has been merged. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hash's look good.
PR Checklist
This PR is up-to-date with the top of all sub-component repositories except for those sub-components which are the subject of this PR. Please consult the ufs-weather-model wiki if you are unsure how to do this.
This PR has been tested using a branch which is up-to-date with the top of all sub-component repositories except for those sub-components which are the subject of this PR
An Issue describing the work contained in this PR has been created either in the subcomponent(s) or in the ufs-weather-model. The Issue should be created in the repository that is most relevant to the changes in contained in the PR. The Issue and the dependent sub-component PR
are specified below.
Results for one or more of the regression tests change and the reasons for the changes are understood and explained below.
New or updated input data is required by this PR. If checked, please work with the code managers to update input data sets on all platforms.
Instructions: All subsequent sections of text should be filled in as appropriate.
The information provided below allows the code managers to understand the changes relevant to this PR, whether those changes are in the ufs-weather-model repository or in a subcomponent repository. Ufs-weather-model code managers will use the information provided to add any applicable labels, assign reviewers and place it in the Commit Queue. Once the PR is in the Commit Queue, it is the PR owner's responsiblity to keep the PR up-to-date with the develop branch of ufs-weather-model.
Description
Implement a new mesh-based NUOPC cap for the S2SW and HAFSW applications which is restart reproducible and which can be run in debug mode. The new mesh-based cap allows the WW3 component the ability to run as shel or multigrid via configuration namelist. Currently only a single grid is supported when run as multigrid.
The
default_vars
have been updated as follows:The new WW3 cap utilizes a
ww3_shel.inp.IN
file in the parm directory. Defaults for both S2SWA and HAFSW are:ww3_shel.inp.IN
fileAdditional changes to tests include
The cpld c384 tests (
control
,restart
) are dropped and replaced by a the a new restart test for thecpld_bmark_p8
test.The
cpld_bmark_p7
andcpld_control_p7_rrtmgp
are dropped since they rely on WW3 using connectors for the global model.For each platform, the following tasking sets are removed:
cpl_c96
,cpl_c384
,cpl_bmrk_aero
,bmrk_mpi
. Thecpl_c192
has waves tasks added in each case.Only two nems.configure options for the global coupled model are retained; the
noaero
version is used only by the GNU cpld test. See issue Segfaults when running cpld aerosol model with GNU 9 and 10 #1115Issue(s) addressed
Testing
All baselines for
app=NG-GODAS
using the 1deg MOM6 grid will change because of the closure at j=1.All baselines for
app=S2SWA
andapp=HAFSW
will change. For the S2SWA app, this is because of the switch to the CMEPS mediator as well as the grid change (eg from a regular 30m grid to the MOM6 tripole grid).For the HAFSW app, the baseline will change because of the switch from the existing WW3 cap based on a grid to the mesh based cap. The mesh file provided to the HAFSW application has slightly different (O~10-6) lat/lon values than the grid produced in the existing cap. For example, the latitude difference between the existing cap and the mesh cap through the middle of the domain is shown here:
Fields exported by Wave model are shown in the following google slides
See issue #739 and issue #993 for additional figures.
This PR branch was tested using a staged input-data directory on hera at cb1d019. All tests passed except for the expected failures (all cpld, all datm tests at 1deg, hafs tests with waves). Tests were repeated after the RRTMGP and HAFS moving nest PRs were merged and confirmed that only the expected tests failed.
Updated testing
Testing at 0cf22ee after updating (but not pushing) the WW3 mesh cap branch with the changes in PR #1228 gave the following results:
cheyenne.intel : All jobs run to completion. Baselines fail only for the expected cases (cpld and hafs tests using waves). Tests no longer fail for the DATM cases, since the j=1 fix has been merged (PR #909).
cheyenne.gnu: All jobs run to completion. Baselines fail only for the cpld_control_noaero_p8 and cpld_debug_noaero_p8 tests, which now contain the wave component.
Dependencies
Requires:
WW3_input_data_20220418
has been added to all platforms ininput-data-20220414
.