Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add isBase58 functionality #1445

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2020
Merged

Conversation

ezkemboi
Copy link
Member

@ezkemboi ezkemboi commented Sep 20, 2020

feat(isBase58): add isBase58 functionality

Add functionality of isBase58 based on a recommendation from @genus1 as stated in #1421.

Checklist

  • PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  • README updated (where applicable)
  • Tests written (where applicable)

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 20, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1445 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master     #1445   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           95        96    +1     
  Lines         1256      1263    +7     
=========================================
+ Hits          1256      1263    +7     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/index.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/lib/isBase58.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d6fff37...dafc026. Read the comment docs.

@profnandaa profnandaa changed the title add isBas58 functionality add isBase58 functionality Sep 20, 2020
Copy link
Member

@profnandaa profnandaa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGMT, thanks!

@profnandaa
Copy link
Member

@tux-tn -- can have a look at this?

@rubiin
Copy link
Member

rubiin commented Sep 28, 2020

@profnandaa this looks good and I have tested this

Copy link
Member

@tux-tn tux-tn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉

@profnandaa
Copy link
Member

Thanks @rubiin @tux-tn 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants