-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added error when no config is exported from next.config.js #9921
Closed
Closed
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
184ba57
Added error when no config is exported from next.config.js
27185b8
Merge branch 'canary' into patch/fix-9919
jamesmosier 7788fdf
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/canary' into patch/fix-9919
cdeb9ef
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/canary' into patch/fix-9919
975bd05
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/canary' into patch/fix-9919
5461cd8
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/canary' into patch/fix-9919
dd11ed7
added test for empty next.config file
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we should be checking for the number of keys in the object. Shouldn't we be checking for
undefined
(or a loose== null
)?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In my testing, when I did
config
was{}
, not a falsy output.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
now that I think of it, technically this is a valid
next.config.js
file...so maybe there is another check I could do to see if the file has any exports defined 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't been able to find a way to determine if a Node file actually contains a
module.exports
definition (short of reading the file viafs.readFile
and parsing the string file contents).There is a way to get the Node
Module
object of the file (viamodule.children.find
), but the contents are still{}
😢Any thoughts? I know that
module.exports = {}
is technically a validnext.config.js
file, so checking viaObject.keys
isn't going to work under that assumption.