Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WebKit's submission #7

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

WebKit's submission #7

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

darobin
Copy link
Contributor

@darobin darobin commented Dec 20, 2012

Yes, the moron who misnamed the branch is me.

@darobin
Copy link
Contributor Author

darobin commented Feb 6, 2013

This seems to be broken beyond merge repair — I need to look into recreating it.

@jgraham jgraham closed this Mar 24, 2013
@jgraham jgraham reopened this Mar 24, 2013
@jgraham
Copy link
Contributor

jgraham commented Mar 24, 2013

odinho added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2013
new test for "Once the end of the file is reached, any pending data must be discarded. (If the file ends in the middle of an event, before the final empty line, the incomplete event is not dispatched.)"
@zcorpan
Copy link
Member

zcorpan commented Sep 20, 2013

Are these going to be rewritten into testharness.js? If not, should we drop this PR?

@odinho
Copy link
Contributor

odinho commented Sep 20, 2013

They don't strike me as particulary useful in the current state. If they're good for translating, it might make sense to link to them on a TestTheWebForward what's-needed document. But other than that, well. Cleaning the request queue is nice. :)

@sideshowbarker
Copy link
Contributor

Are these going to be rewritten into testharness.js? If not, should we drop this PR?

This has been hanging open with no changes for 7 months so @darobin maybe it should just be dropped (and reformatted & resubmitted some time later).

@sideshowbarker
Copy link
Contributor

@darobin Closing this. Of course feel free to reopen it later if you want, but based on previous comments it seems like it'd need to be a separate new PR regardless.

@sideshowbarker sideshowbarker deleted the subsmission/WebKit branch June 18, 2015 07:23
RByers pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2016
Two separate tests: one for the general tap case and another for the mouse-drag case.

Doesn't attempt to test the behavior for touch drag because the spec and implementations often don't yet match (w3c/pointerevents/#7)
alancutter pushed a commit to alancutter/web-platform-tests that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2016
Upstream animation-play-after-finish-restarts.html from Blink
jimsch pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2016
Catch up to W3C master
ddorwin pushed a commit to ddorwin/web-platform-tests that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2016
…platform-tests#3202)

Two separate tests: one for the general tap case and another for the mouse-drag case.

Doesn't attempt to test the behavior for touch drag because the spec and implementations often don't yet match (w3c/pointerevents/web-platform-tests#7)
jgraham added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2017
Use substitutions on files with a .sub.* extension
jgraham added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2017
Fixup not starting ssl-requiring servers when ssl is disabled.
jgraham pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2017
Correct URIs for script-related commands
jgraham added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2017
Ensure that binary argument from command line exists
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2019
chromedriver doesn't allow changing Object.prototype to add enumerable
properties, but this test requires setting some values on
Object.prototype.  When Object.prototype.a is set to:

  {b: {c: 'on proto'}}

chromedriver fails with:

    JavascriptErrorException: javascript error (500): Maximum call stack size exceeded
      (Session info: chrome=72.0.3626.121)

    Remote-end stacktrace:

    #0 0x563ff3a32a59 <unknown>
    #1 0x563ff39cb7f3 <unknown>
    #2 0x563ff38fcd7c <unknown>
    #3 0x563ff38ff78c <unknown>
    #4 0x563ff38ff5f7 <unknown>
    #5 0x563ff38ffbe7 <unknown>
    #6 0x563ff38fff1b <unknown>
    #7 0x563ff38a3f7a <unknown>
    #8 0x563ff3899bf2 <unknown>
    #9 0x563ff38a37b7 <unknown>
    #10 0x563ff3899ac3 <unknown>
    #11 0x563ff38782d2 <unknown>
    #12 0x563ff3879112 <unknown>
    #13 0x563ff39fe865 <unknown>
    #14 0x563ff39ff32b <unknown>
    #15 0x563ff39ff70c <unknown>
    #16 0x563ff39d940a <unknown>
    #17 0x563ff39ff997 <unknown>
    #18 0x563ff39e9947 <unknown>
    #19 0x563ff3a1a800 <unknown>
    #20 0x563ff3a3c8be <unknown>
    #21 0x7f3bf4545494 start_thread
    #22 0x7f3bf2d58a8f clone

    Ran 1 tests finished in 2.0 seconds.
      • 0 ran as expected. 0 tests skipped.
      • 1 tests had errors unexpectedly

Work around this problem by cleaning up the test environment so
Object.prototype no longer has the override by the time chromedriver
tries to inspect the test result.

While here, fix the other tests to use the t.add_cleanup() function
so they'll cleanup their test environment in case they exit in
some other way besides reaching t.done().

The underlying chromedriver issue is tracked upstream at
https://crbug.com/chromedriver/2555.

Bug: 934844
Change-Id: Id1b4ab2a908bfbc001e2a2d045eeec3ef01c24d9
Hexcles pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2019
chromedriver doesn't allow changing Object.prototype to add enumerable
properties, but this test requires setting some values on
Object.prototype.  When Object.prototype.a is set to:

  {b: {c: 'on proto'}}

chromedriver fails with:

    JavascriptErrorException: javascript error (500): Maximum call stack size exceeded
      (Session info: chrome=72.0.3626.121)

    Remote-end stacktrace:

    #0 0x563ff3a32a59 <unknown>
    #1 0x563ff39cb7f3 <unknown>
    #2 0x563ff38fcd7c <unknown>
    #3 0x563ff38ff78c <unknown>
    #4 0x563ff38ff5f7 <unknown>
    #5 0x563ff38ffbe7 <unknown>
    #6 0x563ff38fff1b <unknown>
    #7 0x563ff38a3f7a <unknown>
    #8 0x563ff3899bf2 <unknown>
    #9 0x563ff38a37b7 <unknown>
    #10 0x563ff3899ac3 <unknown>
    #11 0x563ff38782d2 <unknown>
    #12 0x563ff3879112 <unknown>
    #13 0x563ff39fe865 <unknown>
    #14 0x563ff39ff32b <unknown>
    #15 0x563ff39ff70c <unknown>
    #16 0x563ff39d940a <unknown>
    #17 0x563ff39ff997 <unknown>
    #18 0x563ff39e9947 <unknown>
    #19 0x563ff3a1a800 <unknown>
    #20 0x563ff3a3c8be <unknown>
    #21 0x7f3bf4545494 start_thread
    #22 0x7f3bf2d58a8f clone

    Ran 1 tests finished in 2.0 seconds.
      • 0 ran as expected. 0 tests skipped.
      • 1 tests had errors unexpectedly

Work around this problem by cleaning up the test environment so
Object.prototype no longer has the override by the time chromedriver
tries to inspect the test result.

While here, fix the other tests to use the t.add_cleanup() function
so they'll cleanup their test environment in case they exit in
some other way besides reaching t.done().

The underlying chromedriver issue is tracked upstream at
https://crbug.com/chromedriver/2555.

Bug: 934844
Change-Id: Id1b4ab2a908bfbc001e2a2d045eeec3ef01c24d9
Hexcles pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2019
chromedriver doesn't allow changing Object.prototype to add enumerable
properties, but this test requires setting some values on
Object.prototype.  When Object.prototype.a is set to:

  {b: {c: 'on proto'}}

chromedriver fails with:

    JavascriptErrorException: javascript error (500): Maximum call stack size exceeded
      (Session info: chrome=72.0.3626.121)

    Remote-end stacktrace:

    #0 0x563ff3a32a59 <unknown>
    #1 0x563ff39cb7f3 <unknown>
    #2 0x563ff38fcd7c <unknown>
    #3 0x563ff38ff78c <unknown>
    #4 0x563ff38ff5f7 <unknown>
    #5 0x563ff38ffbe7 <unknown>
    #6 0x563ff38fff1b <unknown>
    #7 0x563ff38a3f7a <unknown>
    #8 0x563ff3899bf2 <unknown>
    #9 0x563ff38a37b7 <unknown>
    #10 0x563ff3899ac3 <unknown>
    #11 0x563ff38782d2 <unknown>
    #12 0x563ff3879112 <unknown>
    #13 0x563ff39fe865 <unknown>
    #14 0x563ff39ff32b <unknown>
    #15 0x563ff39ff70c <unknown>
    #16 0x563ff39d940a <unknown>
    #17 0x563ff39ff997 <unknown>
    #18 0x563ff39e9947 <unknown>
    #19 0x563ff3a1a800 <unknown>
    #20 0x563ff3a3c8be <unknown>
    #21 0x7f3bf4545494 start_thread
    #22 0x7f3bf2d58a8f clone

    Ran 1 tests finished in 2.0 seconds.
      • 0 ran as expected. 0 tests skipped.
      • 1 tests had errors unexpectedly

Work around this problem by cleaning up the test environment so
Object.prototype no longer has the override by the time chromedriver
tries to inspect the test result.

While here, fix the other tests to use the t.add_cleanup() function
so they'll cleanup their test environment in case they exit in
some other way besides reaching t.done().

The underlying chromedriver issue is tracked upstream at
https://crbug.com/chromedriver/2555.

Bug: 934844
Change-Id: Id1b4ab2a908bfbc001e2a2d045eeec3ef01c24d9
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2019
Flow relative longhands have been added to overscroll-behavior. [1]

TODO:

This is not yet functional as I think we need to teach css parser to map
inline/block to their physical counterparts x/y. Something similar to
direction_aware_properties [2] but only on the axes. There may be other
simpler way to do this.

Currently this crashes in [3].

[1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-overscroll-behavior-1/#overscroll-behavior-longhands-logical
[2] https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/third_party/blink/renderer/core/css/css_properties.json5?q=css_properties.json5&sq=package:chromium&dr&l=332

[3] Current crash:

STDERR: [1:1:0516/112659.776302:FATAL:css_property_parser_helpers.cc(1928)] Check failed: shorthand.length() == 2u (4 vs. 2)
STDERR: #0 0x7f40c88436b1 base::debug::CollectStackTrace()
STDERR: #1 0x7f40c8593bfd base::debug::StackTrace::StackTrace()
STDERR: #2 0x7f40c8593bb8 base::debug::StackTrace::StackTrace()
STDERR: #3 0x7f40c85e2829 logging::LogMessage::~LogMessage()
STDERR: #4 0x7f40b025e6bd blink::css_property_parser_helpers::ConsumeShorthandVia2Longhands()
STDERR: #5 0x7f40b0331909 blink::css_shorthand::OverscrollBehavior::ParseShorthand()
STDERR: #6 0x7f40b025782a blink::CSSPropertyParser::ParseValueStart()
STDERR: #7 0x7f40b0256e35 blink::CSSPropertyParser::ParseValue()
STDERR: #8 0x7f40b02456ec blink::CSSParserImpl::ConsumeDeclarationValue()
STDERR: #9 0x7f40b02455be blink::CSSParserImpl::ParseValue()
STDERR: #10 0x7f40b023956a blink::CSSParser::ParseValue()
STDERR: #11 0x7f40b02394f4 blink::CSSParser::ParseValue()
STDERR: #12 0x7f40b00ef77f blink::MutableCSSPropertyValueSet::SetProperty()
STDERR: #13 0x7f40b004c5a9 blink::AbstractPropertySetCSSStyleDeclaration::SetPropertyInternal()

Change-Id: I5ceefa0afb1913472c0e134b2ec07405154abfae
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2019
Flow relative longhands have been added to overscroll-behavior. [1]

TODO:

This is not yet functional as I think we need to teach css parser to map
inline/block to their physical counterparts x/y. Something similar to
direction_aware_properties [2] but only on the axes. There may be other
simpler way to do this.

Currently this crashes in [3].

[1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-overscroll-behavior-1/#overscroll-behavior-longhands-logical
[2] https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/third_party/blink/renderer/core/css/css_properties.json5?q=css_properties.json5&sq=package:chromium&dr&l=332

[3] Current crash:

STDERR: [1:1:0516/112659.776302:FATAL:css_property_parser_helpers.cc(1928)] Check failed: shorthand.length() == 2u (4 vs. 2)
STDERR: #0 0x7f40c88436b1 base::debug::CollectStackTrace()
STDERR: #1 0x7f40c8593bfd base::debug::StackTrace::StackTrace()
STDERR: #2 0x7f40c8593bb8 base::debug::StackTrace::StackTrace()
STDERR: #3 0x7f40c85e2829 logging::LogMessage::~LogMessage()
STDERR: #4 0x7f40b025e6bd blink::css_property_parser_helpers::ConsumeShorthandVia2Longhands()
STDERR: #5 0x7f40b0331909 blink::css_shorthand::OverscrollBehavior::ParseShorthand()
STDERR: #6 0x7f40b025782a blink::CSSPropertyParser::ParseValueStart()
STDERR: #7 0x7f40b0256e35 blink::CSSPropertyParser::ParseValue()
STDERR: #8 0x7f40b02456ec blink::CSSParserImpl::ConsumeDeclarationValue()
STDERR: #9 0x7f40b02455be blink::CSSParserImpl::ParseValue()
STDERR: #10 0x7f40b023956a blink::CSSParser::ParseValue()
STDERR: #11 0x7f40b02394f4 blink::CSSParser::ParseValue()
STDERR: #12 0x7f40b00ef77f blink::MutableCSSPropertyValueSet::SetProperty()
STDERR: #13 0x7f40b004c5a9 blink::AbstractPropertySetCSSStyleDeclaration::SetPropertyInternal()

Change-Id: I5ceefa0afb1913472c0e134b2ec07405154abfae
marcoscaceres pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2019
chromedriver doesn't allow changing Object.prototype to add enumerable
properties, but this test requires setting some values on
Object.prototype.  When Object.prototype.a is set to:

  {b: {c: 'on proto'}}

chromedriver fails with:

    JavascriptErrorException: javascript error (500): Maximum call stack size exceeded
      (Session info: chrome=72.0.3626.121)

    Remote-end stacktrace:

    #0 0x563ff3a32a59 <unknown>
    #1 0x563ff39cb7f3 <unknown>
    #2 0x563ff38fcd7c <unknown>
    #3 0x563ff38ff78c <unknown>
    #4 0x563ff38ff5f7 <unknown>
    #5 0x563ff38ffbe7 <unknown>
    #6 0x563ff38fff1b <unknown>
    #7 0x563ff38a3f7a <unknown>
    #8 0x563ff3899bf2 <unknown>
    #9 0x563ff38a37b7 <unknown>
    #10 0x563ff3899ac3 <unknown>
    #11 0x563ff38782d2 <unknown>
    #12 0x563ff3879112 <unknown>
    #13 0x563ff39fe865 <unknown>
    #14 0x563ff39ff32b <unknown>
    #15 0x563ff39ff70c <unknown>
    #16 0x563ff39d940a <unknown>
    #17 0x563ff39ff997 <unknown>
    #18 0x563ff39e9947 <unknown>
    #19 0x563ff3a1a800 <unknown>
    #20 0x563ff3a3c8be <unknown>
    #21 0x7f3bf4545494 start_thread
    #22 0x7f3bf2d58a8f clone

    Ran 1 tests finished in 2.0 seconds.
      • 0 ran as expected. 0 tests skipped.
      • 1 tests had errors unexpectedly

Work around this problem by cleaning up the test environment so
Object.prototype no longer has the override by the time chromedriver
tries to inspect the test result.

While here, fix the other tests to use the t.add_cleanup() function
so they'll cleanup their test environment in case they exit in
some other way besides reaching t.done().

The underlying chromedriver issue is tracked upstream at
https://crbug.com/chromedriver/2555.

Bug: 934844
Change-Id: Id1b4ab2a908bfbc001e2a2d045eeec3ef01c24d9
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2019
…iner height

See stack trace below. We set the override container logical height to -1
for the initial layout of a flex item so that we compute the correct size
for min-height. However, that messes with our cache for definite heights
because we would always set it to indefinite in such a case.

Instead, just don't cache these values. That way we will later compute the right
thing for resolving flex-basis, etc.

(FlexNG can't come soon enough...)

 #0  blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalHeightForPercentageResolution (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    out_cb=0x7f6e7d42d8c0, out_skipped_auto_height_containing_block=0x0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:3833
 #1  0x00007f6ee84ad0a1 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::MainAxisLengthIsDefinite (this=0x3dda8d434010,
    child=..., flex_basis=Length(0%, Percent), add_to_cb=false)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:762
 #2  0x00007f6ee84af930 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::MainSizeIsDefiniteForPercentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d434010, child=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1125
 #3  0x00007f6ee84ad7f5 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::UseOverrideLogicalHeightForPerentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d434010, child=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1137
 #4  0x00007f6ee83f2b9d in blink::LayoutBlock::AvailableLogicalHeightForPercentageComputation (
    this=0x3dda8d434198) at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_block.cc:2333
 #5  0x00007f6ee845e745 in blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalHeightForPercentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d4243d0, out_cb=0x0, out_skipped_auto_height_containing_block=0x0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:3830
 #6  0x00007f6ee86dcc5c in blink::LayoutBoxUtils::AvailableLogicalHeight (box=..., cb=0x3dda8d434198)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/ng/layout_box_utils.cc:64
 #7  0x00007f6ee86eafea in blink::LayoutNGMixin<blink::LayoutBlockFlow>::ComputeIntrinsicLogicalWidths (
    this=0x3dda8d4243d0, min_logical_width=0px, max_logical_width=0px)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/ng/layout_ng_mixin.cc:48
 #8  0x00007f6ee83ef53a in blink::LayoutBlock::ComputePreferredLogicalWidths (this=0x3dda8d4243d0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_block.cc:1509
 #9  0x00007f6ee8451f01 in blink::LayoutBox::MaxPreferredLogicalWidth (this=0x3dda8d4243d0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:1395
 #10 0x00007f6ee84adba2 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::ComputeInnerFlexBaseSizeForChild (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    child=..., main_axis_border_and_padding=0px, child_layout_type=blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::kForceLayout)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:890
 #11 0x00007f6ee84ae5d1 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::ConstructAndAppendFlexItem (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    algorithm=0x7f6e7d42ed70, child=..., layout_type=blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::kForceLayout)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1203
 #12 0x00007f6ee84aa27b in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::LayoutFlexItems (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    relayout_children=true, layout_scope=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:934
 #13 0x00007f6ee84a9cff in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::UpdateBlockLayout (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    relayout_children=true) at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:369

Bug: 1019138
Change-Id: Ie94e69a5f3fe6accc3623d358315b174088d5597
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2019
…iner height

See stack trace below. We set the override container logical height to -1
for the initial layout of a flex item so that we compute the correct size
for min-height. However, that messes with our cache for definite heights
because we would always set it to indefinite in such a case.

Instead, just don't cache these values. That way we will later compute the right
thing for resolving flex-basis, etc.

(FlexNG can't come soon enough...)

 #0  blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalHeightForPercentageResolution (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    out_cb=0x7f6e7d42d8c0, out_skipped_auto_height_containing_block=0x0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:3833
 #1  0x00007f6ee84ad0a1 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::MainAxisLengthIsDefinite (this=0x3dda8d434010,
    child=..., flex_basis=Length(0%, Percent), add_to_cb=false)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:762
 #2  0x00007f6ee84af930 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::MainSizeIsDefiniteForPercentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d434010, child=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1125
 #3  0x00007f6ee84ad7f5 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::UseOverrideLogicalHeightForPerentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d434010, child=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1137
 #4  0x00007f6ee83f2b9d in blink::LayoutBlock::AvailableLogicalHeightForPercentageComputation (
    this=0x3dda8d434198) at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_block.cc:2333
 #5  0x00007f6ee845e745 in blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalHeightForPercentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d4243d0, out_cb=0x0, out_skipped_auto_height_containing_block=0x0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:3830
 #6  0x00007f6ee86dcc5c in blink::LayoutBoxUtils::AvailableLogicalHeight (box=..., cb=0x3dda8d434198)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/ng/layout_box_utils.cc:64
 #7  0x00007f6ee86eafea in blink::LayoutNGMixin<blink::LayoutBlockFlow>::ComputeIntrinsicLogicalWidths (
    this=0x3dda8d4243d0, min_logical_width=0px, max_logical_width=0px)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/ng/layout_ng_mixin.cc:48
 #8  0x00007f6ee83ef53a in blink::LayoutBlock::ComputePreferredLogicalWidths (this=0x3dda8d4243d0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_block.cc:1509
 #9  0x00007f6ee8451f01 in blink::LayoutBox::MaxPreferredLogicalWidth (this=0x3dda8d4243d0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:1395
 #10 0x00007f6ee84adba2 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::ComputeInnerFlexBaseSizeForChild (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    child=..., main_axis_border_and_padding=0px, child_layout_type=blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::kForceLayout)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:890
 #11 0x00007f6ee84ae5d1 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::ConstructAndAppendFlexItem (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    algorithm=0x7f6e7d42ed70, child=..., layout_type=blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::kForceLayout)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1203
 #12 0x00007f6ee84aa27b in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::LayoutFlexItems (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    relayout_children=true, layout_scope=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:934
 #13 0x00007f6ee84a9cff in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::UpdateBlockLayout (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    relayout_children=true) at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:369

Bug: 1019138
Change-Id: Ie94e69a5f3fe6accc3623d358315b174088d5597
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2019
…iner height

See stack trace below. We set the override container logical height to -1
for the initial layout of a flex item so that we compute the correct size
for min-height. However, that messes with our cache for definite heights
because we would always set it to indefinite in such a case.

Instead, just don't cache these values. That way we will later compute the right
thing for resolving flex-basis, etc.

(FlexNG can't come soon enough...)

 #0  blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalHeightForPercentageResolution (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    out_cb=0x7f6e7d42d8c0, out_skipped_auto_height_containing_block=0x0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:3833
 #1  0x00007f6ee84ad0a1 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::MainAxisLengthIsDefinite (this=0x3dda8d434010,
    child=..., flex_basis=Length(0%, Percent), add_to_cb=false)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:762
 #2  0x00007f6ee84af930 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::MainSizeIsDefiniteForPercentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d434010, child=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1125
 #3  0x00007f6ee84ad7f5 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::UseOverrideLogicalHeightForPerentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d434010, child=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1137
 #4  0x00007f6ee83f2b9d in blink::LayoutBlock::AvailableLogicalHeightForPercentageComputation (
    this=0x3dda8d434198) at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_block.cc:2333
 #5  0x00007f6ee845e745 in blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalHeightForPercentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d4243d0, out_cb=0x0, out_skipped_auto_height_containing_block=0x0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:3830
 #6  0x00007f6ee86dcc5c in blink::LayoutBoxUtils::AvailableLogicalHeight (box=..., cb=0x3dda8d434198)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/ng/layout_box_utils.cc:64
 #7  0x00007f6ee86eafea in blink::LayoutNGMixin<blink::LayoutBlockFlow>::ComputeIntrinsicLogicalWidths (
    this=0x3dda8d4243d0, min_logical_width=0px, max_logical_width=0px)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/ng/layout_ng_mixin.cc:48
 #8  0x00007f6ee83ef53a in blink::LayoutBlock::ComputePreferredLogicalWidths (this=0x3dda8d4243d0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_block.cc:1509
 #9  0x00007f6ee8451f01 in blink::LayoutBox::MaxPreferredLogicalWidth (this=0x3dda8d4243d0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:1395
 #10 0x00007f6ee84adba2 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::ComputeInnerFlexBaseSizeForChild (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    child=..., main_axis_border_and_padding=0px, child_layout_type=blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::kForceLayout)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:890
 #11 0x00007f6ee84ae5d1 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::ConstructAndAppendFlexItem (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    algorithm=0x7f6e7d42ed70, child=..., layout_type=blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::kForceLayout)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1203
 #12 0x00007f6ee84aa27b in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::LayoutFlexItems (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    relayout_children=true, layout_scope=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:934
 #13 0x00007f6ee84a9cff in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::UpdateBlockLayout (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    relayout_children=true) at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:369

Bug: 1019138
Change-Id: Ie94e69a5f3fe6accc3623d358315b174088d5597
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1902514
Commit-Queue: David Grogan <[email protected]>
Auto-Submit: Christian Biesinger <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Grogan <[email protected]>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#713296}
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2019
…iner height

See stack trace below. We set the override container logical height to -1
for the initial layout of a flex item so that we compute the correct size
for min-height. However, that messes with our cache for definite heights
because we would always set it to indefinite in such a case.

Instead, just don't cache these values. That way we will later compute the right
thing for resolving flex-basis, etc.

(FlexNG can't come soon enough...)

 #0  blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalHeightForPercentageResolution (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    out_cb=0x7f6e7d42d8c0, out_skipped_auto_height_containing_block=0x0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:3833
 #1  0x00007f6ee84ad0a1 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::MainAxisLengthIsDefinite (this=0x3dda8d434010,
    child=..., flex_basis=Length(0%, Percent), add_to_cb=false)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:762
 #2  0x00007f6ee84af930 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::MainSizeIsDefiniteForPercentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d434010, child=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1125
 #3  0x00007f6ee84ad7f5 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::UseOverrideLogicalHeightForPerentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d434010, child=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1137
 #4  0x00007f6ee83f2b9d in blink::LayoutBlock::AvailableLogicalHeightForPercentageComputation (
    this=0x3dda8d434198) at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_block.cc:2333
 #5  0x00007f6ee845e745 in blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalHeightForPercentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d4243d0, out_cb=0x0, out_skipped_auto_height_containing_block=0x0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:3830
 #6  0x00007f6ee86dcc5c in blink::LayoutBoxUtils::AvailableLogicalHeight (box=..., cb=0x3dda8d434198)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/ng/layout_box_utils.cc:64
 #7  0x00007f6ee86eafea in blink::LayoutNGMixin<blink::LayoutBlockFlow>::ComputeIntrinsicLogicalWidths (
    this=0x3dda8d4243d0, min_logical_width=0px, max_logical_width=0px)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/ng/layout_ng_mixin.cc:48
 #8  0x00007f6ee83ef53a in blink::LayoutBlock::ComputePreferredLogicalWidths (this=0x3dda8d4243d0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_block.cc:1509
 #9  0x00007f6ee8451f01 in blink::LayoutBox::MaxPreferredLogicalWidth (this=0x3dda8d4243d0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:1395
 #10 0x00007f6ee84adba2 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::ComputeInnerFlexBaseSizeForChild (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    child=..., main_axis_border_and_padding=0px, child_layout_type=blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::kForceLayout)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:890
 #11 0x00007f6ee84ae5d1 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::ConstructAndAppendFlexItem (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    algorithm=0x7f6e7d42ed70, child=..., layout_type=blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::kForceLayout)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1203
 #12 0x00007f6ee84aa27b in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::LayoutFlexItems (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    relayout_children=true, layout_scope=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:934
 #13 0x00007f6ee84a9cff in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::UpdateBlockLayout (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    relayout_children=true) at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:369

Bug: 1019138
Change-Id: Ie94e69a5f3fe6accc3623d358315b174088d5597
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1902514
Commit-Queue: David Grogan <[email protected]>
Auto-Submit: Christian Biesinger <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Grogan <[email protected]>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#713296}
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2023
This reverts commit 3438f2a59daa31ad1d86777d73e1cff836cef570.

Reason for revert: Suspect causing blink_wpt_tests and blink_web_tests faliure on Linux Tests (dbg)(1) bot.

Failed tests:
blink_wpt_tests failed because of:
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/detach-locked-slot-children-crash.html
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/element-reassigned-to-skipped-slot.html
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/element-reassigned-to-slot-in-skipped-subtree.html
external/wpt/html/semantics/forms/the-input-element/focus-dynamic-type-change-on-blur.html
...7 more failure(s) (11 total)...

blink_web_tests failed because of:
accessibility/details-summary-crash.html
fast/events/drag-on-removed-slider-does-not-crash.html
fast/forms/range/range-type-change-onchange-2.html
html/details_summary/details-add-summary.html
...5 more failure(s) (9 total)...

First build failure:
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/chromium/builders/ci/Linux%20Tests%20(dbg)(1)/114032/overview

Sample log:
---
STDERR: #6 0x7fc01bd0361d logging::CheckError::~CheckError()
STDERR: #7 0x7fbffd21d08a blink::FlatTreeTraversal::AssertPrecondition()
STDERR: #8 0x7fbffd21cfd5 blink::FlatTreeTraversal::Parent()
STDERR: #9 0x7fbffd3c2a45 blink::FlatTreeTraversal::AncestorsOf()
STDERR: #10 0x7fbffd3d410e blink::(anonymous namespace)::NearestLockedExclusiveAncestor()
STDERR: #11 0x7fbffd3d3d17 blink::DisplayLockUtilities::IsInUnlockedOrActivatableSubtree()
STDERR: #12 0x7fbfedfabc4b blink::DisplayLockUtilities::ShouldIgnoreNodeDueToDisplayLock()
STDERR: #13 0x7fbfedf8b61c blink::AXObject::ToString()
STDERR: #14 0x7fbfedf8eccc blink::AXObject::Detach()
STDERR: #15 0x7fbfedf512df blink::AXNodeObject::Detach()
STDERR: #16 0x7fbfedf2d6a5 blink::AXLayoutObject::Detach()
STDERR: #17 0x7fbfedfce51a blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #18 0x7fbfedfcd998 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #19 0x7fbfedfcdd74 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #20 0x7fbfedfce992 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #21 0x7fbffe6d16be blink::LayoutObject::WillBeDestroyed()
---

Original change's description:
> [A11y] Reland targeted cached property invalidation
>
> Relands the following CLS:
> * Enhance performance by targeting value updates to specific nodes, commit 704633e6846e44b20c488a3eb98fa43c2c8e4591.
> * Don't queue anything for irrelevant attribute changes, commit 2c66a62ed62e601b7a81271e4be4f9e173ce9afc.
> * Add comment explaining call to UpdateStyleAndLayoutTreeForNode(), commit 73b9eed3b48bc8ce70de657672755f44a89e7358.
> * Ensure cached values not invalidated during the computation of them, commit 4d167a62cd13d5209ecefb664e3690ac955bc559.
> * Run a test with --force-renderer-accessibility that used to fail, commit cab7ecd829b24acf677e02f8f118085eaad7f799.
> * Simplify code to update cached focusable state, commit 79cb184e5dab5f6084ec78d485bd9496eaa0aaf8.
> * Simplify code that invalidates cached values on an AXObject, commit 6df79a50a55fe5cf99d2c50f7308e1236361b771.
>
> Fixed: 1446864, 1446550, 1434555, 1362758
> Change-Id: I16855bdcb746cb41387b69e1e97ab72ffc47e342
> Cq-Do-Not-Cancel-Tryjobs: true
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4545510
> Commit-Queue: Aaron Leventhal <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Jacques Newman <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Harrelson <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Philip Rogers <[email protected]>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1157878}

Change-Id: Iefe59fe1933747346eda8827fd683f310d6cddb3
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2023
This reverts commit 3438f2a59daa31ad1d86777d73e1cff836cef570.

Reason for revert: Suspect causing blink_wpt_tests and blink_web_tests failure on Linux Tests (dbg)(1) bot.

Failed tests:
blink_wpt_tests failed because of:
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/detach-locked-slot-children-crash.html
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/element-reassigned-to-skipped-slot.html
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/element-reassigned-to-slot-in-skipped-subtree.html
external/wpt/html/semantics/forms/the-input-element/focus-dynamic-type-change-on-blur.html
...7 more failure(s) (11 total)...

blink_web_tests failed because of:
accessibility/details-summary-crash.html
fast/events/drag-on-removed-slider-does-not-crash.html
fast/forms/range/range-type-change-onchange-2.html
html/details_summary/details-add-summary.html
...5 more failure(s) (9 total)...

First build failure:
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/chromium/builders/ci/Linux%20Tests%20(dbg)(1)/114032/overview

Sample log:
---
STDERR: #6 0x7fc01bd0361d logging::CheckError::~CheckError()
STDERR: #7 0x7fbffd21d08a blink::FlatTreeTraversal::AssertPrecondition()
STDERR: #8 0x7fbffd21cfd5 blink::FlatTreeTraversal::Parent()
STDERR: #9 0x7fbffd3c2a45 blink::FlatTreeTraversal::AncestorsOf()
STDERR: #10 0x7fbffd3d410e blink::(anonymous namespace)::NearestLockedExclusiveAncestor()
STDERR: #11 0x7fbffd3d3d17 blink::DisplayLockUtilities::IsInUnlockedOrActivatableSubtree()
STDERR: #12 0x7fbfedfabc4b blink::DisplayLockUtilities::ShouldIgnoreNodeDueToDisplayLock()
STDERR: #13 0x7fbfedf8b61c blink::AXObject::ToString()
STDERR: #14 0x7fbfedf8eccc blink::AXObject::Detach()
STDERR: #15 0x7fbfedf512df blink::AXNodeObject::Detach()
STDERR: #16 0x7fbfedf2d6a5 blink::AXLayoutObject::Detach()
STDERR: #17 0x7fbfedfce51a blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #18 0x7fbfedfcd998 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #19 0x7fbfedfcdd74 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #20 0x7fbfedfce992 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #21 0x7fbffe6d16be blink::LayoutObject::WillBeDestroyed()
---

Original change's description:
> [A11y] Reland targeted cached property invalidation
>
> Relands the following CLS:
> * Enhance performance by targeting value updates to specific nodes, commit 704633e6846e44b20c488a3eb98fa43c2c8e4591.
> * Don't queue anything for irrelevant attribute changes, commit 2c66a62ed62e601b7a81271e4be4f9e173ce9afc.
> * Add comment explaining call to UpdateStyleAndLayoutTreeForNode(), commit 73b9eed3b48bc8ce70de657672755f44a89e7358.
> * Ensure cached values not invalidated during the computation of them, commit 4d167a62cd13d5209ecefb664e3690ac955bc559.
> * Run a test with --force-renderer-accessibility that used to fail, commit cab7ecd829b24acf677e02f8f118085eaad7f799.
> * Simplify code to update cached focusable state, commit 79cb184e5dab5f6084ec78d485bd9496eaa0aaf8.
> * Simplify code that invalidates cached values on an AXObject, commit 6df79a50a55fe5cf99d2c50f7308e1236361b771.
>
> Fixed: 1446864, 1446550, 1434555, 1362758
> Change-Id: I16855bdcb746cb41387b69e1e97ab72ffc47e342
> Cq-Do-Not-Cancel-Tryjobs: true
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4545510
> Commit-Queue: Aaron Leventhal <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Jacques Newman <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Harrelson <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Philip Rogers <[email protected]>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1157878}

Change-Id: Iefe59fe1933747346eda8827fd683f310d6cddb3
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2023
This reverts commit 3438f2a59daa31ad1d86777d73e1cff836cef570.

Reason for revert: Suspect causing blink_wpt_tests and blink_web_tests failure on Linux Tests (dbg)(1) bot.

Failed tests:
blink_wpt_tests failed because of:
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/detach-locked-slot-children-crash.html
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/element-reassigned-to-skipped-slot.html
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/element-reassigned-to-slot-in-skipped-subtree.html
external/wpt/html/semantics/forms/the-input-element/focus-dynamic-type-change-on-blur.html
...7 more failure(s) (11 total)...

blink_web_tests failed because of:
accessibility/details-summary-crash.html
fast/events/drag-on-removed-slider-does-not-crash.html
fast/forms/range/range-type-change-onchange-2.html
html/details_summary/details-add-summary.html
...5 more failure(s) (9 total)...

First build failure:
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/chromium/builders/ci/Linux%20Tests%20(dbg)(1)/114032/overview

Sample log:
---
STDERR: #6 0x7fc01bd0361d logging::CheckError::~CheckError()
STDERR: #7 0x7fbffd21d08a blink::FlatTreeTraversal::AssertPrecondition()
STDERR: #8 0x7fbffd21cfd5 blink::FlatTreeTraversal::Parent()
STDERR: #9 0x7fbffd3c2a45 blink::FlatTreeTraversal::AncestorsOf()
STDERR: #10 0x7fbffd3d410e blink::(anonymous namespace)::NearestLockedExclusiveAncestor()
STDERR: #11 0x7fbffd3d3d17 blink::DisplayLockUtilities::IsInUnlockedOrActivatableSubtree()
STDERR: #12 0x7fbfedfabc4b blink::DisplayLockUtilities::ShouldIgnoreNodeDueToDisplayLock()
STDERR: #13 0x7fbfedf8b61c blink::AXObject::ToString()
STDERR: #14 0x7fbfedf8eccc blink::AXObject::Detach()
STDERR: #15 0x7fbfedf512df blink::AXNodeObject::Detach()
STDERR: #16 0x7fbfedf2d6a5 blink::AXLayoutObject::Detach()
STDERR: #17 0x7fbfedfce51a blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #18 0x7fbfedfcd998 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #19 0x7fbfedfcdd74 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #20 0x7fbfedfce992 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #21 0x7fbffe6d16be blink::LayoutObject::WillBeDestroyed()
---

Original change's description:
> [A11y] Reland targeted cached property invalidation
>
> Relands the following CLS:
> * Enhance performance by targeting value updates to specific nodes, commit 704633e6846e44b20c488a3eb98fa43c2c8e4591.
> * Don't queue anything for irrelevant attribute changes, commit 2c66a62ed62e601b7a81271e4be4f9e173ce9afc.
> * Add comment explaining call to UpdateStyleAndLayoutTreeForNode(), commit 73b9eed3b48bc8ce70de657672755f44a89e7358.
> * Ensure cached values not invalidated during the computation of them, commit 4d167a62cd13d5209ecefb664e3690ac955bc559.
> * Run a test with --force-renderer-accessibility that used to fail, commit cab7ecd829b24acf677e02f8f118085eaad7f799.
> * Simplify code to update cached focusable state, commit 79cb184e5dab5f6084ec78d485bd9496eaa0aaf8.
> * Simplify code that invalidates cached values on an AXObject, commit 6df79a50a55fe5cf99d2c50f7308e1236361b771.
>
> Fixed: 1446864, 1446550, 1434555, 1362758
> Change-Id: I16855bdcb746cb41387b69e1e97ab72ffc47e342
> Cq-Do-Not-Cancel-Tryjobs: true
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4545510
> Commit-Queue: Aaron Leventhal <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Jacques Newman <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Harrelson <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Philip Rogers <[email protected]>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1157878}

Change-Id: Iefe59fe1933747346eda8827fd683f310d6cddb3
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4615927
Reviewed-by: Takuto Ikuta <[email protected]>
Owners-Override: Takuto Ikuta <[email protected]>
Commit-Queue: Takuto Ikuta <[email protected]>
Auto-Submit: Takashi Sakamoto <[email protected]>
Bot-Commit: Rubber Stamper <[email protected]>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1157993}
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2023
This reverts commit 3438f2a59daa31ad1d86777d73e1cff836cef570.

Reason for revert: Suspect causing blink_wpt_tests and blink_web_tests failure on Linux Tests (dbg)(1) bot.

Failed tests:
blink_wpt_tests failed because of:
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/detach-locked-slot-children-crash.html
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/element-reassigned-to-skipped-slot.html
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/element-reassigned-to-slot-in-skipped-subtree.html
external/wpt/html/semantics/forms/the-input-element/focus-dynamic-type-change-on-blur.html
...7 more failure(s) (11 total)...

blink_web_tests failed because of:
accessibility/details-summary-crash.html
fast/events/drag-on-removed-slider-does-not-crash.html
fast/forms/range/range-type-change-onchange-2.html
html/details_summary/details-add-summary.html
...5 more failure(s) (9 total)...

First build failure:
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/chromium/builders/ci/Linux%20Tests%20(dbg)(1)/114032/overview

Sample log:
---
STDERR: #6 0x7fc01bd0361d logging::CheckError::~CheckError()
STDERR: #7 0x7fbffd21d08a blink::FlatTreeTraversal::AssertPrecondition()
STDERR: #8 0x7fbffd21cfd5 blink::FlatTreeTraversal::Parent()
STDERR: #9 0x7fbffd3c2a45 blink::FlatTreeTraversal::AncestorsOf()
STDERR: #10 0x7fbffd3d410e blink::(anonymous namespace)::NearestLockedExclusiveAncestor()
STDERR: #11 0x7fbffd3d3d17 blink::DisplayLockUtilities::IsInUnlockedOrActivatableSubtree()
STDERR: #12 0x7fbfedfabc4b blink::DisplayLockUtilities::ShouldIgnoreNodeDueToDisplayLock()
STDERR: #13 0x7fbfedf8b61c blink::AXObject::ToString()
STDERR: #14 0x7fbfedf8eccc blink::AXObject::Detach()
STDERR: #15 0x7fbfedf512df blink::AXNodeObject::Detach()
STDERR: #16 0x7fbfedf2d6a5 blink::AXLayoutObject::Detach()
STDERR: #17 0x7fbfedfce51a blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #18 0x7fbfedfcd998 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #19 0x7fbfedfcdd74 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #20 0x7fbfedfce992 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #21 0x7fbffe6d16be blink::LayoutObject::WillBeDestroyed()
---

Original change's description:
> [A11y] Reland targeted cached property invalidation
>
> Relands the following CLS:
> * Enhance performance by targeting value updates to specific nodes, commit 704633e6846e44b20c488a3eb98fa43c2c8e4591.
> * Don't queue anything for irrelevant attribute changes, commit 2c66a62ed62e601b7a81271e4be4f9e173ce9afc.
> * Add comment explaining call to UpdateStyleAndLayoutTreeForNode(), commit 73b9eed3b48bc8ce70de657672755f44a89e7358.
> * Ensure cached values not invalidated during the computation of them, commit 4d167a62cd13d5209ecefb664e3690ac955bc559.
> * Run a test with --force-renderer-accessibility that used to fail, commit cab7ecd829b24acf677e02f8f118085eaad7f799.
> * Simplify code to update cached focusable state, commit 79cb184e5dab5f6084ec78d485bd9496eaa0aaf8.
> * Simplify code that invalidates cached values on an AXObject, commit 6df79a50a55fe5cf99d2c50f7308e1236361b771.
>
> Fixed: 1446864, 1446550, 1434555, 1362758
> Change-Id: I16855bdcb746cb41387b69e1e97ab72ffc47e342
> Cq-Do-Not-Cancel-Tryjobs: true
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4545510
> Commit-Queue: Aaron Leventhal <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Jacques Newman <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Harrelson <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Philip Rogers <[email protected]>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1157878}

Change-Id: Iefe59fe1933747346eda8827fd683f310d6cddb3
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4615927
Reviewed-by: Takuto Ikuta <[email protected]>
Owners-Override: Takuto Ikuta <[email protected]>
Commit-Queue: Takuto Ikuta <[email protected]>
Auto-Submit: Takashi Sakamoto <[email protected]>
Bot-Commit: Rubber Stamper <[email protected]>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1157993}
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2024
Since @page border box layout objects aren't in the the layout tree, any
code that wants to walk up the tree to find the containing block will be
in for a surprise.

This would happen if percentage-based @page padding was used [1].
Recomputing padding during painting when we have already done it during
layout is rather pointless anyway. Read it out directly from the
fragment.

[1] #1 blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalWidthForContent()
    #2 blink::LayoutBoxModelObject::ComputedCSSPadding()
    #3 blink::LayoutBoxModelObject::PaddingTop()
    #4 blink::LayoutBoxModelObject::PaddingOutsets()
    #5 blink::BoxPainterBase::PaintFillLayer()
    #6 blink::BoxPainterBase::PaintFillLayers()
    #7 blink::BoxFragmentPainter::PaintBackground()

Bug: 40286153
Change-Id: I1e6e92c2ce1d81aab2673ec9a877eac455534102
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2024
Since @page border box layout objects aren't in the the layout tree, any
code that wants to walk up the tree to find the containing block will be
in for a surprise.

This would happen if percentage-based @page padding was used [1].
Recomputing padding during painting when we have already done it during
layout is rather pointless anyway. Read it out directly from the
fragment.

[1] #1 blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalWidthForContent()
    #2 blink::LayoutBoxModelObject::ComputedCSSPadding()
    #3 blink::LayoutBoxModelObject::PaddingTop()
    #4 blink::LayoutBoxModelObject::PaddingOutsets()
    #5 blink::BoxPainterBase::PaintFillLayer()
    #6 blink::BoxPainterBase::PaintFillLayers()
    #7 blink::BoxFragmentPainter::PaintBackground()

Bug: 40286153
Change-Id: I1e6e92c2ce1d81aab2673ec9a877eac455534102
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5526469
Commit-Queue: Morten Stenshorne <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Xianzhu Wang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ian Kilpatrick <[email protected]>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1300711}
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2024
Since @page border box layout objects aren't in the the layout tree, any
code that wants to walk up the tree to find the containing block will be
in for a surprise.

This would happen if percentage-based @page padding was used [1].
Recomputing padding during painting when we have already done it during
layout is rather pointless anyway. Read it out directly from the
fragment.

[1] #1 blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalWidthForContent()
    #2 blink::LayoutBoxModelObject::ComputedCSSPadding()
    #3 blink::LayoutBoxModelObject::PaddingTop()
    #4 blink::LayoutBoxModelObject::PaddingOutsets()
    #5 blink::BoxPainterBase::PaintFillLayer()
    #6 blink::BoxPainterBase::PaintFillLayers()
    #7 blink::BoxFragmentPainter::PaintBackground()

Bug: 40286153
Change-Id: I1e6e92c2ce1d81aab2673ec9a877eac455534102
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5526469
Commit-Queue: Morten Stenshorne <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Xianzhu Wang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ian Kilpatrick <[email protected]>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1300711}
spectranaut pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2024
Implement get_accessibility_api_node for AXAPI
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants