-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix running server with Polyfilled fetch #31935
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
javivelasco
requested review from
huozhi,
ijjk,
shuding and
timneutkens
as code owners
November 29, 2021 17:43
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
javivelasco
force-pushed
the
fix-30398
branch
from
December 2, 2021 07:47
f8983ee
to
dca207f
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
javivelasco
force-pushed
the
fix-30398
branch
from
December 2, 2021 12:43
dca207f
to
90dc5ae
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
javivelasco
force-pushed
the
fix-30398
branch
from
December 2, 2021 18:24
90dc5ae
to
5a4b78c
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
ijjk
reviewed
Dec 2, 2021
Failing test suitesCommit: ec74432 test/production/middleware-typescript/test/index.test.ts
Expand output● should set-up next › should have built and started
● Test suite failed to run
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
javivelasco
force-pushed
the
fix-30398
branch
from
December 3, 2021 12:22
ec74432
to
073122a
Compare
javivelasco
force-pushed
the
fix-30398
branch
from
December 3, 2021 12:24
073122a
to
d027c2b
Compare
Stats from current PRDefault Build (Increase detected
|
vercel/next.js canary | javivelasco/next.js fix-30398 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
buildDuration | 23.8s | 23.2s | -603ms |
buildDurationCached | 4.2s | 4.2s | -23ms |
nodeModulesSize | 347 MB | 347 MB |
Page Load Tests Overall increase ✓
vercel/next.js canary | javivelasco/next.js fix-30398 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
/ failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
/ total time (seconds) | 3.965 | 3.999 | |
/ avg req/sec | 630.55 | 625.21 | |
/error-in-render failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
/error-in-render total time (seconds) | 2.057 | 2.004 | -0.05 |
/error-in-render avg req/sec | 1215.64 | 1247.6 | +31.96 |
Client Bundles (main, webpack, commons)
vercel/next.js canary | javivelasco/next.js fix-30398 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
450.HASH.js gzip | 179 B | 179 B | ✓ |
framework-HASH.js gzip | 42.2 kB | 42.2 kB | ✓ |
main-HASH.js gzip | 28.4 kB | 28.4 kB | ✓ |
webpack-HASH.js gzip | 1.45 kB | 1.45 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 72.3 kB | 72.3 kB | ✓ |
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary | javivelasco/next.js fix-30398 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
polyfills-HASH.js gzip | 31 kB | 31 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 31 kB | 31 kB | ✓ |
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary | javivelasco/next.js fix-30398 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_app-HASH.js gzip | 1.37 kB | 1.37 kB | ✓ |
_error-HASH.js gzip | 194 B | 194 B | ✓ |
amp-HASH.js gzip | 312 B | 312 B | ✓ |
css-HASH.js gzip | 326 B | 326 B | ✓ |
dynamic-HASH.js gzip | 2.38 kB | 2.38 kB | ✓ |
head-HASH.js gzip | 350 B | 350 B | ✓ |
hooks-HASH.js gzip | 635 B | 635 B | ✓ |
image-HASH.js gzip | 4.49 kB | 4.49 kB | ✓ |
index-HASH.js gzip | 263 B | 263 B | ✓ |
link-HASH.js gzip | 1.87 kB | 1.87 kB | ✓ |
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip | 321 B | 321 B | ✓ |
script-HASH.js gzip | 383 B | 383 B | ✓ |
withRouter-HASH.js gzip | 318 B | 318 B | ✓ |
85e02e95b279..7e3.css gzip | 107 B | 107 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 13.3 kB | 13.3 kB | ✓ |
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary | javivelasco/next.js fix-30398 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_buildManifest.js gzip | 460 B | 460 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 460 B | 460 B | ✓ |
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary | javivelasco/next.js fix-30398 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
index.html gzip | 532 B | 532 B | ✓ |
link.html gzip | 545 B | 545 B | ✓ |
withRouter.html gzip | 526 B | 526 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 1.6 kB | 1.6 kB | ✓ |
Default Build with SWC (Decrease detected ✓)
General Overall increase ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary | javivelasco/next.js fix-30398 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
buildDuration | 26.5s | 26.3s | -161ms |
buildDurationCached | 4.3s | 4.2s | -137ms |
nodeModulesSize | 347 MB | 347 MB |
Page Load Tests Overall decrease ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary | javivelasco/next.js fix-30398 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
/ failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
/ total time (seconds) | 3.876 | 3.977 | |
/ avg req/sec | 645.02 | 628.62 | |
/error-in-render failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
/error-in-render total time (seconds) | 2.032 | 2.03 | 0 |
/error-in-render avg req/sec | 1230.15 | 1231.31 | +1.16 |
Client Bundles (main, webpack, commons)
vercel/next.js canary | javivelasco/next.js fix-30398 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
450.HASH.js gzip | 179 B | 179 B | ✓ |
framework-HASH.js gzip | 42.3 kB | 42.3 kB | ✓ |
main-HASH.js gzip | 28.6 kB | 28.6 kB | ✓ |
webpack-HASH.js gzip | 1.44 kB | 1.44 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 72.5 kB | 72.5 kB | ✓ |
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary | javivelasco/next.js fix-30398 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
polyfills-HASH.js gzip | 31 kB | 31 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 31 kB | 31 kB | ✓ |
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary | javivelasco/next.js fix-30398 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_app-HASH.js gzip | 1.35 kB | 1.35 kB | ✓ |
_error-HASH.js gzip | 180 B | 180 B | ✓ |
amp-HASH.js gzip | 305 B | 305 B | ✓ |
css-HASH.js gzip | 321 B | 321 B | ✓ |
dynamic-HASH.js gzip | 2.37 kB | 2.37 kB | ✓ |
head-HASH.js gzip | 342 B | 342 B | ✓ |
hooks-HASH.js gzip | 622 B | 622 B | ✓ |
image-HASH.js gzip | 4.53 kB | 4.53 kB | ✓ |
index-HASH.js gzip | 256 B | 256 B | ✓ |
link-HASH.js gzip | 1.9 kB | 1.9 kB | ✓ |
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip | 314 B | 314 B | ✓ |
script-HASH.js gzip | 375 B | 375 B | ✓ |
withRouter-HASH.js gzip | 309 B | 309 B | ✓ |
85e02e95b279..7e3.css gzip | 107 B | 107 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 13.3 kB | 13.3 kB | ✓ |
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary | javivelasco/next.js fix-30398 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_buildManifest.js gzip | 458 B | 458 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 458 B | 458 B | ✓ |
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary | javivelasco/next.js fix-30398 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
index.html gzip | 532 B | 532 B | ✓ |
link.html gzip | 545 B | 545 B | ✓ |
withRouter.html gzip | 526 B | 526 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 1.6 kB | 1.6 kB | ✓ |
ijjk
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2021
ijjk
added a commit
to ijjk/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2021
This reverts commit 1c199a5.
ijjk
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2021
3 tasks
kodiakhq bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 13, 2021
**Note**: This PR is applying again changes landed #31935 that were reverted from an investigation. This PR fixes #30398 By default Next will polyfill some fetch APIs (Request, Response, Header and fetch) only if fetch is not found in the global scope in certain entry points. If we have a custom server which is adding a global fetch (and only fetch) at the very top then the rest of APIs will not be polyfilled. This PR adds a test on the custom server where we can add a custom polyfill for fetch with an env variable. This reproduces the issue since next-server.js will be required without having a polyfill for Response which makes it fail on requiring NextResponse. Then we remove the code that checks for subrequests to happen within the **sandbox** so that we don't need to polyfill `next-server` anymore. The we also introduce an improvement on how we handle relative requests. Since #31858 introduced a `port` and `hostname` options for the server, we can always pass absolute URLs to the Middleware so we can always use the original `nextUrl` to pass it to fetch. This brings a lot of simplification for `NextURL` since we don't have to consider relative URLs no more. ## Bug - [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [x] Integration tests added - [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
cdierkens
pushed a commit
to cdierkens/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2021
**Note**: This PR is applying again changes landed vercel#31935 that were reverted from an investigation. This PR fixes vercel#30398 By default Next will polyfill some fetch APIs (Request, Response, Header and fetch) only if fetch is not found in the global scope in certain entry points. If we have a custom server which is adding a global fetch (and only fetch) at the very top then the rest of APIs will not be polyfilled. This PR adds a test on the custom server where we can add a custom polyfill for fetch with an env variable. This reproduces the issue since next-server.js will be required without having a polyfill for Response which makes it fail on requiring NextResponse. Then we remove the code that checks for subrequests to happen within the **sandbox** so that we don't need to polyfill `next-server` anymore. The we also introduce an improvement on how we handle relative requests. Since vercel#31858 introduced a `port` and `hostname` options for the server, we can always pass absolute URLs to the Middleware so we can always use the original `nextUrl` to pass it to fetch. This brings a lot of simplification for `NextURL` since we don't have to consider relative URLs no more. ## Bug - [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [x] Integration tests added - [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes #30398
By default Next will polyfill some fetch APIs (Request, Response, Header and fetch) only if fetch is not found in the global scope in certain entry points. If we have a custom server which is adding a global fetch (and only fetch) at the very top then the rest of APIs will not be polyfilled.
This PR adds a test on the custom server where we can add a custom polyfill for fetch with an env variable. This reproduces the issue since next-server.js will be required without having a polyfill for Response which makes it fail on requiring NextResponse. Then we remove the code that checks for subrequests to happen within the sandbox so that we don't need to polyfill
next-server
anymore.The we also introduce an improvement on how we handle relative requests. Since #31858 introduced a
port
andhostname
options for the server, we can always pass absolute URLs to the Middleware so we can always use the originalnextUrl
to pass it to fetch. This brings a lot of simplification forNextURL
since we don't have to consider relative URLs no more.Bug
fixes #number
contributing.md