Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VTGate StreamExecute rpc to return session as response #13131

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
May 30, 2023

Conversation

harshit-gangal
Copy link
Member

@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal commented May 23, 2023

Description

This PR fixes the issue with StreamExecute VTGate RPC response. It adds the VTGate Session to the response.
This fixes all the side effects caused by not returning the modified session.

The Session is sent as the last message on the stream after all the Query Results are sent. So, the last stream message will have QueryResult as nil and Session as not nil.
Any error that happened during the query phase will be sent only after sending the Session.

Note: This is not an issue if MySQL clients are used to connect to VTGate.

Related Issue(s)

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on the CI
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels May 23, 2023
@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented May 23, 2023

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • If this is a change that users need to know about, please apply the release notes (needs details) label so that merging is blocked unless the summary release notes document is included.
  • If a test is added or modified, there should be a documentation on top of the test to explain what the expected behavior is what the test does.

If a new flag is being introduced:

  • Is it really necessary to add this flag?
  • Flag names should be clear and intuitive (as far as possible)
  • Help text should be descriptive.
  • Flag names should use dashes (-) as word separators rather than underscores (_).

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow should be required, the maintainer team should be notified.

Bug fixes

  • There should be at least one unit or end-to-end test.
  • The Pull Request description should include a link to an issue that describes the bug.

Non-trivial changes

  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.

New/Existing features

  • Should be documented, either by modifying the existing documentation or creating new documentation.
  • New features should have a link to a feature request issue or an RFC that documents the use cases, corner cases and test cases.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from VTop, if used there.

@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v17.0.0 milestone May 23, 2023
@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal added Type: Bug and removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request labels May 23, 2023
@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal marked this pull request as ready for review May 24, 2023 15:06
@@ -144,7 +144,11 @@ func (sn *VTGateSession) StreamExecute(ctx context.Context, query string, bindVa
// StreamExecute is only used for SELECT queries that don't change
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this still true?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

	// StreamExecute is only used for SELECT queries that don't change
	// the session. So, the protocol doesn't return an updated session.
	// This may change in the future.

For sure it has changed and this is the future :)

@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal added the release notes (needs details) This PR needs to be listed in the release notes in a dedicated section (deprecation notice, etc...) label May 25, 2023
Signed-off-by: Harshit Gangal <[email protected]>
@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal removed the release notes (needs details) This PR needs to be listed in the release notes in a dedicated section (deprecation notice, etc...) label May 26, 2023
@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal mentioned this pull request May 30, 2023
42 tasks
Copy link
Member

@GuptaManan100 GuptaManan100 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal merged commit 2c678fb into vitessio:main May 30, 2023
@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal deleted the streamexec-session branch May 30, 2023 11:19
frouioui pushed a commit to planetscale/vitess that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2023
…n as response (vitessio#2289)

* cherry pick of 13131

* fix the merge for e2e test

Signed-off-by: Harshit Gangal <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Harshit Gangal <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Harshit Gangal <[email protected]>
mattrobenolt added a commit to planetscale/psdbproxy that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2024
…15)

This is to accommodate the breaking API change from:

vitessio/vitess#13131

Currently PlanetScale explicitly ignores these results so it doesn't
break clients, so this is pre-emptively support the new rows.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

VTGate StreamExecute grpc api does not support transactions
5 participants