-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 319
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(parse-http): prevent announcement from peers with invalid ports #513
fix(parse-http): prevent announcement from peers with invalid ports #513
Conversation
wtf, how can this ever occur on an actual network stack? |
It is not possible in an actual TCP or UDP connection, any port lower than 1 and higher than 65535 is invalid. In the UDP tracker, this is handled as the port is a read as a In the HTTP tracker, this port is cast as a These values then crash the server elsewhere as there are assumptions that only valid port ranges would added to the swarm. |
f11b7f0
to
20d777a
Compare
idk, I don't think I'll ever have time to review this, as there's too many things to understand and consider, such as: |
Due to the port in this case coming from |
## [11.0.2](v11.0.1...v11.0.2) (2024-03-12) ### Bug Fixes * **parse-http:** ignore announcements from peers with invalid announcement ports. ([#513](#513)) ([fe75272](fe75272))
🎉 This PR is included in version 11.0.2 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)
[ ] Documentation update
[x] Bug fix
[ ] New feature
[ ] Other, please explain:
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
This change implements a small check within
parse-http.js
to prevent peers with invalid announcement ports from having their announcements accepted or added to the swarm. Valid ports within this implementation are considered any port within the range of 1 - 65535.Note: Port 0 is excluded as it is invalid for communication between hosts and is only used for local dynamic port binding.
Which issue (if any) does this pull request address?
#512
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?