Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

avers being suspended from stackage nightly #1

Closed
cdornan opened this issue Aug 24, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

avers being suspended from stackage nightly #1

cdornan opened this issue Aug 24, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@cdornan
Copy link

cdornan commented Aug 24, 2017

avers is blocking inflections-4.0.0.0, which we need as inflections-3.0.0.0 was blocking megaparsec-6, which has been held up for 4 weeks (see commercialhaskell/stackage#2666).

Can you get avers to work with inflections-4.0.0.0 so we can get avers back into stackage nightly.

@wereHamster
Copy link
Owner

Would it be possible to get notified about these transitive dependencies earlier? I don't think allowing inflections 0.4 is going to be much work (in fact, I think I can just bump the upper bounds on hackage, since the megaparsec API doesn't leak through the inflections package in any meaningful way). You could avoid all this churn of dropping avers and then including it again a few hours later if you notified me about this earlier (ideally the same day commercialhaskell/stackage#2666 was created).

@wereHamster
Copy link
Owner

All tests pass. I updated the upper bounds on hackage.

@cdornan
Copy link
Author

cdornan commented Aug 24, 2017

@wereHamster that is a very good question! I have just come in and don't know how obvious it was to see this with our current tools, but I certainly agree with you and would happily notify you ahead of time instead of this.

But I am in charge until Monday and will hook it back in for the next run.

@cdornan
Copy link
Author

cdornan commented Aug 24, 2017

I have a stackage PR to reinstate avers on nightly which I will merge before the next run.

@juhp
Copy link

juhp commented Sep 25, 2017

I guess this could be closed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants