We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
See usnistgov/metaschema#112
This is both to improve the (JSON) schemas in general, and make them more robust across conformant processors.
Anyone depending on validation in JSON Schema or who wishes to use the published schemas as bases for extension etc.
Usability and extensibility of the generated schemas.
Always (any time a JSON Schema is produced from a metaschema).
Inspect the schemas.
The ideal syntax would both disambiguate all the definitions, and be legible for devs and robust.
We may wish to keyword both top-level module, and interim module, into a definition name, in order to help.
Run this by the community we have participants who can help review the work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
wendellpiez
david-waltermire
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Describe the bug
See usnistgov/metaschema#112
This is both to improve the (JSON) schemas in general, and make them more robust across conformant processors.
Who is the bug affecting?
Anyone depending on validation in JSON Schema or who wishes to use the published schemas as bases for extension etc.
What is affected by this bug?
Usability and extensibility of the generated schemas.
When does this occur?
Always (any time a JSON Schema is produced from a metaschema).
How do we replicate the issue?
Inspect the schemas.
Expected behavior (i.e. solution)
The ideal syntax would both disambiguate all the definitions, and be legible for devs and robust.
We may wish to keyword both top-level module, and interim module, into a definition name, in order to help.
Other Comments
Run this by the community we have participants who can help review the work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: