Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cherry-pick: Add the random trace id flag (#474) #486

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2022
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
35 changes: 27 additions & 8 deletions spec/20-http_request_header_format.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -100,13 +100,17 @@ trace-flags = 2HEXDIGLC ; 8 bit flags. Currently, only one bit is used. S

#### trace-id

This is the ID of the whole trace forest and is used to uniquely identify a <a href="#dfn-distributed-traces">distributed trace</a> through a system. It is represented as a 16-byte array, for example, `4bf92f3577b34da6a3ce929d0e0e4736`. All bytes as zero (`00000000000000000000000000000000`) is considered an invalid value.
This is the ID of the whole trace forest and is used to uniquely identify a <a href="#dfn-distributed-traces">distributed trace</a> through a system.
It is represented as a 16-byte array, for example, `4bf92f3577b34da6a3ce929d0e0e4736`.
All bytes as zero (`00000000000000000000000000000000`) is considered an invalid value.

If the `trace-id` value is invalid (for example if it contains non-allowed characters or all zeros), vendors MUST ignore the `traceparent`.
The value of `trace-id` SHOULD be globally unique.
One recommended method to ensure global uniqueness, as well as to address some privacy and security considerations, to a satisfactory degree of certainty is to randomly (or pseudo-randomly) generate the `trace-id`.
Implementers SHOULD use a `trace-id` generation method which randomly (or pseudo-randomly) generates at least the right-most 7 bytes of the ID.
If the right-most 7 bytes are randomly (or pseudo-randomly) generated, the corresponding [random trace id flag](#random-trace-id-flag) SHOULD be set.
For more details, see [considerations for trace-id field generation](#considerations-for-trace-id-field-generation).

See [considerations for trace-id field
generation](#considerations-for-trace-id-field-generation) for recommendations
on how to operate with `trace-id`.
If the `trace-id` value is invalid (for example if it contains non-allowed characters or all zeros), vendors MUST ignore the `traceparent`.

#### parent-id

Expand All @@ -116,6 +120,8 @@ Vendors MUST ignore the `traceparent` when the `parent-id` is invalid (for examp

#### trace-flags

The current version of this specification (`00`) supports only two flags: `sampled` and `random-trace-id`.

An <a data-cite='!BIT-FIELD#firstHeading'>8-bit field</a> that controls tracing flags such as sampling, trace level, etc. These flags are recommendations given by the caller rather than strict rules to follow for three reasons:

1. An untrusted caller may be able to abuse a tracing system by setting these flags maliciously.
Expand All @@ -126,20 +132,22 @@ You can find more in the section [Security considerations](#security-considerati

Like other fields, `trace-flags` is hex-encoded. For example, all `8` flags set would be `ff` and no flags set would be `00`.

As this is a bit field, you cannot interpret flags by decoding the hex value and looking at the resulting number. For example, a flag `00000001` could be encoded as `01` in hex, or `09` in hex if present with the flag `00001000`. A common mistake in bit fields is forgetting to mask when interpreting flags.
As this is a bit field, the flags cannot be interpreted by a simple equality comparison.
For example, both `01` (`00000001`) and `03` (`00000011`) represent that the trace has been sampled because the sampled flag (`00000001`) is set, and `03` and `02` (`00000010`) both represent that at least the right-most 7 bytes of the `trace-id` are randomly (or pseudo-randomly) generated because the random bit (`00000010`) is set.
A common mistake when interpreting bit-fields is using a comparison of the whole number rather than interpreting a single bit.

Here is an example of properly handling trace flags:

``` java
static final byte FLAG_SAMPLED = 1; // 00000001
static final byte FLAG_RANDOM = 2; // 00000010
...
boolean sampled = (traceFlags & FLAG_SAMPLED) == FLAG_SAMPLED;
boolean random = (traceFlags & FLAG_RANDOM) == FLAG_RANDOM;
```

##### Sampled flag

The current version of this specification (`00`) only supports a single flag called `sampled`.

When set, the least significant bit (right-most), denotes that the caller may have recorded trace data. When unset, the caller did not record trace data out-of-band.

There are a number of recording scenarios that may break distributed tracing:
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -176,6 +184,17 @@ There are two additional options that vendors MAY follow:
- A component that makes a deferred or delayed recording decision may communicate the priority of a recording by setting `sampled` flag to `1` for a subset of requests.
- A component may also fall back to probability sampling and set the `sampled` flag to `1` for the subset of requests.

##### Random Trace ID Flag

The second least significant bit of the trace-flags field denotes the random-trace-id flag.
If that flag is set, at least the right-most 7 bytes of the trace ID MUST be random (or pseudo-random).
If the flag is not set, the trace ID MAY still be randomly (or pseudo-randomly) generated.
When unset, the trace ID MAY be generated in any way that satisfies the requirements of the [trace ID format](#trace-id).

When at least the right-most 7 bytes of the `trace-id` are randomly (or pseudo-randomly) generated, the random trace ID flag SHOULD be set to `1`.
This allows downstream consumers to implement features such as trace sampling or database sharding based on these bytes.
For additional information, see [considerations for trace-id field generation](#considerations-for-trace-id-field-generation).

##### Other Flags

The behavior of other flags, such as (`00000100`) is not defined and is reserved for future use. Vendors MUST set those to zero.
Expand Down
7 changes: 6 additions & 1 deletion spec/60-trace-id-format.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ concerns](#privacy-considerations) of exposing unwanted information. Randomness
also allows tracing vendors to base sampling decisions on `trace-id` field value
and avoid propagating an additional sampling context.

If the `random-trace-id` flag is set, at least the right-most 7 bytes of the
`trace-id` MUST be randomly (or pseudo-randomly) generated.

As shown in the next section, if part of the `trace-id` is nonrandom,
it is important for the random part of the `trace-id` to be as far right in the
`trace-id` as possible for better inter-operability with some existing systems.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -50,7 +53,9 @@ systems with these existing systems, the following practices are recommended:
compliant 16 bytes `trace-id` from a shorter identifier, it SHOULD left pad
the original identifier with zeroes. For example, the identifier
`53ce929d0e0e4736`, SHOULD be converted to `trace-id` value
`000000000000000053ce929d0e0e4736`.
`000000000000000053ce929d0e0e4736`. If the resultant `trace-id` value does
not satisfy the constraints of the `random-trace-id` flag, the flag MUST
be set to `0`.
2. When a system receives an inbound message and needs to convert the 16 bytes
`trace-id` to a shorter identifier, the rightmost part of `trace-id` SHOULD
be used as this identifier. For instance, if the value of `trace-id` was
Expand Down