Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add option to ignore urls for auto waiting #575

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jan 15, 2024

Conversation

sebbi08
Copy link
Collaborator

@sebbi08 sebbi08 commented Jan 10, 2024

Add the option to skip the XHRWaiter an the fetchWaiter based on an regex in the wdi5 config.

@sebbi08
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sebbi08 commented Jan 11, 2024

Could you hint me where in the Docs this should be documented ?

Copy link
Collaborator

@Siolto Siolto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Type definition for new optional wdi5 property is missing here

Documentation should be added somewhere here I guess.

client-side-js/injectXHRPatch.cjs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@vobu vobu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

main thing is my naming suggestion (don't hate me, please)

* Regex for XHR/Fetch requests to be ignored by the auto waiter
* Ideal for long polling as this would result in the waiter waiting forever
*/
autoWaitUrlIgnoreRegex?: string[]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

don't hate me, please, but I suggest to keep config options as short as possible - would it be possible to drop the "Regex" and just make it ignoreAutoWaitUrls?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

haha no hate here :D my naming skills are way to verbal. I am fine with that.

@@ -135,6 +136,7 @@ export async function injectUI5(config: wdi5Config, browserInstance) {
const version = await (browserInstance as WebdriverIO.Browser).getUI5Version()
await checkUI5Version(version)
await clientSide_injectTools(browserInstance) // helpers for wdi5 browser scope
await clientSide_injectXHRPatch(config, browserInstance)
Copy link
Contributor

@vobu vobu Jan 12, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would it be possible to do a await Promise.all([clientSide_injectTools(browserInstance), clientSide_injectXHRPatch(config, browserInstance)]) in order to have those run in parallel and to squeeze out some performance?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hi sadly not the clientSide_injectTools function add the compare version function to the browser and that is needed in clientSide_injectXHRPatch and checkUI5Version is actualy not async.

return await browserInstance.executeAsync((config, done) => {
const originalFetch = window.fetch

const autoWaitUrlIgnoreRegex = config.wdi5.autoWaitUrlIgnoreRegex
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

see my other comment with the renaming suggestion

@@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ exports.config = {
logLevel: "verbose", // [optional] error | verbose | silent, default: "error"
skipInjectUI5OnStart: false, // [optional] {boolean}, default: false; true when UI5 is not on the start page, you need to later call <wdioUI5service>.injectUI5() manually
waitForUI5Timeout: 15000, // [optional] {number}, default: 15000; maximum waiting time in milliseconds while checking for UI5 availability
btpWorkZoneEnablement: false // [optional] {boolean}, default: false; whether to instruct wdi5 to inject itself in both the SAP Build Workzone, standard edition, shell and app
btpWorkZoneEnablement: false, // [optional] {boolean}, default: false; whether to instruct wdi5 to inject itself in both the SAP Build Workzone, standard edition, shell and app
autoWaitUrlIgnoreRegex: [] // [optional] {string[]}, default: []; Array of regex to ignore certain XHR/Fetch calls wile autowaiting
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

see my other comment about renaming this setting, please

docs/configuration.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/configuration.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -133,6 +134,12 @@ Number in milliseconds (default: `15000`) to wait for UI5-related operations wit
Boolean setting to trigger injecting `wdi5` into both the shell and the app when used with the SAP Build Workzone, standard edition.
Recommended complement is to also [configure IAS Authentication](authentication?id=sap-cloud-identity-services-identity-authentication): as SAP Build requires its own Identity Provider (most likely provided by using an IAS tenant), you'll have to configure authentication against that as well in `wdi5`.

### `autoWaitUrlIgnoreRegex`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

see my rename comment

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
const femiddleware = require("@sap-ux/ui5-middleware-fe-mockserver")

module.exports = async function middleware(middlewareConfig) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is so cool. well well done!!!

@@ -10,3 +10,19 @@ server:
configuration:
baseUri: "https://services.odata.org/V2"
strictSSL: false
- name: delayed-mockserver
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

again: cool idea, well done 😀

})
}
startXHR()
const startFetch = () => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i keep my fingers crossed that the gh runners are equipped with enough memory for the CI runs 😁

Co-authored-by: Volker Buzek <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Volker Buzek <[email protected]>
@vobu vobu merged commit 4f1255c into main Jan 15, 2024
13 checks passed
@vobu vobu deleted the feature/add-xhr-fetch-ignore branch January 15, 2024 09:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants