Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: support --cache-strategy ESLint argument (fixes #29926) #29928

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Nov 8, 2021

Conversation

OKinane
Copy link
Contributor

@OKinane OKinane commented Oct 14, 2021

Fixes #29926

Bug

  • Related issues linked using fixes #number
  • Integration tests added
  • Errors have helpful link attached, see contributing.md

@OKinane
Copy link
Contributor Author

OKinane commented Oct 15, 2021

fixes #29926

Copy link
Collaborator

@housseindjirdeh housseindjirdeh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this! Would it be possible to add an integration test for this flag similar to how we added one for --cache-location?

@OKinane
Copy link
Contributor Author

OKinane commented Oct 19, 2021

Thanks for this! Would it be possible to add an integration test for this flag similar to how we added one for --cache-location?

It's stated in the tests's readme that no new test should be add in the integration folder. Should I still add one ?

@styfle
Copy link
Member

styfle commented Oct 23, 2021

Take a look at this test for an example

test('the --cache-location flag allows the user to define a separate cache location', async () => {
const cacheFile = join(dirEslintCache, '.eslintcache')
await fs.remove(cacheFile)
await nextLint(dirEslintCache, ['--cache-location', cacheFile])
expect(fs.existsSync(cacheFile)).toBe(true)
})

@OKinane
Copy link
Contributor Author

OKinane commented Oct 26, 2021

@housseindjirdeh @styfle I've add two integration tests, which btw helped me find a bug in my first implementation 😃

@ijjk

This comment has been minimized.

@ijjk

This comment has been minimized.

@ijjk

This comment has been minimized.

@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Nov 2, 2021

Failing test suites

Commit: c951513

test/integration/preload-viewport/test/index.test.js

  • Prefetching Links in viewport > should not prefetch already loaded scripts
Expand output

● Prefetching Links in viewport › should not prefetch already loaded scripts

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: false
Received: true

  397 |     expect(hrefs).toEqual([...new Set(hrefs)])
  398 |
> 399 |     // Verify encoding
      |     ^
  400 |     expect(hrefs.some((e) => e.includes(`%5Bhello%5D-`))).toBe(true)
  401 |   })
  402 |

  at Object.<anonymous> (integration/preload-viewport/test/index.test.js:399:5)

@OKinane
Copy link
Contributor Author

OKinane commented Nov 4, 2021

All failed tests seem unrelated to my changes. Do you confirm @styfle @housseindjirdeh ?

@ijjk

This comment has been minimized.

@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Nov 6, 2021

Stats from current PR

Default Build (Decrease detected ✓)
General Overall increase ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary OKinane/next.js support_cacheStrategy_eslint_arg Change
buildDuration 17.6s 17.7s ⚠️ +86ms
buildDurationCached 3.5s 3.6s ⚠️ +35ms
nodeModulesSize 332 MB 332 MB ⚠️ +340 B
Page Load Tests Overall decrease ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary OKinane/next.js support_cacheStrategy_eslint_arg Change
/ failed reqs 0 0
/ total time (seconds) 2.888 2.857 -0.03
/ avg req/sec 865.58 875.17 +9.59
/error-in-render failed reqs 0 0
/error-in-render total time (seconds) 1.352 1.391 ⚠️ +0.04
/error-in-render avg req/sec 1849.11 1796.95 ⚠️ -52.16
Client Bundles (main, webpack, commons)
vercel/next.js canary OKinane/next.js support_cacheStrategy_eslint_arg Change
450.HASH.js gzip 179 B 179 B
framework-HASH.js gzip 42.2 kB 42.2 kB
main-HASH.js gzip 28 kB 28 kB
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.45 kB 1.45 kB
Overall change 71.9 kB 71.9 kB
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary OKinane/next.js support_cacheStrategy_eslint_arg Change
polyfills-HASH.js gzip 31 kB 31 kB
Overall change 31 kB 31 kB
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary OKinane/next.js support_cacheStrategy_eslint_arg Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 1.23 kB 1.23 kB
_error-HASH.js gzip 194 B 194 B
amp-HASH.js gzip 312 B 312 B
css-HASH.js gzip 327 B 327 B
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 2.38 kB 2.38 kB
head-HASH.js gzip 350 B 350 B
hooks-HASH.js gzip 635 B 635 B
image-HASH.js gzip 4.44 kB 4.44 kB
index-HASH.js gzip 263 B 263 B
link-HASH.js gzip 1.87 kB 1.87 kB
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 321 B 321 B
script-HASH.js gzip 383 B 383 B
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 318 B 318 B
334f979574ae..6f4.css gzip 106 B 106 B
Overall change 13.1 kB 13.1 kB
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary OKinane/next.js support_cacheStrategy_eslint_arg Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 459 B 459 B
Overall change 459 B 459 B
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary OKinane/next.js support_cacheStrategy_eslint_arg Change
index.html gzip 522 B 522 B
link.html gzip 535 B 535 B
withRouter.html gzip 515 B 515 B
Overall change 1.57 kB 1.57 kB

Default Build with SWC (Increase detected ⚠️)
General Overall increase ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary OKinane/next.js support_cacheStrategy_eslint_arg Change
buildDuration 19s 20.7s ⚠️ +1.7s
buildDurationCached 3.6s 3.6s ⚠️ +36ms
nodeModulesSize 332 MB 332 MB ⚠️ +340 B
Page Load Tests Overall increase ✓
vercel/next.js canary OKinane/next.js support_cacheStrategy_eslint_arg Change
/ failed reqs 0 0
/ total time (seconds) 2.893 2.855 -0.04
/ avg req/sec 864.22 875.77 +11.55
/error-in-render failed reqs 0 0
/error-in-render total time (seconds) 1.406 1.352 -0.05
/error-in-render avg req/sec 1777.69 1849.56 +71.87
Client Bundles (main, webpack, commons)
vercel/next.js canary OKinane/next.js support_cacheStrategy_eslint_arg Change
450.HASH.js gzip 179 B 179 B
framework-HASH.js gzip 42.3 kB 42.3 kB
main-HASH.js gzip 28.2 kB 28.2 kB
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.43 kB 1.43 kB
Overall change 72.1 kB 72.1 kB
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary OKinane/next.js support_cacheStrategy_eslint_arg Change
polyfills-HASH.js gzip 31 kB 31 kB
Overall change 31 kB 31 kB
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary OKinane/next.js support_cacheStrategy_eslint_arg Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 1.22 kB 1.22 kB
_error-HASH.js gzip 180 B 180 B
amp-HASH.js gzip 305 B 305 B
css-HASH.js gzip 321 B 321 B
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 2.38 kB 2.38 kB
head-HASH.js gzip 342 B 342 B
hooks-HASH.js gzip 622 B 622 B
image-HASH.js gzip 4.46 kB 4.46 kB
index-HASH.js gzip 256 B 256 B
link-HASH.js gzip 1.91 kB 1.91 kB
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 314 B 314 B
script-HASH.js gzip 375 B 375 B
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 309 B 309 B
334f979574ae..6f4.css gzip 106 B 106 B
Overall change 13.1 kB 13.1 kB
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary OKinane/next.js support_cacheStrategy_eslint_arg Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 460 B 460 B
Overall change 460 B 460 B
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary OKinane/next.js support_cacheStrategy_eslint_arg Change
index.html gzip 521 B 521 B
link.html gzip 534 B 534 B
withRouter.html gzip 515 B 515 B
Overall change 1.57 kB 1.57 kB
Commit: 12baf74

@styfle styfle merged commit 39ef77c into vercel:canary Nov 8, 2021
@vercel vercel locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 27, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Eslint's --cache-strategy argument is not supported
4 participants