fix(docs): introduction

[danforbes]

Description

• In header navbar, libdocs link has been renamed from "Documentation" to "Packages"
• Added a "Using These Docs" section to Introduction
• Added a section about plugins to Introduction

[github-actions]

Bundle Stats

Hey there, this message comes from a GitHub action that helps you and reviewers to understand how these changes affect the size of this project's bundle.

As this PR is updated, I'll keep you updated on how the bundle size is impacted.

Total

Files count	Total bundle size	% Changed
10	630.32 kB	0%

Changeset

No files were changed

View detailed bundle breakdown

Added

No assets were added

Removed

No assets were removed

Bigger

No assets were bigger

Smaller

No assets were smaller

Unchanged

Asset	File Size	% Changed
web3.min.js	611.03 kB	0%
../lib/commonjs/index.d.ts	8.69 kB	0%
../lib/commonjs/accounts.d.ts	3.89 kB	0%
../lib/commonjs/types.d.ts	2.67 kB	0%
../lib/commonjs/web3.d.ts	1.35 kB	0%
../lib/commonjs/web3_eip6963.d.ts	1.2 kB	0%
../lib/commonjs/abi.d.ts	999 B	0%
../lib/commonjs/eth.exports.d.ts	280 B	0%
../lib/commonjs/providers.exports.d.ts	183 B	0%
../lib/commonjs/version.d.ts	60 B	0%

[github-actions]

Benchmark

Benchmark suite	Current: e4ba0aa	Previous: 94f4f82	Ratio
processingTx	9242 ops/sec (±3.70%)	8833 ops/sec (±4.02%)	0.96
processingContractDeploy	39996 ops/sec (±7.54%)	35881 ops/sec (±7.95%)	0.90
processingContractMethodSend	19685 ops/sec (±7.97%)	18484 ops/sec (±4.82%)	0.94
processingContractMethodCall	38139 ops/sec (±6.07%)	37028 ops/sec (±4.19%)	0.97
abiEncode	44613 ops/sec (±6.34%)	39527 ops/sec (±7.28%)	0.89
abiDecode	29505 ops/sec (±8.62%)	27646 ops/sec (±8.72%)	0.94
sign	1558 ops/sec (±2.93%)	1571 ops/sec (±0.91%)	1.01
verify	369 ops/sec (±0.90%)	360 ops/sec (±2.83%)	0.98

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.98%. Comparing base (94f4f82) to head (e4ba0aa).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              4.x    #7083   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.98%   93.98%           
=======================================
  Files         215      215           
  Lines        8335     8335           
  Branches     2301     2301           
=======================================
  Hits         7834     7834           
  Misses        501      501           

Flag	Coverage Δ
UnitTests	93.98% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
web3	∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-core	∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-errors	∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-eth	∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-eth-abi	∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-eth-accounts	∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-eth-contract	∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-eth-ens	∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-eth-iban	∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-eth-personal	∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-net	∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-providers-http	∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-providers-ipc	∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-providers-ws	∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-rpc-methods	∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-utils	∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-validator	∅ <ø> (∅)

[jdevcs]

I think we should keep this overview under introduction section

[jdevcs]

but at same time if we want to highlight "Using These Docs" section , what do you think about using https://docusaurus.io/docs/markdown-features/admonitions ?

[danforbes]

Oh, I just moved the section back to its original location 😅 Are you suggesting that "Features of Web3.js v4" get moved back to its original location and then we use an admonition for the "Using These Docs" section? I do not necessarily like the idea of using an admonition for "Using These Docs" as I think it's too much text to go into an admonition...

[jdevcs]

looks good, just added few updates ideas, Thanks @danforbes