Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Filling gaps in XSLT-M4 Metaschema support #118

Merged

Conversation

wendellpiez
Copy link
Collaborator

@wendellpiez wendellpiez commented Feb 22, 2021

Committer Notes

This PR is planned to address at least:

Potentially also addressing documentation issues.

Note: these are breaking changes for the OSCAL metaschemas, which will have to updated to reflect changes in the metaschema model. (Suggest reviewing for ANY usage at the same time, with placement of root-name.)

All Submissions:

  • Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
  • Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?
  • Have you squashed any non-relevant commits and commit messages? [instructions]
  • Do all automated CI/CD checks pass?

Changes to Core Features:

  • Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
  • Have you written new tests for your core changes, as applicable?
  • Have you included examples of how to use your new feature(s)?
  • Have you updated all website](https://pages.nist.gov/metaschema) and readme documentation affected by the changes you made? Changes to the website can be made in the website/content directory of your branch.

@wendellpiez
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@david-waltermire-nist this is ready to test. (I will also continue to test locally.) But do we want to pull into an integration branch?

@wendellpiez wendellpiez marked this pull request as ready for review February 22, 2021 21:23
…older XSPec (not operative) for metaschema reduction in composition (removing of unused definitions)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants