Skip to content

Issues: webbdays/pocket

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

283 Open 0 Closed
283 Open 0 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

AddrBook management optimization and refactoring** [#246](github.com/pokt-network/pocket/issues/246) todo 🗒️
#283 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
Consider create a type for signature and having constraints for each type as well. todo 🗒️
#282 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
This could (should?) be a codebase-wide shared test helper todo 🗒️
#281 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
research badger.views for further improvements and optimizations todo 🗒️
#280 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
This is only used in tests. Should we remove it? todo 🗒️
#279 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
Consider renaming highPrepareQC to simply prepareQC todo 🗒️
#278 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
marked for removal since we'll implement a better pattern for dependency injection todo 🗒️
#277 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
Not part of TestMain because a mock requires testing.T to be initialized. todo 🗒️
#276 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
define UX for return values - should we return the raw response or a parsed/human readable response? For now, I am simply printing to stdout todo 🗒️
#275 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
Dmitry has expressed multiple times that this should be a gauge instead of a counter todo 🗒️
#274 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
this is a temporary solution that guarantees backward compatibility while we implement peer discovery. todo 🗒️
#273 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
Consider removing all Set methods (e.g. SetAccountAmount) and replace with Add (e.g. AddAccountAmount) by having it leverage a "default zero". todo 🗒️
#272 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
All the functions of PostgresContext should be organized in appropriate packages and use pointer receivers todo 🗒️
#271 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
both the persistence module and the utility module share this code which is less than ideal todo 🗒️
#270 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
evaluate whether or not we should use micro denomination or not todo 🗒️
#269 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
Look into whether the receivers of PostgresContext could/should be pointers? todo 🗒️
#268 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
Should we prefix the functions in the PersistenceModule with the Param / Actor it's impacting to make autocomplete in implementation better? todo 🗒️
#267 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
This is a proof of concept. Ideally we should have a single query that returns all actors. todo 🗒️
#266 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
Revisit if is used correctly in the context of the lifecycle of a persistenceContext and a utilityContext todo 🗒️
#265 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
Need to implement context pooling (for writes), timeouts (for read & writes), etc... todo 🗒️
#264 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
If we are okay with GetPoolAmount return 0 as a default, this function can leverage todo 🗒️
#263 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
Deprecate using logs for event metrics for a more sophisticated and durable solution todo 🗒️
#262 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
Improve the output of this benchmark to be more informative and human readable. todo 🗒️
#261 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
Does not scale to 1,000,000,000 nodes todo 🗒️
#260 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
Reduce package scope visibility in the consensus test module todo 🗒️
#259 opened Jan 12, 2023 by github-actions bot
ProTip! Follow long discussions with comments:>50.