Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

begin viperizing tabletserver - max/warn result size, cache memory #14548

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

begin viperizing tabletserver - max/warn result size, cache memory #14548

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ajm188
Copy link
Contributor

@ajm188 ajm188 commented Nov 19, 2023

Description

Related Issue(s)

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on the CI
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

@ajm188 ajm188 requested a review from deepthi November 19, 2023 13:52
@vitess-bot vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Nov 19, 2023

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Nov 19, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v19.0.0 milestone Nov 19, 2023
@ajm188 ajm188 force-pushed the andrew/viperize-tabletserver branch from b53c471 to 2415efc Compare November 27, 2023 21:14
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is being marked as stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. To rectify, you may do any of the following:

  • Push additional commits to the associated branch.
  • Remove the stale label.
  • Add a comment indicating why it is not stale.

If no action is taken within 7 days, this PR will be closed.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale Marks PRs as stale after a period of inactivity, which are then closed after a grace period. label Dec 28, 2023
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 4, 2024

This PR was closed because it has been stale for 7 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Jan 4, 2024
@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal mentioned this pull request Oct 23, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@deepthi deepthi Awaiting requested review from deepthi

@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal Awaiting requested review from harshit-gangal harshit-gangal will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review harshit-gangal is a code owner

@systay systay Awaiting requested review from systay systay will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review systay is a code owner

@shlomi-noach shlomi-noach Awaiting requested review from shlomi-noach shlomi-noach will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review shlomi-noach is a code owner

@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps Awaiting requested review from rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review rohit-nayak-ps is a code owner

@timvaillancourt timvaillancourt Awaiting requested review from timvaillancourt timvaillancourt will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review timvaillancourt is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says Stale Marks PRs as stale after a period of inactivity, which are then closed after a grace period.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v19.0.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@ajm188