-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix next/image noscript src path with loaders #24011
Conversation
In the noscript img version the correct `src` and `sizes` attributes are overwritten by not necessary inline declaration; in particular using the loaders the `src` attribute not take the right absolute path. I found this issue using a custom loader and because my site didn't indexing any images on the Google image search.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is missing an integration test and a fixes
marker, there's a related issue to this change right?
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I fixed the formatting issue, thanks. I think that this is one of the next priority issue because the final rendered source code it's wrong and it could be why the images are not correctly crawled. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This is linked to this issue #24277 |
We can't merge PRs (especially bugfixes) without tests. As said integration tests should be added for this change to prevent regressions in the future 👍 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
👋 reminder that this can't be merged without tests, can you please add them 🙏 |
Hi @timneutkens ... could you please give me some suggestion to how add them: I never added tests before and I don't know if I must create a new test file or improve an existing one, thanks! |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
You can check |
Ok thanks... I'm new in the testing world and I can't understand how to run a single test... for testing purpose :P |
No worries! It's explained in the contributing doc: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#to-run-tests |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@timneutkens I added some tests few days ago... Are they ok? Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good now! Thanks!
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Failing test suitesCommit: 6ec8796 test/integration/basic/test/index.test.js
Expand output● Basic Features › should polyfill Node.js modules
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Stats from current PRDefault Server Mode (Decrease detected ✓)General Overall decrease ✓
Page Load Tests Overall decrease
|
vercel/next.js canary | valse/next.js patch-2 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
/ failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
/ total time (seconds) | 1.902 | 2.057 | |
/ avg req/sec | 1314.31 | 1215.58 | |
/error-in-render failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
/error-in-render total time (seconds) | 1.094 | 1.132 | |
/error-in-render avg req/sec | 2285.66 | 2207.98 |
Client Bundles (main, webpack, commons)
vercel/next.js canary | valse/next.js patch-2 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
framework-HASH.js gzip | 42 kB | 42 kB | ✓ |
main-HASH.js gzip | 20.2 kB | 20.2 kB | ✓ |
webpack-HASH.js gzip | 804 B | 804 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 63 kB | 63 kB | ✓ |
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary | valse/next.js patch-2 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
polyfills-HASH.js gzip | 31.1 kB | 31.1 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 31.1 kB | 31.1 kB | ✓ |
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary | valse/next.js patch-2 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_app-HASH.js gzip | 801 B | 801 B | ✓ |
_error-HASH.js gzip | 3.17 kB | 3.17 kB | ✓ |
amp-HASH.js gzip | 527 B | 527 B | ✓ |
css-HASH.js gzip | 329 B | 329 B | ✓ |
hooks-HASH.js gzip | 903 B | 903 B | ✓ |
index-HASH.js gzip | 263 B | 263 B | ✓ |
link-HASH.js gzip | 1.65 kB | 1.65 kB | ✓ |
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip | 322 B | 322 B | ✓ |
withRouter-HASH.js gzip | 320 B | 320 B | ✓ |
bb14e60e810b..30f.css gzip | 125 B | 125 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 8.41 kB | 8.41 kB | ✓ |
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary | valse/next.js patch-2 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_buildManifest.js gzip | 391 B | 391 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 391 B | 391 B | ✓ |
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary | valse/next.js patch-2 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
index.html gzip | 523 B | 523 B | ✓ |
link.html gzip | 536 B | 536 B | ✓ |
withRouter.html gzip | 516 B | 516 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 1.57 kB | 1.57 kB | ✓ |
Serverless Mode (Decrease detected ✓)
General Overall decrease ✓
vercel/next.js canary | valse/next.js patch-2 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
buildDuration | 12.4s | 11.9s | -424ms |
buildDurationCached | 3.4s | 3.6s | |
nodeModulesSize | 46.4 MB | 46.4 MB | -113 B |
Client Bundles (main, webpack, commons)
vercel/next.js canary | valse/next.js patch-2 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
framework-HASH.js gzip | 42 kB | 42 kB | ✓ |
main-HASH.js gzip | 20.2 kB | 20.2 kB | ✓ |
webpack-HASH.js gzip | 804 B | 804 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 63 kB | 63 kB | ✓ |
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary | valse/next.js patch-2 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
polyfills-HASH.js gzip | 31.1 kB | 31.1 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 31.1 kB | 31.1 kB | ✓ |
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary | valse/next.js patch-2 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_app-HASH.js gzip | 801 B | 801 B | ✓ |
_error-HASH.js gzip | 3.17 kB | 3.17 kB | ✓ |
amp-HASH.js gzip | 527 B | 527 B | ✓ |
css-HASH.js gzip | 329 B | 329 B | ✓ |
hooks-HASH.js gzip | 903 B | 903 B | ✓ |
index-HASH.js gzip | 263 B | 263 B | ✓ |
link-HASH.js gzip | 1.65 kB | 1.65 kB | ✓ |
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip | 322 B | 322 B | ✓ |
withRouter-HASH.js gzip | 320 B | 320 B | ✓ |
bb14e60e810b..30f.css gzip | 125 B | 125 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 8.41 kB | 8.41 kB | ✓ |
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary | valse/next.js patch-2 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_buildManifest.js gzip | 391 B | 391 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 391 B | 391 B | ✓ |
Serverless bundles
vercel/next.js canary | valse/next.js patch-2 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_error.js | 16.9 kB | 16.9 kB | ✓ |
404.html | 1.98 kB | 1.98 kB | ✓ |
500.html | 1.96 kB | 1.96 kB | ✓ |
amp.amp.html | 10.8 kB | 10.8 kB | ✓ |
amp.html | 1.17 kB | 1.17 kB | ✓ |
css.html | 1.35 kB | 1.35 kB | ✓ |
hooks.html | 1.23 kB | 1.23 kB | ✓ |
index.js | 17.2 kB | 17.2 kB | ✓ |
link.js | 17.5 kB | 17.5 kB | ✓ |
routerDirect.js | 17.3 kB | 17.3 kB | ✓ |
withRouter.js | 17.3 kB | 17.3 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 105 kB | 105 kB | ✓ |
Webpack 4 Mode (Decrease detected ✓)
General Overall decrease ✓
vercel/next.js canary | valse/next.js patch-2 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
buildDuration | 9.5s | 9.5s | |
buildDurationCached | 3.8s | 3.9s | |
nodeModulesSize | 46.4 MB | 46.4 MB | -113 B |
Page Load Tests Overall decrease ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary | valse/next.js patch-2 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
/ failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
/ total time (seconds) | 1.902 | 1.943 | |
/ avg req/sec | 1314.28 | 1286.63 | |
/error-in-render failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
/error-in-render total time (seconds) | 1.075 | 1.172 | |
/error-in-render avg req/sec | 2325.03 | 2133.78 |
Client Bundles (main, webpack, commons)
vercel/next.js canary | valse/next.js patch-2 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
677f882d2ed8..HASH.js gzip | 13.3 kB | 13.3 kB | ✓ |
framework.HASH.js gzip | 41.8 kB | 41.8 kB | ✓ |
main-HASH.js gzip | 7.99 kB | 7.99 kB | ✓ |
webpack-HASH.js gzip | 751 B | 751 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 63.8 kB | 63.8 kB | ✓ |
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary | valse/next.js patch-2 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
polyfills-HASH.js gzip | 31.3 kB | 31.3 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 31.3 kB | 31.3 kB | ✓ |
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary | valse/next.js patch-2 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_app-HASH.js gzip | 1.07 kB | 1.07 kB | ✓ |
_error-HASH.js gzip | 3.84 kB | 3.84 kB | ✓ |
amp-HASH.js gzip | 536 B | 536 B | ✓ |
css-HASH.js gzip | 333 B | 333 B | ✓ |
hooks-HASH.js gzip | 910 B | 910 B | ✓ |
index-HASH.js gzip | 227 B | 227 B | ✓ |
link-HASH.js gzip | 1.64 kB | 1.64 kB | ✓ |
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip | 295 B | 295 B | ✓ |
withRouter-HASH.js gzip | 292 B | 292 B | ✓ |
e025d2764813..52f.css gzip | 125 B | 125 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 9.28 kB | 9.28 kB | ✓ |
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary | valse/next.js patch-2 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_buildManifest.js gzip | 420 B | 420 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 420 B | 420 B | ✓ |
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary | valse/next.js patch-2 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
index.html gzip | 568 B | 568 B | ✓ |
link.html gzip | 579 B | 579 B | ✓ |
withRouter.html gzip | 561 B | 561 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 1.71 kB | 1.71 kB | ✓ |
In the `noscript` img version the correct `src` and `sizes` attributes are overwritten by not necessary inline declaration; in particular using the loaders the `src` attribute not take the right absolute path. I found this issue using a custom loader and because my site didn't indexing any images on the Google image search. Fixes vercel#24277
In the
noscript
img version the correctsrc
andsizes
attributes are overwritten by not necessary inline declaration; in particular using the loaders thesrc
attribute not take the right absolute path. I found this issue using a custom loader and because my site didn't indexing any images on the Google image search.Fixes #24277