Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use interface mixins instead of [NoInterfaceObject] #3207

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 20, 2017
Merged

Use interface mixins instead of [NoInterfaceObject] #3207

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 20, 2017

Commits on Dec 18, 2017

  1. Use interface mixins instead of [NoInterfaceObject] 

    WebIDL recently introduced dedicated syntax for mixins[1]. So, we can
replace `[NoInterfaceObject]` and `implements` with `interface mixin` and
`includes`.

[1] whatwg/webidl@45e8173
    @romandev
    romandev committed Dec 18, 2017
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    79db619 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

Commits on Dec 20, 2017

  1. Fix extraneous newlines

    @domenic
    domenic committed Dec 20, 2017
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    395a38e View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

  2. Missed the new-ish NoncedElement

    @domenic
    domenic committed Dec 20, 2017
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    85408e2 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

  3. Tweak a heading too

    @domenic
    domenic committed Dec 20, 2017
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    cf43228 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

  4. Fix reference to "interfaces" for navigator

    @domenic
    domenic committed Dec 20, 2017
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    caad0e4 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history