-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Bugfix]: serialize config instances by value when using --trust-remote-code #6751
Merged
youkaichao
merged 16 commits into
vllm-project:main
from
tjohnson31415:fix-distributed-trust-remote-code
Oct 22, 2024
+103
−28
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d03107a
feat: use cloudpickle to serialize transformers_modules by value
tjohnson31415 1f6336e
add logging if registration fails
tjohnson31415 2c67950
refactor: move by-value registration to its own function
tjohnson31415 2b318c7
test: add trust_remote_code w/ ray to PP tests
tjohnson31415 ea1288c
ci: add trust_remote_code model to pp tests
tjohnson31415 566ca63
Remove unintentional default
DarkLight1337 83fa758
Add `multi_node_only` option
DarkLight1337 ee2390b
fix
DarkLight1337 58b7526
fix 2
DarkLight1337 8e9d429
fix: cloudpickle serialization with multiprocessing too
tjohnson31415 a9d954e
remove fixme after local validation
tjohnson31415 14b494c
Fix Phi3-mini-4k test not actually being run
DarkLight1337 c4bcedc
format
DarkLight1337 26cdfbb
fix
DarkLight1337 6f540b5
format
DarkLight1337 ab7b095
Merge main and resolve conflicts
tjohnson31415 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this should be removed, and properly tested with it's absence, as part of this PR's goals.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That was my plan as well but I undid the removal due to this comment from @youkaichao. It doesn't hurt to keep it in for now if it can help the PR get merged. The removal can be a quick follow-on PR where we can test edge cases.