Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial: Introduce 'push subscription owner' concept #367

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member

@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres commented Dec 11, 2023

Part of #360

We propose adding 'push subscription owner' concept, to allow a Window to eventually also be the owner of a push subscription (not just a service worker).

This makes no substantive changes at this point... just lays down infrastructure that we can then use for branching.


Preview | Diff

Comment on lines +182 to +183
Future updates to this specification could expand the definition of a [=push subscription
owner=] to include other types, broadening the range of possible implementations.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd like to see that future update before adding another layer of indirection. Do you have something more concrete to share?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I can send the larger PR... thought I'd start small and build it up, but happy to just send the larger change that separates between service worker and using window.navigator.pushManager.

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member Author

closing in favor or #368

@annevk annevk deleted the subscription_owner branch July 10, 2024 14:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants