Virtual-branch-1935744840 #332
Conversation
Deploying flyxc with
|
| Latest commit: |
cda717f
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://7b2f5e9d.flyxc.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://virtual-branch-1935744840.flyxc.pages.dev |
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis PR includes several path and configuration updates across multiple applications. The main changes involve updating references from 'airspaces' to 'fxc-tiles', adjusting Docker configuration, and cleaning up NX configuration. No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to various configuration files and scripts across multiple applications within the project. Key modifications include adjustments to ignore patterns in ESLint, updates to Git ignore rules, changes to Dockerfile paths for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
🔇 Additional comments (5)package.json (5)
The TypeScript update from 5.6.2 to 5.6.3 is a patch version that includes bug fixes. This is a safe update.
The following UI-related packages have received minor version updates:
These updates contain bug fixes and improvements and are safe to apply. Also applies to: 102-102, 108-108, 152-152
The Workbox packages have been updated from 7.1.0 to 7.3.0. Please ensure your service worker configurations are compatible with the new version. #!/bin/bash
# Look for service worker configurations
rg -l "workbox" || echo "No Workbox configurations found"
# Check for any custom service worker implementations
fd -e js -e ts "sw\." || echo "No service worker files found"
The NX packages have been updated from 20.0.1 to 20.0.6. While this is a minor version bump, it's important to ensure all NX packages are updated consistently to maintain workspace stability. #!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining references to old NX version
rg "20.0.[1-5]" || echo "No old NX versions found"
# Verify nx.json configuration
if [ -f "nx.json" ]; then
cat nx.json
else
echo "nx.json not found"
fiAlso applies to: 74-74
The upgrade from @types/node v20 to v22 is a major version bump that might introduce breaking changes. Please ensure your Node.js runtime version is compatible with this types version. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @vicb - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- The removal of nxCloudId and useLegacyCache from nx.json could impact build caching behavior. Please confirm this change is intentional and won't negatively affect the build pipeline.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
apps/fxc-tiles/Dockerfile (1)
Line range hint
1-11: Consider enhancing the Dockerfile with security and reliability improvements.The Dockerfile could benefit from several production-ready enhancements:
- Add a non-root user for security:
FROM docker.io/node:lts-slim ENV NODE_ENV=production + # Create and use non-root user + RUN groupadd -r nodejs && useradd -r -g nodejs nodejs WORKDIR /usr/src/app RUN npm install -g npm@latest COPY dist/apps/fxc-tiles/package*.json ./ RUN npm ci --no-audit COPY dist/apps/fxc-tiles/unzip.js ./ + # Switch to non-root user + USER nodejs
- Add a health check to improve container orchestration:
+ HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=3s \ + CMD node -e 'try { require("http").get("http://localhost:3000/health", (r) => process.exit(r.statusCode === 200 ? 0 : 1)); } catch(e) { process.exit(1); }'
- Consider adding a .dockerignore file to prevent copying unnecessary files:
node_modules npm-debug.log .git .gitignore *.md .env*apps/fxc-tiles/src/assets/airspaces/download.sh (1)
Line range hint
11-13: Enhance security for external downloads.The script downloads files over HTTP without verifying integrity. Consider these security improvements:
- Use HTTPS instead of HTTP for downloads
- Add checksum verification for downloaded files
- Clean up temporary files after use
Here's a suggested improvement:
echo "# Download Ukraine airspaces" mkdir -p /tmp/asp/ -wget -O /tmp/asp/ukraine.zip "https://fly.net.ua/airspaces/UKRAINE%20(UK).zip" -unzip -o "/tmp/asp/ukraine.zip" -d $DST_FOLDER +TEMP_ZIP="/tmp/asp/ukraine.zip" +wget --https-only -O "$TEMP_ZIP" "https://fly.net.ua/airspaces/UKRAINE%20(UK).zip" +# Add checksum verification here +unzip -o "$TEMP_ZIP" -d "$DST_FOLDER" +rm -f "$TEMP_ZIP"Would you like me to provide the checksum verification code or create an issue to track this security enhancement?
🧰 Tools
🪛 Shellcheck
[warning] 3-3: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
apps/proxy/project.json (2)
Line range hint
67-72: Consider adding container metadata labels.While the container configuration is functional, consider adding metadata labels for better container management.
Add the following options to enhance container metadata:
"options": { "file": "apps/proxy/Dockerfile", "platforms": ["linux/amd64", "linux/arm64"], "engine": "docker", "push": true, "pull": true, - "tags": ["us-docker.pkg.dev/fly-xc/docker/proxy"] + "tags": ["us-docker.pkg.dev/fly-xc/docker/proxy"], + "labels": { + "org.opencontainers.image.source": "https://github.com/your-org/your-repo", + "org.opencontainers.image.version": "${version}", + "org.opencontainers.image.created": "${timestamp}" + } }
Line range hint
67-72: Consider caching optimization for multi-platform builds.The configuration enables multi-platform builds but might benefit from build caching optimization.
Consider adding cache configuration to speed up multi-platform builds:
"options": { "file": "apps/proxy/Dockerfile", "platforms": ["linux/amd64", "linux/arm64"], "engine": "docker", "push": true, "pull": true, - "tags": ["us-docker.pkg.dev/fly-xc/docker/proxy"] + "tags": ["us-docker.pkg.dev/fly-xc/docker/proxy"], + "cache-from": ["type=registry,ref=us-docker.pkg.dev/fly-xc/docker/proxy:buildcache"], + "cache-to": ["type=registry,ref=us-docker.pkg.dev/fly-xc/docker/proxy:buildcache,mode=max"] }apps/fxc-tiles/README.md (1)
Line range hint
20-22: Consider removing or updating the ZIP section.Since this section is marked as "outdated" and "probably not needed", consider either:
- Removing it completely if it's no longer relevant
- Updating it with current information if there are cases where it might still be needed
apps/fetcher/project.json (1)
Line range hint
72-78: Well-structured container configuration.The container target configuration is robust with:
- Proper build dependencies
- Multi-architecture support (amd64/arm64)
- Appropriate container registry configuration
The multi-architecture support is particularly valuable for flexibility in deployment targets. Consider documenting the build requirements for multi-arch support in the project's README.
apps/run/project.json (1)
Line range hint
84-89: Consider adding Dockerfile validation in the container target.To prevent build failures, consider adding a pre-build validation step to ensure the Dockerfile exists before attempting the container build.
Add a validation command to the container target:
"container": { "executor": "@nx-tools/nx-container:build", "dependsOn": ["build"], + "prebuild": { + "executor": "nx:run-commands", + "options": { + "command": "test -f apps/run/Dockerfile || (echo 'Dockerfile not found' && exit 1)" + } + }, "options": { "file": "apps/run/Dockerfile", "platforms": ["linux/amd64", "linux/arm64"],apps/fxc-front/vite.config.mts (1)
The path in the code is incorrect and needs to be updated
The code is looking for the file at
/fxc-tiles/src/assets/tiles/tiles-info.json, but the actual file exists at/fxc-tiles/src/assets/airspaces/tiles-info.json. This mismatch will cause the file existence check to fail.
- Update the path in
vite.config.mtsfrom:to:join(__dirname, '/..', '/fxc-tiles/src/assets/tiles/tiles-info.json')join(__dirname, '/..', '/fxc-tiles/src/assets/airspaces/tiles-info.json')🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
101-109: Verify the new tiles-info.json path exists.The path has been changed from 'airspaces' to 'fxc-tiles'. Let's verify that the new file exists and is tracked by git.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and git tracking of tiles-info.json # Test 1: Check if the file exists fd -t f "tiles-info.json" apps/fxc-tiles # Test 2: Verify git tracks the file git ls-files "apps/fxc-tiles/**/tiles-info.json" # Test 3: Check git history to ensure the file was moved/renamed git log --follow --name-status --format="%H" -- "apps/fxc-tiles/**/tiles-info.json"Length of output: 375
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
.eslintrc.json(1 hunks).gitignore(1 hunks)apps/fetcher/project.json(1 hunks)apps/fxc-front/vite.config.mts(1 hunks)apps/fxc-tiles/Dockerfile(1 hunks)apps/fxc-tiles/README.md(2 hunks)apps/fxc-tiles/jest.config.ts(1 hunks)apps/fxc-tiles/project.json(1 hunks)apps/fxc-tiles/src/assets/airspaces/download.sh(1 hunks)apps/proxy/project.json(1 hunks)apps/run/project.json(1 hunks)nx.json(1 hunks)package.json(4 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- .eslintrc.json
- .gitignore
- apps/fxc-tiles/jest.config.ts
- nx.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Shellcheck
apps/fxc-tiles/src/assets/airspaces/download.sh
[warning] 3-3: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
apps/fxc-tiles/Dockerfile (2)
8-9: LGTM! Package files copying follows best practices.
The COPY command for package files is correctly placed before other source files to leverage Docker layer caching effectively.
11-11: Consider adding error handling for the unzip.js script.
While the COPY command is correctly placed after npm install, consider adding error handling to ensure the script exists and has proper permissions.
Let's verify the script's existence and location:
apps/fxc-tiles/src/assets/airspaces/download.sh (1)
7-7: LGTM: Node.js script execution.
The Node.js script execution is properly updated to use the new variable name and includes proper argument passing.
apps/proxy/project.json (1)
Line range hint 67-72: Verify Dockerfile existence and container configuration.
The container configuration looks well-structured, but let's verify the Dockerfile existence and container registry setup.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the Dockerfile content to ensure it supports the multi-platform build configuration specified in the project.json.
Container configuration is properly set up
The verification confirms:
- Dockerfile exists at the correct location
- Container registry path follows the Google Artifact Registry format
- Base image (node:lts-slim) is multi-arch compatible by default
- No platform-specific configurations are needed in the Dockerfile as the base image handles architecture differences transparently
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify Dockerfile existence and container registry path format
echo "Checking Dockerfile existence..."
if [ -f "apps/proxy/Dockerfile" ]; then
echo "✓ Dockerfile exists"
else
echo "✗ Dockerfile not found at apps/proxy/Dockerfile"
fi
# Verify container registry format matches Google Artifact Registry pattern
if [[ "us-docker.pkg.dev/fly-xc/docker/proxy" =~ ^[a-z]+-docker\.pkg\.dev/[a-z0-9-]+/[a-z0-9-]+/[a-z0-9-]+$ ]]; then
echo "✓ Container registry path format is valid"
else
echo "✗ Container registry path format might be incorrect"
fi
Length of output: 359
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Dockerfile content for platform-specific configurations
echo "=== Dockerfile content ==="
cat apps/proxy/Dockerfile
# Look for any platform-specific build arguments or configurations
echo -e "\n=== Platform-related configurations ==="
grep -i "platform\|arch\|amd64\|arm64" apps/proxy/Dockerfile
Length of output: 715
apps/fxc-tiles/README.md (2)
9-9: LGTM! More descriptive command name.
The change from download to download-airspaces makes the command's purpose clearer and more specific.
25-25: LGTM! Path update aligns with restructuring.
The path update from airspaces to fxc-tiles is consistent with the broader restructuring changes in this PR.
apps/fetcher/project.json (1)
73-73: Verify Dockerfile existence and location.
The path looks correct, following the project's convention of co-locating Dockerfiles with their respective applications.
Let's verify the Dockerfile exists and check for consistency across other applications:
✅ Verification successful
Dockerfile path is correctly configured and follows project conventions
The verification confirms:
- The Dockerfile exists at the specified path
apps/fetcher/Dockerfile - The configuration follows the consistent pattern across other applications (run, proxy) where Dockerfiles are co-located with their respective apps
- All container configurations in project.json files follow the same structure
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify Dockerfile existence and check pattern consistency
echo "Checking Dockerfile existence:"
if [ -f "apps/fetcher/Dockerfile" ]; then
echo "✓ apps/fetcher/Dockerfile exists"
else
echo "✗ apps/fetcher/Dockerfile not found"
fi
echo -e "\nChecking Dockerfile patterns across apps:"
# Find all project.json files and check their Dockerfile references
fd project.json apps/ --exec jq -r '.targets.container.options.file // empty' {} \;
Length of output: 436
apps/run/project.json (1)
84-84: LGTM! Verify Dockerfile existence.
The Dockerfile path specification follows the correct project structure convention and aligns with similar changes in other applications.
Let's verify the Dockerfile exists at the specified location:
✅ Verification successful
Dockerfile path configuration verified successfully
The specified Dockerfile exists at apps/run/Dockerfile and follows a consistent pattern with other applications in the workspace (proxy, fetcher). The path configuration is correctly aligned with the project structure.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Dockerfile exists and follows similar pattern across apps
# Test 1: Check if the Dockerfile exists
if [ -f "apps/run/Dockerfile" ]; then
echo "✓ Dockerfile exists at apps/run/Dockerfile"
else
echo "✗ Dockerfile not found at apps/run/Dockerfile"
fi
# Test 2: Check for consistent pattern across other apps
fd -t f "project.json" apps/ -x grep -l "Dockerfile" {} \;
Length of output: 259
apps/fxc-tiles/project.json (2)
79-79: LGTM: Test coverage path updated correctly.
The test output path has been properly updated to align with the new application name.
Line range hint 1-116: Inconsistent naming patterns detected.
While the test coverage path has been updated to use 'fxc-tiles', several other paths in the configuration still reference 'airspaces':
- Main entry point:
apps/fxc-tiles/src/app/airspaces/unzip.ts - All additionalEntryPoints under the build target
- Asset paths under
assetsconfiguration
This mixed naming pattern could lead to confusion and maintenance issues.
Let's verify if this is part of a broader renaming pattern:
Consider updating all paths consistently to use either 'airspaces' or 'fxc-tiles' based on the intended architecture. Would you like assistance in generating a consistent configuration?
package.json (3)
21-31: LGTM: Consistent @nx package versions
All @nx packages have been consistently updated to version 20.0.6, which is the recommended approach to maintain compatibility between nx packages.
Also applies to: 74-74
89-91: Verify service worker functionality after Workbox updates
The Workbox packages (workbox-precaching and workbox-routing) have been updated from 7.1.0 to 7.3.0. While these are minor version updates, they could affect service worker functionality.
Let's check for service worker configurations that might need attention:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for service worker configurations and usage
echo "Checking for service worker configurations..."
# Search for service worker registration
rg -l "serviceWorker|workbox" --type ts --type js
# Search for Workbox configuration files
fd -e js -e ts -e json --type f --exec grep -l "workbox" {} \;46-46: Verify Node.js runtime compatibility with @types/node v22
The major version bump of @types/node from v20 to v22 might require corresponding updates to the Node.js runtime version in your deployment environments.
Let's check the Node.js version requirements:
✅ Verification successful
@types/node v22 update appears safe to proceed
The codebase doesn't specify any explicit Node.js version constraints:
- No
enginesfield in package.json - No
.nvmrcor similar version configuration files - No Node.js version constraints in GitHub workflows
The update should be safe as the project already uses modern Node.js tooling:
- Uses recent versions of tools like
ts-node(^10.9.2) - Has other up-to-date Node.js related dependencies
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Node.js version specifications in the codebase
echo "Checking for Node.js version specifications..."
# Check package.json for engines field
cat package.json | grep -A 5 '"engines"' || echo "No engines field in package.json"
# Check .nvmrc if it exists
if [ -f .nvmrc ]; then
echo "Found .nvmrc:"
cat .nvmrc
else
echo "No .nvmrc file found"
fi
# Check for Docker Node.js base images
echo "Checking Dockerfile Node.js versions:"
fd Dockerfile --type f --exec grep -l "FROM.*node:" {} \;
Length of output: 574
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check Node.js version requirements
# Check package.json content
echo "=== Checking package.json ==="
cat package.json | jq '.engines'
# Check for any Node.js version references in package.json
echo -e "\n=== Checking Node.js version references in package.json ==="
cat package.json | grep -i "node"
# Look for any configuration files that might specify Node version
echo -e "\n=== Looking for Node.js version configuration files ==="
fd -e nvmrc -e npmrc -e node-version
# Check for any GitHub Actions workflow files that might specify Node version
echo -e "\n=== Checking GitHub Actions workflows for Node.js version ==="
fd -e yml -e yaml -p .github/workflows --exec grep -l "node-version" {} \;
Length of output: 941
vicb
force-pushed
the
Virtual-branch-1935744840
branch
from
fd03ba8
to
cda717f
Compare
Summary by Sourcery
Update directory paths and configurations for the fxc-tiles application and add Dockerfile specifications to build options for multiple applications.
Enhancements:
Build:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
fxc-tilesapplication for clarity.Chores
Style