AutoShape integer image-size fix #10090
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We have a division at line 694, and then a multiplication at line 695, so it makes
y*g
not an integer. And sinceshape1
will be used at line 697 to ensure the size is divisible by thestride
, this may lead to different image size.In my experiment, my image is [640, 640], it's divisible by the default stride 32, but I found that the result is changed to [672, 672] after line 697. So the final detection result is slightly different from that directly using the
detect.py
script, which does not call the AutoShape methods.Signed-off-by: janus-zheng [email protected]
🛠️ PR Summary
Made with ❤️ by Ultralytics Actions
🌟 Summary
Adjustment of image shape calculation for more reliable resizing in YOLOv5.
📊 Key Changes
🎯 Purpose & Impact