Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TACACS Authentication #1518

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 10, 2024
Merged

TACACS Authentication #1518

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 10, 2024

Conversation

aslanvyos
Copy link
Contributor

@aslanvyos aslanvyos commented Aug 8, 2024

Clarification about TACACS

Change Summary

This update clarifies that VyOS currently supports only Authentication via TACACS. Authorization and Accounting are not supported.

Related Task(s)

Related PR(s)

Backport

Checklist:

Clarification about TACACS
@aslanvyos aslanvyos requested a review from rebortg as a code owner August 8, 2024 10:33
@@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ TACACS+
In addition to :abbr:`RADIUS (Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service)`,
:abbr:`TACACS (Terminal Access Controller Access Control System)` can also be
found in large deployments.
VyOS supports only `Authentication` via the `TACACS` server.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd say "VyOS only supports authentication via TACACS+ servers but does not support authorization or accounting yet" to clarify the point.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK got it
I will change

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I made changes

@rebortg rebortg merged commit 9ef6d85 into vyos:sagitta Aug 10, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants