Add Privacy and Security Section #168
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The sections on "Personal Information" and "Audio format preference" highlight the two critical aspects in DAPT that need to be added to the considerations already made for TTML2. At a later stage of the publication process of DAPT, it may be considered to mark the Audio Section with a fingerprinting icon, as suggested in Best Practice 3: Mark features that contribute to fingerprintability of Mitigating Browser Fingerprinting in Web Specifications.
|
The HR review request issue templates for requesting privacy reviews and security reviews both want there to be separate sections for each of Security Considerations and Privacy Considerations. I will refactor this pull request to make the proposed Privacy and Security Considerations into just "Privacy Considerations" and to add a new Security Considerations section that says that since the specification defines only a document format, with no APIs, there are no security considerations. |
Address review feedback. The images themselves are slightly cryptic and don't have any link back to something that explains why they're there, so I'm not sure about the overall benefit.
nigelmegitt
force-pushed
the
issue-0166-privacy-and-security-section
branch
from
463b098
to
7134c29
Compare
to satisfy the horizontal review requirements of the groups that review for privacy and security.
We may file an issue for that point (not to prevent all considerations text into one section), but that point is not seriously picked nor determined, AFAIU. Also pubrules points about two sections, but we can pass even if we just have one section covers two. e.g. |
Closes #166.
Preview | Diff