Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
mintues for 21 FEB 2024
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
coolharsh55 committed Feb 26, 2024
1 parent ec80997 commit 7fa3251
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 143 additions and 0 deletions.
39 changes: 39 additions & 0 deletions code/minutes-generator/data/meeting-2024-02-21.irc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
20:08:55 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #dpvcg
20:09:03 <harsh> Scribe: harsh
20:09:10 <harsh> Meeting: DPVCG Meeting Call
20:09:13 <harsh> Chair: harsh
20:09:23 <harsh> Present: harsh, delaram, ted georg, beatriz
20:10:04 <harsh> Regrets: iain, tytti
20:09:37 <harsh> Date: 21 FEB 2024
20:09:50 <harsh> Agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/31f00434-f01b-431d-a9d9-4ef690dd7c6d/20240221T150000/
20:09:57 <harsh> Meeting minutes: https://w3id.org/dpv/meetings
20:10:04 <harsh> purl for this meeting: https://w3id.org/dpv/meetings/meeting-2024-02-21
20:10:04 <harsh> Topic: Age Verification
20:10:04 <ghurlbot> https://github.com/w3c/dpv/issues/128 -> Issue 128 Add dpv:AgeVerification as a purpose concept (by besteves4)
20:10:04 <harsh> accepted concept
20:10:04 <harsh> Topic: GDPR Rights Justifications
20:10:04 <ghurlbot> https://github.com/w3c/dpv/issues/63 -> Issue 63 Add Right Non-fulfilment Justifications for GDPR’s rights (by besteves4)
20:10:04 <harsh> beatriz: okay with the structure, but more rights and justifications - discussion on whether/how we model them.
20:10:04 <harsh> beatriz: (email FEB-16) going through the mentioned rights to see justifications, going through GDPR for more justifications. Article 34 - some justifications there as well for Communication of a personal data breach to the data subject. Article 23 - right to be informed about restrictions. Article 27. We don't have anything from Article 78 and 79 - judicial rememdies. Article 22-3 “the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.
20:10:04 <harsh> georg: Article 34(3) has justifications for why the breach was not communicated. These are justifications used in compliance but do not need to be communicated. So we should
20:10:04 <harsh> georg: Article 23(3-h) - what is the justification here?
20:10:04 <harsh> beatriz: Should we model the 'right' mentioned here?
20:10:04 <harsh> \ discussion - no, this is a right as in the implementing act in national law
20:10:04 <harsh> beatriz: Adding Art. 77-79 as 3 three additional rights to GDPR extension.
20:10:04 <harsh> georg: Art.22.3 “the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision”?
20:10:04 <harsh> harsh: 22-1 is the right, 22-3 refers to the same right
20:10:04 <harsh> georg: 22-2 is the three justifications for 22-1
20:10:04 <harsh> harsh: 22-3 and 22-4 are specific restrictions on the justifications in 22-2, so we don't necessarily need them as separate justifications - we can wait for case law and AG opinions to evaluate our interpreations are correct before we model them e.g. 22-4 can be justifications for use of special categories
20:10:04 <harsh> Topic: AI Act
20:10:04 <ghurlbot> https://github.com/w3c/dpv/issues/106 -> Issue 106 Propose concepts from the AI Act (by coolharsh55)
20:10:04 <harsh> delaram: these are concepts from Article 3, the rest of the Act is to be modeled
20:10:04 <harsh> georg: post from Dr. Laura who is Senior Policy Advisor at EU Parliament comparing AI Act and GDPR in terms of no of articles and recitals https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dr-laura-caroli-0a96a8a_aiact-activity-7166016973645037568-pA4A?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop
20:10:04 <harsh> delaram: definitions are not expected to change, clause numbering may change. Working on AIRO and VAIR at the moment, to be added here (AI Act extension) once that is done.
20:10:04 <harsh> harsh: where do we put them in DPV vocabularies? How do we proceed? Do we take AI Act? Or go through specific topics e.g. putting AI in deployment?
20:10:04 <harsh> delaram: would be better to look at all related concepts together in one place
20:10:04 <harsh> beatriz: does AI system go in tech?
20:10:04 <harsh> delaram: yes, the general concept will go in tech and the AI Act specific definition will go into the AI Act extension
20:10:04 <harsh> harsh: interested in Annex III high-risk clause analysis, and connecting it with GDPR's DPIA. Tytti is also doing this kind of work and would be interested in this.
20:10:04 <harsh> Topic: Next Meeting
20:10:04 <harsh> \ Next meeting will be in 1 week, on WED FEB-28 15:00 WET / 16:00 CET.
20:10:04 <harsh> \ Topics for discussion are updates on DPV v2, github repo and issues, rights exercise, discussion on AI Act, and Tech/AI vocabulary.
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions meetings/index.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
<h1>DPVCG Meeting Minutes</h1>
<p>See <a href="https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/dpvcg/calendar">W3C DPVCG Calendar</a> for upcoming meetings, agenda, and joining instructions.</p>
<ol reversed>
<li><a href="https://w3id.org/dpv/meetings/meeting-2024-02-21.html">DPVCG Meeting 21 February 2024 Wednesday</a></li>
<li><a href="https://w3id.org/dpv/meetings/meeting-2024-02-14.html">DPVCG Meeting 14 February 2024 Wednesday</a></li>
<li><a href="https://w3id.org/dpv/meetings/meeting-2024-02-07.html">DPVCG Meeting 07 February 2024 Wednesday</a></li>
<li><a href="https://w3id.org/dpv/meetings/meeting-2024-01-31.html">DPVCG Meeting 31 January 2024 Wednesday</a></li>
Expand Down
103 changes: 103 additions & 0 deletions meetings/meeting-2024-02-21.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang=en>
<head>
<meta charset=utf-8>
<title>DPVCG Meeting Call &ndash; 21 FEB 2024</title>
<meta name=viewport content="width=device-width">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" title="2018" href="https://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/scribe2/public.css">
<link rel="alternate stylesheet" type="text/css" title="2004" href="https://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/base.css">
<link rel="alternate stylesheet" type="text/css" title="2004" href="https://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/public.css">
<link rel="alternate stylesheet" type="text/css" title="2004" href="https://www.w3.org/2004/02/minutes-style.css">
<link rel="alternate stylesheet" type="text/css" title="Fancy" href="https://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/scribe2/fancy.css">
<link rel="alternate stylesheet" type="text/css" title="Typewriter" href="https://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/scribe2/tt-member.css">
</head>

<body>
<header>
<p><a href="https://www.w3.org/"><img src="https://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/2016/logos/W3C" alt=W3C border=0 height=48 width=72></a></p>

<h1>DPVCG Meeting Call</h1>
<h2>21 FEB 2024</h2>

<nav id=links>
<a href="https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/31f00434-f01b-431d-a9d9-4ef690dd7c6d/20240221T150000/"><img alt="Agenda." title="Agenda" src="https://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/scribe2/chronometer.png"></a>
</nav>
</header>

<div id=prelims>
<div id=attendees>
<h2>Attendees</h2>
<dl class=intro>
<dt>Present</dt><dd>beatriz, delaram, harsh, ted georg</dd>
<dt>Regrets</dt><dd>iain, tytti</dd>
<dt>Chair</dt><dd>harsh</dd>
<dt>Scribe</dt><dd>harsh</dd>
</dl>
</div>

<nav id=toc>
<h2>Contents</h2>
<ol>
<li><a href="#t01">Age Verification</a></li>
<li><a href="#t02">GDPR Rights Justifications</a></li>
<li><a href="#t03">AI Act</a></li>
<li><a href="#t04">Next Meeting</a></li>
</ol>
</nav>
</div>

<main id=meeting class=meeting>
<h2>Meeting minutes</h2>
<section><p id=x008 class=summary>Meeting minutes: <a href="https://w3id.org/dpv/meetings">https://<wbr>w3id.org/<wbr>dpv/<wbr>meetings</a></p>
<p id=x009 class=summary>purl for this meeting: <a href="https://w3id.org/dpv/meetings/meeting-2024-02-21">https://<wbr>w3id.org/<wbr>dpv/<wbr>meetings/<wbr>meeting-2024-02-21</a></p>
</section>

<section>
<h3 id=t01>Age Verification</h3>
<p id=x011 class=bot><cite>&lt;ghurlbot&gt;</cite> <strong><a href="https://github.com/w3c/dpv/issues/128">Issue 128</a></strong> Add dpv:AgeVerification as a purpose concept (by besteves4)</p>
<p id=x012 class=summary>accepted concept</p>
</section>

<section>
<h3 id=t02>GDPR Rights Justifications</h3>
<p id=x014 class=bot><cite>&lt;ghurlbot&gt;</cite> <strong><a href="https://github.com/w3c/dpv/issues/63">Issue 63</a></strong> Add Right Non-fulfilment Justifications for GDPR’s rights (by besteves4)</p>
<p id=x015 class="phone s01"><cite>beatriz:</cite> okay with the structure, but more rights and justifications - discussion on whether/how we model them.</p>
<p id=x016 class="phone s01"><cite>beatriz:</cite> (email FEB-16) going through the mentioned rights to see justifications, going through GDPR for more justifications. Article 34 - some justifications there as well for Communication of a personal data breach to the data subject. Article 23 - right to be informed about restrictions. Article 27. We don't have anything from Article 78 and 79 - judicial rememdies. Article 22-3 “the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.</p>
<p id=x017 class="phone s02"><cite>georg:</cite> Article 34(3) has justifications for why the breach was not communicated. These are justifications used in compliance but do not need to be communicated. So we should </p>
<p id=x018 class="phone s02"><cite>georg:</cite> Article 23(3-h) - what is the justification here? </p>
<p id=x019 class="phone s01"><cite>beatriz:</cite> Should we model the 'right' mentioned here?</p>
<p id=x020 class=summary> discussion - no, this is a right as in the implementing act in national law</p>
<p id=x021 class="phone s01"><cite>beatriz:</cite> Adding Art. 77-79 as 3 three additional rights to GDPR extension. </p>
<p id=x022 class="phone s02"><cite>georg:</cite> Art.22.3 “the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision”? </p>
<p id=x023 class="phone s03"><cite>harsh:</cite> 22-1 is the right, 22-3 refers to the same right</p>
<p id=x024 class="phone s02"><cite>georg:</cite> 22-2 is the three justifications for 22-1</p>
<p id=x025 class="phone s03"><cite>harsh:</cite> 22-3 and 22-4 are specific restrictions on the justifications in 22-2, so we don't necessarily need them as separate justifications - we can wait for case law and AG opinions to evaluate our interpreations are correct before we model them e.g. 22-4 can be justifications for use of special categories</p>
</section>

<section>
<h3 id=t03>AI Act</h3>
<p id=x027 class=bot><cite>&lt;ghurlbot&gt;</cite> <strong><a href="https://github.com/w3c/dpv/issues/106">Issue 106</a></strong> Propose concepts from the AI Act (by coolharsh55)</p>
<p id=x028 class="phone s04"><cite>delaram:</cite> these are concepts from Article 3, the rest of the Act is to be modeled </p>
<p id=x029 class="phone s02"><cite>georg:</cite> post from Dr. Laura who is Senior Policy Advisor at EU Parliament comparing AI Act and GDPR in terms of no of articles and recitals <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dr-laura-caroli-0a96a8a_aiact-activity-7166016973645037568-pA4A?utm_source=share&amp;utm_medium=member_desktop">https://<wbr>www.linkedin.com/<wbr>posts/<wbr>dr-laura-caroli-0a96a8a_aiact-activity-7166016973645037568-pA4A?utm_source=share&amp;utm_medium=member_desktop</a></p>
<p id=x030 class="phone s04"><cite>delaram:</cite> definitions are not expected to change, clause numbering may change. Working on AIRO and VAIR at the moment, to be added here (AI Act extension) once that is done.</p>
<p id=x031 class="phone s03"><cite>harsh:</cite> where do we put them in DPV vocabularies? How do we proceed? Do we take AI Act? Or go through specific topics e.g. putting AI in deployment?</p>
<p id=x032 class="phone s04"><cite>delaram:</cite> would be better to look at all related concepts together in one place</p>
<p id=x033 class="phone s01"><cite>beatriz:</cite> does AI system go in tech?</p>
<p id=x034 class="phone s04"><cite>delaram:</cite> yes, the general concept will go in tech and the AI Act specific definition will go into the AI Act extension</p>
<p id=x035 class="phone s03"><cite>harsh:</cite> interested in Annex III high-risk clause analysis, and connecting it with GDPR's DPIA. Tytti is also doing this kind of work and would be interested in this.</p>
</section>

<section>
<h3 id=t04>Next Meeting</h3>
<p id=x037 class=summary> Next meeting will be in 1 week, on WED FEB-28 15:00 WET / 16:00 CET.</p>
<p id=x038 class=summary> Topics for discussion are updates on DPV v2, github repo and issues, rights exercise, discussion on AI Act, and Tech/AI vocabulary.</p>
</section>
</main>


<address>Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by <a
href="https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html"
>scribe.perl</a> version 217 (Fri Apr 7 17:23:01 2023 UTC).</address>

</body>
</html>

0 comments on commit 7fa3251

Please sign in to comment.