Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: upgrade dependencies to the latest version #608

Closed

Conversation

ersachin3112
Copy link
Contributor

@ersachin3112 ersachin3112 commented Jul 2, 2023

This PR contains a:

  • bugfix
  • new feature
  • code refactor
  • test update
  • typo fix
  • metadata update

Motivation / Use-Case

upgrade dependencies to the latest version

Breaking Changes

No

Additional Info

No

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 5, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -3.04 ⚠️

Comparison is base (16e401b) 89.96% compared to head (2b81220) 86.93%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #608      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.96%   86.93%   -3.04%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines         329      329              
  Branches      170      170              
==========================================
- Hits          296      286      -10     
- Misses         27       36       +9     
- Partials        6        7       +1     

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

"ModuleWarning: Module Warning (from ../../src/cjs.js):
You can't use \`experiments.css\` (\`experiments.futureDefaults\` enable built-in CSS support by default) and \`style-loader\` together, please set \`experiments.css\` to \`false\` or set \`{ type: \\"javascript/auto\\" }\` for rules with \`style-loader\` in your webpack config (now \`style-loader\` does nothing).",
]
`;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ersachin3112 Can you look why it was changed? Maybe we have a regression

@ersachin3112 ersachin3112 deleted the deps-up-grade branch September 11, 2023 15:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants