Update labels-or-instructions.html #3888
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
closes #3887 clarifies that wcag is not recommending use of placeholder text, and instead recommends accompanying text to provide the information (which could then be part of label or description - but those details are not applicable to this SC so not specified in the update) This helps better match [technique g89](https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Techniques/general/G89.html) which includes the date format expectation as part of the label text
patrickhlauke
requested changes
May 31, 2024
Co-authored-by: Patrick H. Lauke <[email protected]>
patrickhlauke
approved these changes
Jun 7, 2024
bruce-usab
approved these changes
Jun 7, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes #3887
clarifies that wcag is not recommending use of placeholder text, and instead recommends accompanying text to provide the information (which could then be part of label or description - but those details are not applicable to this SC so not specified in the update)
This helps better match technique g89 which includes the date format expectation as part of the label text