Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix and optimization of prognostic closure in cumulus convection #1421

Closed

Conversation

lisa-bengtsson
Copy link
Contributor

@lisa-bengtsson lisa-bengtsson commented Sep 14, 2022

PR Checklist

  • This PR is up-to-date with the top of all sub-component repositories except for those sub-components which are the subject of this PR. Please consult the ufs-weather-model wiki if you are unsure how to do this.

  • This PR has been tested using a branch which is up-to-date with the top of all sub-component repositories except for those sub-components which are the subject of this PR

  • An Issue describing the work contained in this PR has been created either in the subcomponent(s) or in the ufs-weather-model. The Issue should be created in the repository that is most relevant to the changes in contained in the PR. The Issue and the dependent sub-component PR
    are specified below.

  • Results for one or more of the regression tests change and the reasons for the changes are understood and explained below.

  • New or updated input data is required by this PR. If checked, please work with the code managers to update input data sets on all platforms.

Instructions: All subsequent sections of text should be filled in as appropriate.

Description

This PR corrects a bug when using the prognostic closure (progsigma = true) to compute the q-tendency due to microphysics even if the diagnostic flags are false. It also optimizes the cloudbase massflux value for shallow and deep convection to work with the overall P8 physics suite.

New baselines are needed for the test: control_c384_progsigma

This update does not change the results in the control tests.

Issue(s) addressed

It addresses the issue: NCAR/ccpp-physics#960

Testing

Tested on Hera.
New baselines are needed for the test: control_c384_progsigma
This update does not change the results in the control tests.

  • hera.intel
  • hera.gnu
  • orion.intel
  • cheyenne.intel
  • cheyenne.gnu
  • gaea.intel
  • jet.intel
  • wcoss2.intel
  • acorn.intel
  • opnReqTest for newly added/changed feature
  • CI

Dependencies

NCAR/ccpp-physics#967
NOAA-EMC/fv3atm#582

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant