Minor enhancement about listener

[critical27]

What type of PR is this?

• bug
• feature
• enhancement

What problem(s) does this PR solve?

Issue(s) number:

Description:

Also a prepare work:

1. Only pass necessary parameter to Listener's constructor, other's could be passed to their inherited classes.
2. Modify the comment about Listener to keep up with latest changes.

How do you solve it?

Special notes for your reviewer, ex. impact of this fix, design document, etc:

Checklist:

Tests:

• Unit test(positive and negative cases)
• Function test
• Performance test
• N/A

Affects:

• Documentation affected (Please add the label if documentation needs to be modified.)
• Incompatibility (If it breaks the compatibility, please describe it and add the label.）
• If it's needed to cherry-pick (If cherry-pick to some branches is required, please label the destination version(s).)
• Performance impacted: Consumes more CPU/Memory

Release notes:

Please confirm whether to be reflected in release notes and how to describe:

ex. Fixed the bug .....

[panda-sheep]

Good job

[panda-sheep]

I have a small question:
Why does the function comment here exist? Can it be removed?
Only leave functions, such as the above function, only need to leave
virtual void processLogs() = 0;

Otherwise, there are two copies of these comments, which feels a bit redundant?