Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-17.0] fix: error.as method usage to send pointer to the reference type expected (#13496) #13610

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

frouioui
Copy link
Member

Description

This is a backport of #13496

@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Jul 25, 2023

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • If this is a change that users need to know about, please apply the release notes (needs details) label so that merging is blocked unless the summary release notes document is included.
  • If a test is added or modified, there should be a documentation on top of the test to explain what the expected behavior is what the test does.

If a new flag is being introduced:

  • Is it really necessary to add this flag?
  • Flag names should be clear and intuitive (as far as possible)
  • Help text should be descriptive.
  • Flag names should use dashes (-) as word separators rather than underscores (_).

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow should be required, the maintainer team should be notified.

Bug fixes

  • There should be at least one unit or end-to-end test.
  • The Pull Request description should include a link to an issue that describes the bug.

Non-trivial changes

  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.

New/Existing features

  • Should be documented, either by modifying the existing documentation or creating new documentation.
  • New features should have a link to a feature request issue or an RFC that documents the use cases, corner cases and test cases.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from VTop, if used there.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Jul 25, 2023
@frouioui frouioui removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request labels Jul 25, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v17.0.1 milestone Jul 25, 2023
@frouioui frouioui mentioned this pull request Jul 25, 2023
28 tasks
@harshit-gangal
Copy link
Member

#13590 is superset of this change

@frouioui frouioui added Backport to: release-15.0 Benchmark me Add label to PR to run benchmarks and removed Backport to: release-15.0 Benchmark me Add label to PR to run benchmarks labels Jul 26, 2023
@vitessio vitessio deleted a comment from arewefastyet bot Jul 26, 2023
@frouioui frouioui added Benchmark me Add label to PR to run benchmarks and removed Benchmark me Add label to PR to run benchmarks labels Jul 26, 2023
@vitessio vitessio deleted a comment from arewefastyet bot Jul 26, 2023
@frouioui frouioui added Benchmark me Add label to PR to run benchmarks and removed Benchmark me Add label to PR to run benchmarks labels Jul 26, 2023
@vitessio vitessio deleted a comment from arewefastyet bot Jul 26, 2023
@frouioui frouioui added Benchmark me Add label to PR to run benchmarks and removed Benchmark me Add label to PR to run benchmarks labels Jul 26, 2023
@vitessio vitessio deleted a comment from arewefastyet bot Jul 26, 2023
@arewefastyet
Copy link

arewefastyet bot commented Jul 26, 2023

Hello! 👋

This Pull Request is now handled by arewefastyet. The current HEAD and future commits will be benchmarked.

You can find the performance comparison on the arewefastyet website.

@frouioui frouioui removed the Benchmark me Add label to PR to run benchmarks label Jul 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants