Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

added forceMTOM option and updated the Readme #1086

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 8, 2019
Merged

added forceMTOM option and updated the Readme #1086

merged 5 commits into from
Aug 8, 2019

Conversation

g-m-a
Copy link
Contributor

@g-m-a g-m-a commented Aug 8, 2019 •
edited
Loading

  • cleaned some of the previous code (lame console.log leftover)
  • added forceMTOM in the request options so that you can send MTOM request even without having binary attachments to the request. Magically enough some services always use MTOM.
  • updated the Readme with some info on the attachments and forceMTOM options

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 94.476% when pulling bc23539 on g-m-a:master into 5af5fab on vpulim:master.

@jsdevel jsdevel merged commit aee79a8 into vpulim:master Aug 8, 2019
@jsdevel
Copy link
Collaborator

jsdevel commented Aug 8, 2019

thanks!

@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2019
Closed
Danail-Irinkov pushed a commit to Danail-Irinkov/node-soap that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2020
@g-m-a @Danail-Irinkov
added forceMTOM option and updated the Readme (vpulim#1086)
9f17e8e 
* fixed MTOM removing soap12header

* cleaned code + added test

* added forceMTOM extra request option to send MTOM requests even if no attachement

* Update Readme.md
This was referenced Mar 15, 2020
Merged
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@g-m-a @coveralls @jsdevel