You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The number of issues in this tracker is growing, and so is the comparatively smaller number of issues where cross-browser consensus has been achieved, the success stories of our group. We need a label to track issues with broad agreements.
Some has suggested "fixed" or "complete", but I'd like to see a less generic name that more accurately reflects broad approval, even if the changes themselves have not actually been implemented/shipped yet.
We don't necessarily need to track issues that have been rejected (there is already a wontfix label for that).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think we can use the new accepted, rejected, or implemented labels mentioned in #244 to track consensus across all the browsers. When more than one browser accepts or implements it can be considered for inclusion.
The number of issues in this tracker is growing, and so is the comparatively smaller number of issues where cross-browser consensus has been achieved, the success stories of our group. We need a label to track issues with broad agreements.
Some has suggested "fixed" or "complete", but I'd like to see a less generic name that more accurately reflects broad approval, even if the changes themselves have not actually been implemented/shipped yet.
We don't necessarily need to track issues that have been rejected (there is already a wontfix label for that).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: