-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 386
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
anonymous users #279
Comments
We also need frontend change for this. From API's point of view, this is just an additional provider It will be nice to do local verification with the same simple rules server side enforces on anonymous:
|
add anon option and direct provider #279
Can anonymous users vote? If can, do we need protection on the voting results? |
good point. I'll make a change to prevent anonymous from voting |
If anonymous users are enabled is there anything to prevent a bot from entering a username and posting spam? Is there a honeypot field and/or recaptcha for example? |
sure, some protection will be nice to have. I don't think recaptcha will be friendly for honest users, but honeypot field should be ok. I also have a plan of integrating some kind of anti-spam on server-side. But even without all of this - enabling anonymous access will be user's decision and will be off by default. And I can imagine some internal/trusted systems, where users would like to allow such access without worrying about spam/abuse. |
Should anonymously logged in user be able to request data removal? Edit: Nevermind, I see server rejects such requests |
This is going to be an optional mode (off by default) implementing auth provider allowing login without any verification. The only input it will ask is a user name.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: