Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/weos 1127 - As a developer I should be able to get a list of content type #103

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Feb 21, 2022

Conversation

atoniaw
Copy link
Contributor

@atoniaw atoniaw commented Feb 17, 2022

  • Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

  • What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)

  • What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

  • Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)

  • Other information:

atoniaw and others added 13 commits February 15, 2022 15:16
added get api bdd test
added bare function for api discovery
made fixes to feature file formatting
added ability to set expected content type in the context so it can be checked in the api discovery handler
feature/Weos 1247 - API Discovery
made default endpoints for returning swagger ui  as json and html
feature/Weos 1249 - Add handler to allow user to get swagger configuration as html or json
atoniaw and others added 2 commits February 18, 2022 11:33
ensure returning json configuration does not redirect
feature/WEOS-1250  - PR Changes
@akeemphilbert akeemphilbert merged commit 2c280b2 into dev Feb 21, 2022
@akeemphilbert akeemphilbert deleted the feature/WEOS-1127 branch February 21, 2022 19:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants