Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[UNDERTOW-2319] Move io.undertow.multipart.minsize property to UndertowOptions #1533

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

xjusko
Copy link
Contributor

@xjusko xjusko commented Nov 6, 2023

@xjusko
Copy link
Contributor Author

xjusko commented Mar 14, 2024

Hi @fl4via , could you please review my PR? Thanks.

@baranowb baranowb requested review from fl4via and ropalka April 3, 2024 08:28
@baranowb baranowb added enhancement Enhances existing behaviour or code new feature/API change New feature to be introduced or a change to the API (non suitable to minor releases) waiting peer review PRs that edit core classes might require an extra review labels Apr 3, 2024
@baranowb
Copy link
Contributor

baranowb commented Apr 3, 2024

This will require upstream RFE -> @xjusko

@xjusko
Copy link
Contributor Author

xjusko commented Apr 5, 2024

This will require upstream RFE -> @xjusko

@baranowb Can I ask which upstream repo you have in mind?

@ropalka
Copy link
Contributor

ropalka commented Aug 7, 2024

Does this kind of change requires an RFE @fl4via ?

@baranowb
Copy link
Contributor

baranowb commented Sep 4, 2024

I think I did reply to this question offline - but it will require RFE in WFLY, wont it?
@xjusko ^^

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Enhances existing behaviour or code new feature/API change New feature to be introduced or a change to the API (non suitable to minor releases) waiting peer review PRs that edit core classes might require an extra review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants